{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T02:05:35Z","timestamp":1790129135439,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]],"date-time":"2017-05-31T16:48:28Z","timestamp":1496249308000},"page":"1625-1632","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Reporting the results of meta-analyses: a plea for incorporating clinical relevance referring to an example"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8638-4660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ronald H.M.A.","family":"Bartels","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roland D.","family":"Donk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wim I.M.","family":"Verhagen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Allard J.F.","family":"Hosman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andr\u00e9 L.M.","family":"Verbeek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-014-0144-x","article-title":"Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions","volume":"10","author":"Katz","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.01.008","article-title":"Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods","volume":"7","author":"Copay","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3180b9ef49","article-title":"Statistical significance versus clinical importance: trials on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain as example","volume":"32","author":"van Tulder","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2002.11111.x","article-title":"Determination of the clinical importance of study results","volume":"17","author":"Man-Son-Hing","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0b013e3181ec98e6","article-title":"Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy","volume":"89","author":"Young","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.SPINE12312","article-title":"Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article","volume":"18","author":"Parker","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3047","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815cf75b","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain","volume":"32","author":"Pool","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejpain.2003.09.004","article-title":"Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale","volume":"8","author":"Salaffi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2735","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4228-z","article-title":"Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes","volume":"24","author":"Aragones","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000369189.09182.5F","article-title":"No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"66","author":"Bartels","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e43407","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0043407","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Fallah","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1816","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001138","article-title":"An updated meta-analysis comparing artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD)","volume":"40","author":"Gao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0075","article-title":"Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials","volume":"11","author":"Hu","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-011-1401-7","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"132","author":"Jiang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000395","article-title":"Cervical disk arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion for the treatment of 2-level cervical spondylopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Kuang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.09.010","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis","volume":"22","author":"Li","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1510-4","article-title":"Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"25","author":"Luo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31823da169","article-title":"A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients","volume":"37","author":"McAfee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1469-1","article-title":"Comparison of the short- and long-term treatment effect of cervical disk replacement and anterior cervical disk fusion: a meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"Muheremu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-014-2122-5","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"135","author":"Rao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3220-3","article-title":"Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"23","author":"Ren","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e665","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000000665","article-title":"Minimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials","volume":"94","author":"Wu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2012.03.046","article-title":"A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease","volume":"20","author":"Xing","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-015-2337-0","article-title":"A meta-analysis comparing total disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases","volume":"136","author":"Yao","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e651","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20110826-09","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion","volume":"34","author":"Yu","year":"2011","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0117826","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0117826","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement is superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials","volume":"10","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E733","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001367","article-title":"Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials","volume":"41","author":"Zhu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4655-5","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"26","author":"Zou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1904","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2830-0","article-title":"Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis","volume":"471","author":"Yin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.1996.392","article-title":"Meta-analyses of randomised trials: when the whole is more than just the sum of the parts","volume":"74","author":"Parmar","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.4103\/2229-3485.159943","article-title":"Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: clinical versus statistical significance","volume":"6","author":"Ranganathan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Perspect Clin Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2012.11.011","article-title":"Defining substantial clinical benefit for patient-rated outcome tools for shoulder impingement syndrome","volume":"94","author":"Michener","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.04.003","article-title":"Methodological problems associated with the present conceptualization of the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit","volume":"10","author":"Theodore","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1111\/ijcp.12142","article-title":"When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed","volume":"67","author":"Citrome","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.310.6977.452","article-title":"The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect","volume":"310","author":"Cook","year":"1995","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017302115?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017302115?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,29]],"date-time":"2022-07-29T00:32:26Z","timestamp":1659054746000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1529943017302115"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S1529943017302115"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1529-9430","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Reporting the results of meta-analyses: a plea for incorporating clinical relevance referring to an example","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}