{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,9]],"date-time":"2026-11-09T16:55:09Z","timestamp":1794243309196,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,1]],"date-time":"2024-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,1]],"date-time":"2024-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,24]],"date-time":"2023-11-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1700784000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,25]],"date-time":"2023-11-25T07:26:16Z","timestamp":1700897176000},"page":"100928","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Women\u2019s experiences of consent to induction of labour: A qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Clodagh","family":"Kelly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Melissa","family":"Whitten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Kennedy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Lanceley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5482-7973","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jacqueline","family":"Nicholls","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0005","unstructured":"Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0010","unstructured":"Re T (adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam.95."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0015","unstructured":"General Medical Council Good Medical Practice. London; 2019."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0020","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline NG207 \u2013 Induction of Labour. London; 2021. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng207\/chapter\/Recommendations#information-and-decision-making."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0025","unstructured":"Spencer v Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1058 (QB)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0030","unstructured":"CNZ v Royal Bath Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 19 (KB)."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1891\/1058-1243.23.1.9","article-title":"Major survey findings of listening to mothers (SM) III: pregnancy and birth: report of the third National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences","volume":"23","author":"Declercq","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Educ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1097\/JPN.0000000000000182","article-title":"Women's voices in maternity care: the triad of shared decision making, informed consent, and evidence-based practices","volume":"30","author":"Moore","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinat Neonatal Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1518-y","article-title":"Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study","volume":"17","author":"Nippita","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coates D, Goodfellow A, Sinclair L. Induction of labour: experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians. Women Birth 2020;33(1).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2019.06.002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0055","unstructured":"Duce v Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 1307."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0060","unstructured":"McCulloch & Ors v Forth Valley Health Board (Scotland) [2023] UKSC 26."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0065","unstructured":"WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Induction of labour data. Geneva: World health Organization; 2010. Available at: http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/topics\/ best practices\/global_survey."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0070","unstructured":"Inducing Labour NHS 2017 [Internet]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nhs.uk\/conditions\/pregnancy-and-baby\/induction-labour\/."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0075","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2009.06.002","article-title":"Women's experiences of being induced for post-date pregnancy","volume":"23","author":"Gatward","year":"2010","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12310","article-title":"In labor or in limbo? The experiences of women undergoing induction of labor in hospital: findings of a qualitative study","volume":"45","author":"Jay","year":"2018","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0090","unstructured":"Smith JA, Osborn M. [2nd edition]: interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods. London: Sage; 2008."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","article-title":"Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups","volume":"19","author":"Tong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.008","article-title":"Consent in pregnancy: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of women and their healthcare professionals","volume":"238","author":"Nicholls","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ando H, Cousins R, Young C. Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: development and refinement of a codebook. Compreh Psychol 2014;3. doi: 10.2466\/03.CP.3.4.","DOI":"10.2466\/03.CP.3.4"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robb K, Hanna D, Zembrzuska M, Rosenbaum M. Using virtual methods to teach Clinical Communication Skills: a survey. Patient Educ Counsel 109(Suppl. 21). doi: .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2022.10.056"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12231","article-title":"Patient-perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction and cesarean delivery: a population-based survey of U.S. women","volume":"50","author":"Jou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1080\/02646839708404542","article-title":"Being a \u2018good mother\u2019","volume":"15","author":"Brown","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Reprod Infant Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0130","unstructured":"Slade A, Cohen LJ, et al. The psychology and psychopathology of pregnancy: reorganization and transformation. Handbook Infant Ment Health 2009;3."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore JE, Kane Low L, Titler MG, Dalton VK, Sampselle CM. Moving toward patient-centered care: Women\u2019s decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process. Birth 2014;41(2):138\u201346.51.","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12080"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2014.22.2.105","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of induction of labour for post-date pregnancy","volume":"22","author":"Murtagh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0145","unstructured":"Abrams J. The illusion of autonomy in women's medical decision-making. Florida State University Law Review 2015;42(1). [Internet]. Available from: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2545422#references-widget."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2013.10.031","article-title":"Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making","volume":"94","author":"Joseph-Williams","year":"2014","journal-title":"Patient Educ Counsel"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2586","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-019-04860-8","article-title":"Communicating uncertainty: a narrative review and framework for future research","volume":"34","author":"Simpkin","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"7226","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7226.50","article-title":"Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research","volume":"320","author":"Mays","year":"2000","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0165","first-page":"21","article-title":"Indication for labour induction and predictors for failed induction at KMCTH","volume":"7","author":"Rayamajhi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s00737-019-00968-2","article-title":"Delivery mode is associated with maternal mental health following childbirth","volume":"22","author":"Dekel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Womens Ment Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-191","article-title":"The influence of women's preferences and actual mode of delivery on post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth: a population-based, longitudinal study","volume":"14","author":"Garthus-Niegel","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.08.010","article-title":"Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: an integrative review","volume":"29","author":"Healy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928_b0185","first-page":"1","article-title":"Getting specific about qualitative research generalisability","volume":"5","author":"Chenail","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ethnogr Qual Res"}],"container-title":["Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877575623001180?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877575623001180?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T05:01:34Z","timestamp":1761800494000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1877575623001180"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"references-count":37,"alternative-id":["S1877575623001180"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928","relation":{},"ISSN":["1877-5756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1877-5756","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Women\u2019s experiences of consent to induction of labour: A qualitative study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100928"}}