{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T21:01:34Z","timestamp":1788555694985,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,1]],"date-time":"2019-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1572566400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,1]],"date-time":"2019-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1572566400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,19]],"date-time":"2019-09-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1568851200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,20]],"date-time":"2019-11-20T16:52:58Z","timestamp":1574268778000},"page":"784-787","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"58","author":[{"given":"Ioannis","family":"Tsakiridis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Apostolos","family":"Mamopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Apostolos","family":"Athanasiadis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Themistoklis","family":"Dagklis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539507001878","article-title":"Premature cervical change and the use of cervical cerclage","volume":"18","author":"Chandiramani","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90889-3","article-title":"A\u00a0multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age\u2014specific neonatal mortality","volume":"168","author":"Copper","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"12","author":"Heath","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90014-0","article-title":"Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes","volume":"171","author":"Gomez","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib5","article-title":"Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery","volume":"2013","author":"Berghella","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(86)80006-0","article-title":"Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy","volume":"155","author":"Brown","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02060402.x","article-title":"Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography","volume":"2","author":"Okitsu","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870190204","article-title":"Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy","volume":"19","author":"Andersen","year":"1991","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00369.x","article-title":"Cervical assessment at the routine 23-week scan: standardizing techniques","volume":"17","author":"To","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.9.1305","article-title":"Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?","volume":"27","author":"Saul","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x","article-title":"Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population","volume":"50","author":"Stone","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.021","article-title":"Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?","volume":"208","author":"Friedman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1990.9.12.717","article-title":"Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix: correlation with digital examination","volume":"9","author":"Mahony","year":"1990","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00027-O","article-title":"The correlation between transperineal sonography and digital examination in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix","volume":"85","author":"Richey","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70177-2","article-title":"Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation","volume":"179","author":"Kurtzman","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00211-7","article-title":"Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery","volume":"59","author":"\u00d6nderoglu","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib18","first-page":"71","article-title":"Cervical sonography: a review","volume":"11","author":"Sonek","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet\u00a0Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.04.021","article-title":"Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"207","author":"Parry","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.013","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention","volume":"209","author":"Miller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1682","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.657278","article-title":"Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy\u00a0fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix","volume":"25","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00019.x","article-title":"Cervical length measurement: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach","volume":"18","author":"Westerway","year":"2015","journal-title":"Australas J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14742","article-title":"How to measure cervical length","volume":"45","author":"Kagan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70338-1","article-title":"Can a \u201csnapshot\u201d sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor?","volume":"174","author":"Timor-Tritsch","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.576","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data","volume":"218","author":"Romero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.10.1721","article-title":"Comparison of cervical lengths using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in midpregnancy","volume":"32","author":"Roh","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12204","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches","volume":"54","author":"Marren","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x","article-title":"Cervical assessment at the routine\u00a023-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography","volume":"15","author":"To","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.03.007","article-title":"The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: comparison with transvaginal measurement","volume":"54","author":"Peng","year":"2015","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2013.00378","article-title":"Is transabdominal ultrasound scanning of cervical measurement in mid-trimester pregnancy a useful alternative to transvaginal ultrasound scan?","volume":"14","author":"Chaudhury","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"}],"container-title":["Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1028455919302141?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1028455919302141?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T18:18:01Z","timestamp":1760897881000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1028455919302141"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S1028455919302141"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1028-4559"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1028-4559","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}