{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T10:23:09Z","timestamp":1761128589493,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,1]],"date-time":"2007-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1175385600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","goldjournal.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,4,18]],"date-time":"2007-04-18T07:33:03Z","timestamp":1176881583000},"page":"629-632","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["How Small Can We Go? Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using 6F Nephroureteral Catheter"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Benjamin K.","family":"Canales","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthew E.","family":"Karlovsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Manoj","family":"Monga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E. James","family":"Seidmon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1089\/089277903767923218","article-title":"Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size","volume":"17","author":"Pietrow","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2000.14.735","article-title":"Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large bore or pigtail catheter?","volume":"14","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(01)01475-3","article-title":"Tail stent versus re-entry tube: a randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction","volume":"59","author":"Liatsikos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1089\/0892779041271580","article-title":"Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients","volume":"18","author":"Karami","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2004.18.547","article-title":"Cauterization of access tract for nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy","volume":"18","author":"Jou","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000130752.97414.c8","article-title":"A prospective randomized comparison of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless","volume":"172","author":"Desai","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)54118-X","article-title":"The universal ureteral stent","volume":"127","author":"Smith","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)48866-5","article-title":"The re-entry nephrostomy catheter for endourological applications","volume":"133","author":"Khasidy","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-4295(89)90255-0","article-title":"A new antegrade ureteral stent","volume":"34","author":"Seidmon","year":"1989","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2005.19.348","article-title":"Using and choosing a nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large or complex stone disease: a treatment strategy","volume":"19","author":"Kim","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1089\/089277904322836622","article-title":"Nephroureterostomy-drained percutaneous nephrolithotomy: modification combining safety with decreased morbidity","volume":"18","author":"Kader","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2004.18.743","article-title":"No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy","volume":"18","author":"Marcovich","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.10.081","article-title":"Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi","volume":"65","author":"Netto","year":"2005","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000138286.91104.2c","article-title":"Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: predictors of length of stay","volume":"172","author":"Matlaga","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1985.03360080066031","article-title":"Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs open surgery for renal calculi: a comparative study","volume":"254","author":"Preminger","year":"1985","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.03.030","article-title":"Percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: drainage flow and retention strength","volume":"65","author":"Canales","year":"2005","journal-title":"Urology"}],"container-title":["Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429507000076?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429507000076?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,25]],"date-time":"2025-09-25T01:45:52Z","timestamp":1758764752000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0090429507000076"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0090429507000076"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-4295"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0090-4295"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"How Small Can We Go? Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using 6F Nephroureteral Catheter","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Urology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}