{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T02:02:50Z","timestamp":1787191370440,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,1]],"date-time":"2005-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1120176000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,1]],"date-time":"2005-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1120176000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Toxicology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,4,2]],"date-time":"2005-04-02T07:15:01Z","timestamp":1112426101000},"page":"165-175","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Quantitative comparison of the results obtained by the multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test and the non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay for various biocides"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"211","author":[{"given":"Tetsuo","family":"Yamano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mitsuru","family":"Shimizu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tsutomu","family":"Noda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.2340\/0001555575463469","article-title":"The guinea pig maximization test with a multiple dose design","volume":"75","author":"Andersen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Acta Dermatol. Venereol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06069.x","article-title":"Chloroacetamide as a cause of contact dermatitis in hairdressing","volume":"40","author":"Assier-Bonnet","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(97)00129-4","article-title":"Skin sensitisation thresholds: determination in predictive models","volume":"35","author":"Basketter","year":"1997","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(00)00169-1","article-title":"Skin sensitization, vehicle effects and the local node assay","volume":"39","author":"Basketter","year":"2001","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1093\/toxsci\/68.2.420","article-title":"Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay","volume":"68","author":"Gerberick","year":"2002","journal-title":"Toxicol. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2003.07.001","article-title":"Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data","volume":"38","author":"Griem","year":"2003","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1006\/taap.1998.8535","article-title":"An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions","volume":"153","author":"Homey","year":"1998","journal-title":"Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00476.x","article-title":"Patch testing with preservatives at St John's from 1982 to 1993","volume":"33","author":"Jacobs","year":"1993","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(99)00048-4","article-title":"Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations","volume":"37","author":"Kimber","year":"1999","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(03)00223-0","article-title":"Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals","volume":"41","author":"Kimber","year":"2003","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01346.x","article-title":"Occupational dermatitis to chloroacetamide","volume":"15","author":"Lama","year":"1986","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1038\/jid.1969.42","article-title":"The identification of contact allergens by animal assay: the guinea pig maximization test","volume":"52","author":"Magnusson","year":"1969","journal-title":"J. Invest. Dermatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2003.00058.x","article-title":"Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one without cross-sensitization to other isothiazolinones","volume":"48","author":"Muhn","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1994.tb01921.x","article-title":"A new protocol and criteria for quantitative determination of sensitisation potencies of chemicals by guinea pig maximization test","volume":"31","author":"Nakamura","year":"1994","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib15","first-page":"24","volume":"60","author":"Noda","year":"1998","journal-title":"Annu. Rep. Osaka City Inst. Public Health Environ. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib16","first-page":"13","article-title":"Toxicity study of hiba oil. Part 1: contact allergenicity of hiba oil in guinea pigs","volume":"44","author":"Noda","year":"2000","journal-title":"Seikatsu Eisei"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib17","first-page":"137","article-title":"Toxicity study of N-n-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one. Part 1: contact allergenicity of N-n-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one in guinea pigs","volume":"45","author":"Noda","year":"2001","journal-title":"Seikatsu Eisei"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib18","first-page":"396","article-title":"Allergenicity evaluation of chemicals for use in household products. Part VI: contact antimicrobial agents 2-chloroacetamide, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol and zinc bis (2-pyridylthio-1-oxide) in guinea pigs","volume":"48","author":"Noda","year":"2004","journal-title":"Seikatsu Eisei"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib19","first-page":"276","article-title":"Contact allergenicity of methylene-bis(thiocyanate) in the guinea pig maximization test","volume":"48","author":"Noda","year":"2004","journal-title":"Seikatsu Eisei"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1981.tb04058.x","article-title":"A modified technique of guinea pig testing to identify delayed hypersensitivity allergens","volume":"7","author":"Sato","year":"1981","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2004.02.002","article-title":"Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays","volume":"39","author":"Schneider","year":"2004","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2133.1998.02126.x","article-title":"Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides: results from a multicentre study","volume":"138","author":"Schnuch","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br. J. Dermatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib23","first-page":"129","volume":"44","author":"Shimizu","year":"2000","journal-title":"Seikatsu Eisei"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib24","first-page":"1","article-title":"Allergenicity evaluation of biocides for use in household products. Part V: contact allergenicity of 4,4\u2032-(tetramethylenedicarbonyldiamino) bis (1-decylpyridinium bromide) and N,N\u2032-hexamethylene bis (4-carbamoyl-1-decylpyridinium bromide) in guinea pigs","volume":"64","author":"Shimizu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Annu. Rep. Osaka City Inst. Public Health Environ. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4274(00)00315-5","article-title":"Development of non-radio isotopic endpoint of murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2\u2032-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation","volume":"119","author":"Takeyoshi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-483X(01)00425-5","article-title":"Comparison of dose\u2013responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay","volume":"167","author":"van Och","year":"2001","journal-title":"Toxicology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1248\/jhs.47.123","article-title":"Relative elicitation potencies of seven chemical allergens in the guinea pig maximization test","volume":"47","author":"Yamano","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Health Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1248\/jhs.47.331","article-title":"Allergenicity evaluation of N-(1-methylheptyl)-N\u2032-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine and 2-(thiocyanomethylthio) benzothiazole by the guinea pig maximization test","volume":"47","author":"Yamano","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Health Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-483X(03)00161-6","article-title":"Allergenicity evaluation of p-chloro-m-cresol and p-chloro-m-xylenol by non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay and multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test","volume":"190","author":"Yamano","year":"2003","journal-title":"Toxicology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2004.00361.x","article-title":"Allergenicity evaluation of Bioban CS-1135 in experimental animals","volume":"50","author":"Yamano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."}],"container-title":["Toxicology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0300483X05001447?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0300483X05001447?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,3]],"date-time":"2025-10-03T22:51:59Z","timestamp":1759531919000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0300483X05001447"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0300483X05001447"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["0300-483X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0300-483X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Quantitative comparison of the results obtained by the multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test and the non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay for various biocides","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Toxicology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}