{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T15:46:16Z","timestamp":1770997576847,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]],"date-time":"2020-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1593561600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]],"date-time":"2020-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1593561600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,14]],"date-time":"2020-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1589414400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,8]],"date-time":"2020-07-08T10:54:30Z","timestamp":1594205670000},"page":"481-488","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"59","author":[{"given":"Tanitra","family":"Tantitamit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kuan-Gen","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chyi-Long","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib1","author":"World Health Organization"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2017.0022","article-title":"Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Zhao","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.06.009","article-title":"Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"138","author":"Shazly","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0193033","article-title":"Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer","volume":"13","author":"Jin","year":"2018","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-015-1818-4","article-title":"Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Canc"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"379","author":"Ramirez","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60523-3","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer","volume":"9","author":"Lee","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.11.011","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer","volume":"105","author":"Li","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.016","article-title":"A\u00a0comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study","volume":"156","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318256ccc5","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"119","author":"Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.081","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"207","author":"Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdr360","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study","volume":"23","author":"Nam","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23347","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer","volume":"108","author":"Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000052","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater","volume":"24","author":"Kong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000160","article-title":"Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management","volume":"24","author":"Chen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"issue":"30","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1264","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000001264","article-title":"Total laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: an observational study of 13-year experience","volume":"94","author":"Xiao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"issue":"36","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000008005","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study","volume":"96","author":"Zhang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltim)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5903","DOI":"10.2147\/OTT.S156064","article-title":"Laparoscopic procedure compared with open radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer: a retrospective study","volume":"11","author":"Guo","year":"2018","journal-title":"OncoTargets Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-8258(03)00518-3","article-title":"Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy","volume":"91","author":"Abu-Rustum","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.04.027","article-title":"Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy","volume":"106","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04","article-title":"Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"110","author":"Frumovitz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.01.011","article-title":"Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"109","author":"Magrina","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-009-0342-7","article-title":"Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience","volume":"16","author":"Malzoni","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.03.009","article-title":"A\u00a0case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"113","author":"Estape","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.08.001","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology","volume":"123","author":"Soliman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.02.002","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital","volume":"121","author":"Sert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.4293\/108680811X13022985132218","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy","volume":"15","author":"Taylor","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Soc Laparoendosc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2012.06.031","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"127","author":"Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2013.0514","article-title":"Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison","volume":"24","author":"Toptas","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.03.018","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis","volume":"21","author":"Bogani","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.10.058","article-title":"Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations","volume":"41","author":"Ditto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000627","article-title":"Recurrence of early stage cervical cancer after laparoscopic versus open radical surgery","volume":"26","author":"Laterza","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2015.09.004","article-title":"Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience","volume":"25","author":"Mendivil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2103763","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/2103763","article-title":"Safety and cost considerations during the introduction period of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy","volume":"2017","author":"Anagnostopoulos","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.06.007","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy: efficacy and safety in the dawn of minimally invasive techniques","volume":"26","author":"Gil-Moreno","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001254","article-title":"Comparison of different surgical approaches for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients: a multi-institution study and a review of the literature","volume":"28","author":"Corrado","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1606","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2000.18.8.1606","article-title":"Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix","volume":"18","author":"Peters","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1999.5387","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study","volume":"73","author":"Sedlis","year":"1999","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.04.001","article-title":"Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience","volume":"14","author":"Malzoni","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.10.048","article-title":"Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study","volume":"41","author":"Corrado","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0655-8112","article-title":"Comment on the LACC trial investigating early-stage cervical cancer by the uterus commission of the study group for gynecologic oncology (AGO) and the study group for gynecologic endoscopy (AGE) of the German society for gynecology and obstetrics (DGGG)","volume":"78","author":"Hillemanns","year":"2018","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib42","article-title":"How should gynecologic oncologists react to the unexpected results of LACC trial?","volume":"29","author":"Park","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_132_18","article-title":"Minimally invasive therapy for cancer: it is time to take actions for training system in minimally invasive therapy after LACC report","volume":"8","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.02.005","article-title":"Clinical trial should be more rigorous","volume":"58","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_75_19","article-title":"The statement of the asia-pacific association for gynecologic endoscopy and minimally invasive therapy for LACC study","volume":"8","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib46","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study","volume":"29","author":"Kimmig","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2018.120","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of abdominal versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the post dissemination era","volume":"51","author":"Kim","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"}],"container-title":["Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1028455920301029?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1028455920301029?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T18:17:45Z","timestamp":1760897865000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1028455920301029"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1028455920301029"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1028-4559"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1028-4559","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.05.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}