{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T09:10:30Z","timestamp":1780564230944,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774828800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","goldjournal.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T07:58:33Z","timestamp":1774857513000},"page":"3-7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Ureteroscopic Aspiration Dynamics and Stone Fragment Evacuation: In Vitro Comparison of the Second-generation CVAC System and Direct In-scope Suction"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"212","author":[{"given":"Nicolas","family":"Corsi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashley","family":"Gonzalez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5026-0359","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brett","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib1","first-page":"1161","article-title":"Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association\/Endourological Society Guideline, part II","volume":"196","author":"Assimos","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib2","first-page":"475","article-title":"EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis","volume":"69","author":"T\u00fcrk","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib3","article-title":"Factors affecting operative time during ureteroscopy and stone treatment and its effect on outcomes: retrospective results over 6.5 years","volume":"12","author":"Whitehurst","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ther\u00a0Adv\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05768-1","article-title":"Which sucks more? Comparison of two novel direct-in-scope suction ureteroscopes to a conventional ureteroscope","volume":"43","author":"Okhunov","year":"2025","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2024.1501464","article-title":"Efficacy and intrarenal pressure analysis of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths with flexible ureteroscopy in modified surgical positions for 2\u20136 cm upper urinary tract stones: a multicenter retrospective study","volume":"11","author":"Bai","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S19","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16871","article-title":"Direct in-scope suction ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions","volume":"137","author":"Patel","year":"2026","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0602","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, noninferiority study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation compared with standard ureteroscopy: 30-day results of the ASPIRE study","volume":"39","author":"Matlaga","year":"2025","journal-title":"J\u00a0Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05579-4","article-title":"Direct-in-scope suction with a 5.1Fr large working channel ureteroscope: what stone dust size for effective evacuation during laser lithotripsy? An in vitro analysis by PEARLS and section of EAU Endourology","volume":"43","author":"Chan","year":"2025","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0517","article-title":"In vitro evaluation of stone fragment evacuation by suction","volume":"35","author":"Schneider","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01771-8","article-title":"Laser lithotripsy of a brushite crystalline aggregate stone model: fragment distribution vs. BegoStone and human stones","volume":"53","author":"Glienke","year":"2025","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"}],"container-title":["Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429526002190?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0090429526002190?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T08:53:27Z","timestamp":1780563207000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0090429526002190"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"references-count":10,"alternative-id":["S0090429526002190"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-4295"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-4295","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Ureteroscopic Aspiration Dynamics and Stone Fragment Evacuation: In Vitro Comparison of the Second-generation CVAC System and Direct In-scope Suction","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Urology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2026.03.038","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}