{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T14:14:40Z","timestamp":1776348880747,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,1]],"date-time":"2018-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1522540800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000133","name":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01HSO18405"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01HSO18405"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000133","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"National Institute for Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases","award":["P60AR062799"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["P60AR062799"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,25]],"date-time":"2017-08-25T13:48:33Z","timestamp":1503668913000},"page":"584-592","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Stephanie J.","family":"Tapp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brook I.","family":"Martin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tor D.","family":"Tosteson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jon D.","family":"Lurie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Milton C.","family":"Weinstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Richard A.","family":"Deyo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sohail K.","family":"Mirza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna N.A.","family":"Tosteson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00003","article-title":"Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years","volume":"149","author":"Tosteson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1596","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1873-8","article-title":"Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Moojen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-12-57","article-title":"Design of the Verbiest trial: cost-effectiveness of surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment in patients with lumbar stenosis","volume":"12","author":"Overdevest","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09552","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP","volume":"13","author":"Burnett","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1","article-title":"A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X-STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results","volume":"30","author":"Zucherman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0035","first-page":"305","article-title":"Two-year evaluation of the X-STOP interspinous spacer in different primary patient populations with neurogenic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"29","author":"Hartjen","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000731","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)","volume":"40","author":"Lurie","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0122800","article-title":"Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Machado","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0050","first-page":"681","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"26","author":"Moojen","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-003-0581-4","article-title":"A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results","volume":"13","author":"Zucherman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828631b8","article-title":"Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population","volume":"38","author":"Deyo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ba413","article-title":"X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"38","author":"Stromqvist","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E345","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181f2ed2f","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"36","author":"Skidmore","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1177\/02729890122062352","article-title":"Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36","volume":"21","author":"Nichol","year":"2001","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199601010-00022","article-title":"Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"21","author":"Katz","year":"1996","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study","volume":"30","author":"Atlas","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.11.010","article-title":"Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation","volume":"12","author":"Martin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46","article-title":"Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures","volume":"32","author":"Martin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0492-x","article-title":"High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"17","author":"Verhoof","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1 Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0105","first-page":"ONS108","article-title":"A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis","volume":"63","author":"Yano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E8","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.FOCUS1047","article-title":"Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-STOP device","volume":"28","author":"Bowers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0115","volume":"vol. 61","author":"Arias","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318235457b","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation","volume":"36","author":"Tosteson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa054744","article-title":"The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960\u20132000","volume":"355","author":"Cutler","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0130","article-title":"Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial","volume":"2012","author":"Miller","year":"2012","journal-title":"Pain Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.08.419","article-title":"Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"11","author":"Postacchini","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2199","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-013-2006-2","article-title":"Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex)","volume":"37","author":"Xu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.07.004","article-title":"Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up","volume":"124","author":"Puzzilli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2015","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2790-9","article-title":"Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life","volume":"22","author":"Beyer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1263108","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer","volume":"53","author":"Sobottke","year":"2010","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.053","article-title":"Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study","volume":"14","author":"Patil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0165","article-title":"Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"9","author":"Wu","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0170","first-page":"336","article-title":"Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study","volume":"27","author":"Richter","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2016.01.07","article-title":"Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2","author":"Phan","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0180","article-title":"X-STOP versus decompression for neurogenic claudication: economic and clinical analysis","volume":"1","author":"Kondrashov","year":"2007","journal-title":"Internet J Min Invasive Spinal Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.14444\/2028","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative care, laminectomy, and the superion interspinous spacer","volume":"9","author":"Parker","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017309440?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017309440?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,28]],"date-time":"2018-08-28T05:21:45Z","timestamp":1535433705000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1529943017309440"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S1529943017309440"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1529-9430","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.246","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}