{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,11]],"date-time":"2026-11-11T10:27:07Z","timestamp":1794392827638,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,12,1]],"date-time":"2026-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1796083200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,12,1]],"date-time":"2026-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1796083200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788998400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T15:20:50Z","timestamp":1789226450000},"page":"101278","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Reflecting on the evidence-practice gap - a participatory approach in use of CTG in midwifery practice"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"Ingrid","family":"Jepsen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacob \u00d8.","family":"Madsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard","family":"Farlie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie Z.","family":"Ovesen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rikke D.","family":"Maimburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E468","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.202538","article-title":"Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","volume":"193","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2021","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006066.pub3","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.019","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: intermittent auscultation","volume":"131","author":"Lewis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0020","series-title":"Intrapartum fetal surveillance-Indications","author":"Nordentoft","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0025","series-title":"INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF MIDWIVES essential competencies for basic midwifery practice","author":"International Confederation of Midwives (ICM)","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0030","series-title":"WHO recommendations on intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience","author":"WHO","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006066","article-title":"DDGG. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"3","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2022.01.003","article-title":"The overuse of intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) for low-risk women: an actor-network theory analysis of data from focus groups","volume":"35","author":"Jepsen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2020.100552","article-title":"Recommendations for intrapartum fetal monitoring are not followed in low-risk women: a study from two Norwegian birth units | Elsevier enhanced reader","volume":"26","author":"Rosset","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0050","article-title":"The art of midwifery: lost to technology?","volume":"11","author":"Cowie","year":"1998","journal-title":"Aust Coll Midwives Inc J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1097\/JPN.0000000000000453","article-title":"Maternity providers\u2019 perspectives on barriers to utilization of intermittent fetal monitoring: a qualitative study","volume":"34","author":"Chuey","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Perinat Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1891\/2156-5287.6.2.68","article-title":"An exploration of the views and experiences of midwives using intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in labor","volume":"6","author":"Hill","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1517-z","article-title":"Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses\u2019 fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework","volume":"17","author":"Patey","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-166","article-title":"Professionals\u2019 views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis","volume":"12","author":"Smith","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0075","series-title":"Implementation research in health\u00a0: a practical guide","author":"Peters","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-022-08079-y","article-title":"The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review","volume":"22","author":"Grindell","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0085","series-title":"Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice","author":"Brownson","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0090","series-title":"User innovation management: A handbook","author":"Kanstrup","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0095","series-title":"Participatory design","first-page":"5","article-title":"What is participatory design?","volume":"1","author":"B\u00f8dker","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0100","series-title":"The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications","article-title":"Participatory design: the third space in human- computer interaction","author":"Muller","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0105","series-title":"Personas-User Focused Design Human-Computer Interaction Series","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-4084-9","author":"Nielsen","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nedt.2003.10.001","article-title":"Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness","volume":"24","author":"Graneheim","year":"2004","journal-title":"Nurse Educ Today"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nedt.2017.06.002","article-title":"Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper","volume":"56","author":"Graneheim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nurse Educ Today"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1891\/2156-5287.2.2.126","article-title":"Risk in maternity care: a concept analysis","volume":"2","author":"Smith","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2021.100617","article-title":"\u2018Watchful attendance\u2019 during labour and birth","volume":"28","author":"de Jonge","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2024.101837","article-title":"Do women have a choice when it comes to fetal monitoring? Perceptions of information provided and choice of fetal monitoring in Australia: a national survey","volume":"37","author":"Levett","year":"2024","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2022.09.004","article-title":"The social organisation of decision-making about intrapartum fetal monitoring: an institutional ethnography","volume":"36","author":"Small","year":"2023","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1080\/16549716.2023.2275866","article-title":"Putting co-creation into practice: lessons learned from developing a midwife-led quality improvement intervention","volume":"16","author":"Blomgren","year":"2023","journal-title":"Glob Health Action"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0145","article-title":"Nurses\u2019 and physicians\u2019 ideas on initiatives for effective use of the early warning score: a participatory study","volume":"10","author":"M\u00f8lgaard","year":"2023","journal-title":"Glob Qual Nurs Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S403243","article-title":"Co-design as enabling factor for patient-centred healthcare: a bibliometric literature review","volume":"15","author":"Silvola","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clinicoecon Outcomes Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278_bb0155","article-title":"Abtahi 14,15 | Malin Holzmann 16,17 | Samuel Boudet 18 | Agathe Houz\u00e9 de l","volume":"132","author":"Lovers","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int. J. Obstetrics & Gynaecol."}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101283","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000}}],"container-title":["Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877575626000960?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877575626000960?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,11]],"date-time":"2026-11-11T10:14:18Z","timestamp":1794392058000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1877575626000960"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["S1877575626000960"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278","relation":{},"ISSN":["1877-5756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1877-5756","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Reflecting on the evidence-practice gap - a participatory approach in use of CTG in midwifery practice","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.srhc.2026.101278","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101278"}}