{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T07:26:44Z","timestamp":1791617204032,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":77,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100019446","name":"RTI Surgical","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100019446","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100002718","name":"Cervical Spine Research Society","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100002718","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100003202","name":"North American Spine Society","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100003202","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004374","name":"Medtronic","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004374","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100013744","name":"International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100013744","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]],"date-time":"2021-08-20T00:32:29Z","timestamp":1629419549000},"page":"353-369","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"22","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9969-5815","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Athan G.","family":"Zavras","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas Barrett","family":"Sullivan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kern","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank M.","family":"Phillips","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew W.","family":"Colman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2431","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211150-00003","article-title":"Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion","volume":"27","author":"Eck","year":"2002","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199904010-00011","article-title":"Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion","volume":"24","author":"Matsunaga","year":"1999","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d","article-title":"Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study","volume":"35","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2613-4","article-title":"What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT","volume":"22","author":"Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-014-2125-2","article-title":"Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies","volume":"135","author":"Luo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.10.032","article-title":"Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Shriver","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.006","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics","volume":"10","author":"Cunningham","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00029","article-title":"Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"93","author":"Garrido","year":"2011","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1520","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1085-7","article-title":"Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty","volume":"18","author":"Finn","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Phillips","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0011","first-page":"317","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the prestige LP cervical disc at a single level","volume":"31","author":"Gornet","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg: Spine SPI"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.14444\/4031","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the mobi-C\u00a9 cervical disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up","volume":"11","author":"Radcliff","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002907","article-title":"Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial","volume":"44","author":"Lavelle","year":"2019","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"26","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2223","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000060","article-title":"Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site","volume":"38","author":"Hacker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.10.FOCUS16393","article-title":"Bone loss of vertebral bodies at the operative segment after cervical arthroplasty: a potential complication?","volume":"42","author":"Heo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.10.013","article-title":"Comparison of adverse events between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a 10-year follow-up","volume":"21","author":"Loidolt","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2079","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2008.12.071","article-title":"Periprosthetic tissue reactions observed at revision of total intervertebral disc arthroplasty","volume":"30","author":"Punt","year":"2009","journal-title":"Biomaterials"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2006.05.012","article-title":"Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty","volume":"7","author":"Kurtz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cuor.2004.03.002","article-title":"Osteolysis\u2014basic science, incidence and diagnosis","volume":"18","author":"Agarwal","year":"2004","journal-title":"Curr Orthop"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E262","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318195dd60","article-title":"Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review","volume":"34","author":"Cavanaugh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200308000-00010","article-title":"Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement","volume":"16","author":"McAfee","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0022","first-page":"252","article-title":"Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc","volume":"28","author":"Coric","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0023","first-page":"317","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the prestige LP cervical disc at a single level","volume":"31","author":"Gornet","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0024","first-page":"253","volume":"21","author":"Phillips","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","article-title":"ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized US food and drug administration investigational device exemption study","volume":"97","author":"Janssen","year":"2015","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.14444\/5044","article-title":"Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical artificial disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"12","author":"Vaccaro","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0027","first-page":"516","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"21","author":"Burkus","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0028","first-page":"508","article-title":"Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Gornet","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0029","first-page":"98","article-title":"Duggal N. Complications with cervical arthroplasty","volume":"4","author":"Pickett","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E515","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000170","article-title":"Cervical disk replacement with discover versus fusion in a single-level cervical disk disease","volume":"30","author":"Ro\u017eankovi\u0107","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2389","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-3947-2","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study","volume":"42","author":"Song","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4897-2","article-title":"10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis","volume":"26","author":"Dejaegher","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1017-6","article-title":"Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C\u00ae) with up to 2 years of follow-up","volume":"18","author":"Beaurain","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5204-6","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement","volume":"26","author":"Mehren","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0035","first-page":"752","article-title":"Differences between C3\u20134 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up","volume":"24","author":"Chang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","article-title":"Bartels RH. What's the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Donk","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2371","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06069-z","article-title":"Clinical and radiological evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up: a prospective study of 384 patients","volume":"28","author":"Dufour","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12565","article-title":"Comparison of 10-year outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty for myelopathy and radiculopathy","volume":"11","author":"Han","year":"2019","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-008-1552-7","article-title":"Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease\u2013clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan\u00ae cervical disc prosthesis","volume":"150","author":"Heidecke","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1722-9","article-title":"Comparison between single-and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement","volume":"20","author":"Huppert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0041","first-page":"323","article-title":"Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes","volume":"30","author":"MacDowall","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36381","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis: a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up","volume":"98","author":"Hou","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0043","first-page":"556","article-title":"Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome","volume":"25","author":"Meisel","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4922-5","article-title":"The Norwegian cervical arthroplasty trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion\u2014a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study","volume":"26","author":"Sundseth","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1259-3","article-title":"Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up","volume":"19","author":"Suchomel","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.14444\/6030","article-title":"Quality of life following prestige LP cervical disc arthroplasty in a prospective multicountry study","volume":"13","author":"Stulik","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2897-z","article-title":"Cervical arthroplasty with discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion","volume":"22","author":"Li","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E204","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000604","article-title":"Cervical artificial disc replacement with discover prosthesis does not reduce the midterm risk of heterotopic ossification","volume":"31","author":"Miao","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa","article-title":"Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China","volume":"37","author":"Zhang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1424-1","article-title":"Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis","volume":"24","author":"Zhang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0051","first-page":"2969","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disc arthroplasty: over three years follow-up cohort study","volume":"123","author":"Tian","year":"2010","journal-title":"Chin Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.01.037","article-title":"Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis","volume":"11","author":"Du","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-016-0765-0","article-title":"Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review","volume":"41","author":"Staudt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182797592","article-title":"Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Delamarter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.04.004","article-title":"Revision surgeries following artificial disc replacement of cervical spine","volume":"50","author":"Park","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0056","series-title":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","article-title":"Kinematics of cervical and lumbar total disc replacement","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0057","first-page":"61","article-title":"Biology of implant osseointegration","volume":"9","author":"Mavrogenis","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA","article-title":"Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level","volume":"28","author":"Goffin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1757-7861.2010.00069.x","article-title":"Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement","volume":"2","author":"Cao","year":"2010","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.4055\/cios.2011.3.1.16","article-title":"Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage","volume":"3","author":"Yang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.07.007","article-title":"Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence","volume":"5","author":"van Jonbergen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000400","article-title":"Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment","volume":"39","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"17S","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S27","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000175192.55139.69","article-title":"Cervical disc replacement","volume":"30","author":"Phillips","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005","article-title":"Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a federal drug administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial","volume":"12","author":"Singh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E202","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002799","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcome of a new total cervical disc replacement design","volume":"44","author":"Mehren","year":"2019","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06","article-title":"M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection","volume":"5","author":"Xia","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00077","article-title":"Ceramic fracture following cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report","volume":"93","author":"Nguyen","year":"2011","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E814","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182477d85","article-title":"Implant failure of Bryan cervical disc due to broken polyurethane sheath: a case report","volume":"37","author":"Fan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0069","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200004000-00004","article-title":"Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement : minimum twenty-five-year follow-up*","volume":"82","author":"Callaghan","year":"2000","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199906000-00018","article-title":"Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement","volume":"363","author":"Sochart","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0071","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2002.33664","article-title":"A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty","volume":"17","author":"Dumbleton","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0072","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2004.09.035","article-title":"Third-body wear testing of a highly cross-linked acetabular liner: the effect of large femoral head size in the presence of particulate poly (methyl-methacrylate) debris","volume":"20","author":"Bragdon","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0073","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.10471","article-title":"Wear of conventional and cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished and roughened CoCr femoral heads in a biaxial hip simulator","volume":"63","author":"Saikko","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Biomed Mater Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orthres.2003.08.013","article-title":"The effectiveness of polyethylene versus titanium particles in inducing osteolysis in vivo","volume":"22","author":"von Knoch","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/0883-5403(92)90050-Z","article-title":"Polyethylenedebris-induced osteolysis and loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a cause of late failure","volume":"7","author":"Cooper","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8046","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actbio.2013.05.005","article-title":"Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms","volume":"9","author":"Gallo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Biomater"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006_bib0077","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E973","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181fd863b","article-title":"Progressive vertebral body osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"36","author":"Tumial\u00e1n","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine."}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943021008561?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943021008561?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T21:35:39Z","timestamp":1761514539000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1529943021008561"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":77,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1529943021008561"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1529-9430","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.08.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}