{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T13:09:33Z","timestamp":1789650573272,"version":"4.0.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]],"date-time":"2016-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459468800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","goldjournal.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,29]],"date-time":"2015-12-29T12:36:34Z","timestamp":1451392594000},"page":"173-178","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Foley or Fix: A Comparative Analysis of Reparative Procedures at the Time of Explantation of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Cuff Erosion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"90","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9351-8869","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nathan","family":"Chertack","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hemant","family":"Chaparala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kenneth W.","family":"Angermeier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1515-1165","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Drogo K.","family":"Montague","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hadley M.","family":"Wood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2014.346","article-title":"Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?","volume":"12","author":"Comiter","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD008306.pub2","article-title":"Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery","author":"Silva","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12392","article-title":"Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review","volume":"21","author":"James","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.02.007","article-title":"Immediate urethral repair during explantation prevents stricture formation after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion","volume":"192","author":"Rozanski","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0030","series-title":"Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery","first-page":"161","article-title":"Stricture excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures","author":"Gomez","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0035","first-page":"79","article-title":"Con: bulbomembranous anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injuries","volume":"4","author":"Tausch","year":"2015","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2186","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(06)00307-7","article-title":"Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter","volume":"175","author":"Raj","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.07.115","article-title":"3.5\u2009cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion occurs predominantly in irradiated patients","volume":"193","author":"Simhan","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.06.044","article-title":"Is prolonged catheterization a risk factor for artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion?","volume":"82","author":"Seideman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.02.2945","article-title":"Perioperative complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement","volume":"194","author":"Linder","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12518","article-title":"Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient","volume":"113","author":"Sathianathen","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.06.088","article-title":"Artificial urinary sphincter placement in compromised urethras and survival: a comparison of virgin, radiated and reoperative cases","volume":"192","author":"McGeady","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429515011875?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429515011875?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,16]],"date-time":"2018-09-16T09:57:18Z","timestamp":1537091838000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0090429515011875"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"references-count":12,"alternative-id":["S0090429515011875"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-4295"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-4295","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Foley or Fix: A Comparative Analysis of Reparative Procedures at the Time of Explantation of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Cuff Erosion","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Urology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2015.11.040","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}