{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T21:12:24Z","timestamp":1790197944705,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":115,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","surgjournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,20]],"date-time":"2021-05-20T06:13:34Z","timestamp":1621491214000},"page":"994-1003","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"170","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2002-5390","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joseph J.","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6343-176X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicholas L.","family":"Syn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cheryl","family":"Chong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hwee Leong","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6235-9359","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julia Yu Xin","family":"Ng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3083-4423","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ashton","family":"Yap","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3364-3147","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tousif","family":"Kabir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8218-4576","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brian K.P.","family":"Goh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199402103300607","article-title":"Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland","volume":"330","author":"Steiner","year":"1994","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-004-0471-1","article-title":"The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"389","author":"Bittner","year":"2004","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib3","first-page":"1139","article-title":"Chol\u00e9cystectomie par mini-laparotomie","volume":"11","author":"Dubois","year":"1982","journal-title":"Nouv Presse Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib4","first-page":"59","article-title":"Mini-laparoscopy: Instruments and economics","volume":"27","author":"Shadduck","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","article-title":"Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range","volume":"14","author":"Wan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006","article-title":"Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results","volume":"59","author":"Furukawa","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1116","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)93148-G","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group","volume":"340","author":"Barkun","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"Suppl 4","key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib10","first-page":"S243","article-title":"[Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study]","volume":"92","author":"Jan","year":"1993","journal-title":"J\u00a0Formos Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib11","first-page":"217","article-title":"Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study","volume":"159","author":"Trondsen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Eur J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(94)90932-6","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial","volume":"343","author":"McMahon","year":"1994","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800821027","article-title":"Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy","volume":"82","author":"McGinn","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib14","first-page":"177","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective randomised study of laparoscopic v. open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis","volume":"34","author":"Huang","year":"1996","journal-title":"S\u00a0Afr J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90143-9","article-title":"Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy","volume":"347","author":"Majeed","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00012282","article-title":"Emergency minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective randomized trial\u2014implications for the laparoscopic era","volume":"21","author":"Assalia","year":"1997","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib17","first-page":"467","article-title":"Systemic stress response after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a randomized trial","volume":"84","author":"Karayiannakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib18","first-page":"1683","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy","volume":"84","author":"Schmitz","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)08447-X","article-title":"Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis","volume":"351","author":"Kiviluoto","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2000.10.249","article-title":"Comparison of postoperative acute-phase reactants in patients who underwent laparoscopic v open cholecystectomy: a randomized study","volume":"10","author":"Demirer","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1080\/110241500750008961","article-title":"Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response","volume":"166","author":"Hendolin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640020063","article-title":"Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"14","author":"Schwenk","year":"2000","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200112000-00005","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study","volume":"234","author":"Ros","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2001.01636.x","article-title":"Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"88","author":"Cheah","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib25","first-page":"138","article-title":"Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial","volume":"46","author":"Look","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0R Coll Surg Edinb"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1437","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-002-6351-3","article-title":"Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? Prospective randomized study comparing minisite and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies","volume":"26","author":"Alponat","year":"2002","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib27","first-page":"16458","article-title":"Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopiccholecystectomy","author":"Bisgaard","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8568-5","article-title":"Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"17","author":"Ainslie","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1345","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4315","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments","volume":"90","author":"Sarli","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib30","first-page":"44","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis","volume":"92","author":"Johansson","year":"2005","journal-title":"B\u00a0J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.140.12.1178","article-title":"Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial","volume":"140","author":"Novitsky","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2513","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v11.i16.2513","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension","volume":"11","author":"Ji","year":"2005","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-2280-6","article-title":"Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity","volume":"20","author":"Harju","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1080\/00365510601011585","article-title":"Systemic immune response after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective randomized study","volume":"67","author":"Boo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Scand J Clin Lab Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.143.4.371","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: primary and clinical outcomes","volume":"143","author":"Keus","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.10.013","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: A prospective randomized study","volume":"7","author":"El-Awadi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2009.0476","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a prospective, randomized study","volume":"20","author":"Hamad","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1177\/145749691009900306","article-title":"Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: A prospective randomised study","volume":"99","author":"Harju","year":"2010","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7087","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib40","first-page":"595","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a new advantage of gallbladder surgery","volume":"34","author":"Rasic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Coll Antropol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-0887-3","article-title":"Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"24","author":"Tsimoyiannis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2010.11.885","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study","volume":"166","author":"Aprea","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7689","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Bucher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes","volume":"21","author":"Cao","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009","article-title":"Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"202","author":"Lai","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib46","unstructured":"Leung D, Denham W, Salabat M, Butt Z, Barrera E, Ujiki M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in similar short-term post-operative pain and quality of life scores when compared to multi-incision: A prospective randomized blinded comparison. Presented at: 2011 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES); 30 March\u20132 April, 2011; San Antonio, Texas, USA."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019","article-title":"Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial","volume":"202","author":"Lirici","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib48","unstructured":"Moran M, Gundogdu E, Dizen H, Akgun A, Ozmen M. Single vs two vs three vs four incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Presented at: 18th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES); June 16\u201319, 2010; Geneva, Switzerland ."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182192f89","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"254","author":"Ma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib50","first-page":"90641","article-title":"studio prospectivo aleatorizado comparativo entre colecistectom\u00eda laparosc\u00f3pica versus colecistectom\u00eda por puerto \u00fanico en r\u00e9gimen ambulatorio","author":"Herrero Fonollosa","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cir Esp"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib51","first-page":"186","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, prospective trial","volume":"26","author":"Sappington","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182631a9a","article-title":"Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"22","author":"Sasaki","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182402448","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"22","author":"Sinan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2253-0","article-title":"Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study","volume":"26","author":"Solomon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib55","first-page":"80115","article-title":"Minilaparotomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a randomized clinical trial","author":"Vel\u00e1zquez-Mendoza","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cir Cir"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.97586","article-title":"Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases","volume":"8","author":"Vilallonga","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.3109\/13645706.2011.577787","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study","volume":"21","author":"Zheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2625-5","article-title":"Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"27","author":"Abd Ellatif","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3616","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2933-4","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is smaller better?","volume":"27","author":"Bignell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3108","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2914-7","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective trial","volume":"27","author":"Brown","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib61","first-page":"23109","article-title":"Mini-laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial","author":"de Carvalho","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.4174\/jkss.2013.85.6.275","article-title":"The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study","volume":"85","author":"Deveci","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Korean Surg Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2589-5","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Luna","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2556-1","article-title":"Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Madureira","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024","volume":"216","author":"Marks","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4284","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3044-y","article-title":"Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study","volume":"27","author":"Noguera","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i3.394","article-title":"Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study","volume":"19","author":"Pan","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"886","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9133","article-title":"Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"Rosenm\u00fcller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9003","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"Saad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.4174\/jkss.2013.85.4.149","article-title":"Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques on postoperative pain: a prospective randomized study","volume":"85","author":"Yilmaz","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Korean Surg Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2013.04.043","article-title":"Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients","volume":"154","author":"Zapf","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib72","unstructured":"Artis T, Kucuk C, Akay A, Zararsiz G, Sozuer E. Prospective randomized study comparing single incision vs. standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Presented at: 21st International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES); June 19\u201322, 2013; Vienna, Austria."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12071","article-title":"Evaluation of pain scores after single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized control trial in a rural Indian population","volume":"7","author":"Borle","year":"2014","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9393","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"101","author":"J\u00f8rgensen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.9738\/INTSURG-D-13-00234.1","article-title":"One, two, or three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?","volume":"99","author":"Justo-Janeiro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.3109\/08941939.2013.856497","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"Khorgami","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Invest Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1177\/1541931214581267","article-title":"A\u00a0preliminary study of surgeon stress measures during randomized controlled trials of 4-port vs. single incision cholecystectomies","volume":"58","author":"Lowndes","year":"2014","journal-title":"Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.3109\/00365521.2015.1091496","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups","volume":"51","author":"Aspinen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scand J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022","article-title":"A\u00a0double-blinded randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of minimally invasive procedures using patient-reported outcomes","volume":"221","author":"Bingener","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-014-2903-6","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"39","author":"Chang","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib81","first-page":"1153","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study","volume":"20","author":"Dabbagh","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Res Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3310","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.171422","article-title":"Randomized trial of immediate postoperative pain following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"128","author":"Guo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.4253\/wjge.v7.i5.540","article-title":"Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial","volume":"7","author":"He","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001474","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)","volume":"262","author":"Lurje","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.17219\/acem\/43713","article-title":"Single port vs. four port cholecystectomy--randomized trial on quality of life","volume":"24","author":"Sulu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Adv Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib86","first-page":"7746","article-title":"Comparison of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fourth-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"8","author":"Ye","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4332-5","article-title":"Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Abdelrahman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib88","unstructured":"Ahmed W, Gaber A, Elmoghazy W, Elsharkawy K. Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Presented at: 23rd International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES); June 3\u20136, 2015; Bucharest, Romania."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib89","first-page":"PC06","article-title":"A\u00a0comparative study of single incision versus conventional four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"10","author":"Hajong","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-015-1182-7","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial","volume":"46","author":"Partelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ciresp.2015.03.003","article-title":"Colecistectom\u00eda laparosc\u00f3pica ambulatoria por minilaparoscopia versus colecistectom\u00eda laparosc\u00f3pica ambulatoria multipuerto tradicional. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado","volume":"94","author":"Planells Roig","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cir Esp"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.06.045","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel instrument to that using a common instrument","volume":"32","author":"Zhao","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2872","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5298-7","article-title":"Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial)","volume":"31","author":"Arezzo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib94","first-page":"312299","article-title":"Impact of miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recovery of physical activity: a randomized trial","author":"Alhashemi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2017.01.006","article-title":"Single-incision versus 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones: A prospective randomized study","volume":"162","author":"Omar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.186686","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Less scar, less pain","volume":"13","author":"Tyagi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib97","unstructured":"Raakow J, Klein D, Atakan A, Pratschke J, Raakow R. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up. Presented at: 26th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES); May 30\u2013June 1, 2018; London, United Kingdom."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2018.08.004","article-title":"Quality of life after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, clinical trial","volume":"165","author":"Ito","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib99","first-page":"10","article-title":"Comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis","volume":"1","author":"Koirala","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0KIST Med Coll"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20191275","article-title":"Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"6","author":"Kumar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hbpd.2019.04.008","article-title":"Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory setting","volume":"18","author":"Qu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib102","first-page":"243","article-title":"Outcome of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis - A randomized control trial","volume":"8","author":"Rizwi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pakistan J Med Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1159\/000486455","article-title":"Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus needlescopic cholecystectomy: A single institutional randomized clinical trial","volume":"36","author":"Umemura","year":"2019","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib104","first-page":"122","article-title":"Four port versus single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"15","author":"Mehmood","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Surg Pakistan (Int)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2175","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5974-2","article-title":"Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis","volume":"32","author":"Pucher","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4315","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07198-8","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"34","author":"Lyu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2051-0","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Markar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4389","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-4757-5","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Lirici","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2006.0051","article-title":"Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"17","author":"Hosono","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2009.04945.x","article-title":"Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis","volume":"79","author":"Sajid","year":"2009","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318207bf52","article-title":"Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"253","author":"Thakur","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12730","article-title":"Needlescopic surgery for very low rectal cancer with no abdominal skin incision","volume":"13","author":"Fukuoka","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-1839-2","article-title":"Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery","volume":"26","author":"Tagaya","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib114","first-page":"CD006229","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis","volume":"4","author":"Keus","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004_bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.304.6826.559","article-title":"Laparoscopic or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy?","volume":"304","author":"Baxter","year":"1992","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0039606021003299?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0039606021003299?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,22]],"date-time":"2025-09-22T11:00:33Z","timestamp":1758538833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0039606021003299"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"references-count":115,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0039606021003299"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-6060"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-6060","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}