{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T02:31:05Z","timestamp":1792809065641,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,9]],"date-time":"2021-12-09T15:36:28Z","timestamp":1639064188000},"page":"112.e11-112.e22","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7464-0332","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Keval N.","family":"Patel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abhijeet","family":"Salunke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2294-9861","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ganesh","family":"Bakshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dipin","family":"Jayaprakash","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shashank J.","family":"Pandya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.09.111","article-title":"Tumor grade improves the prognostic ability of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage in patients with penile carcinoma","volume":"185","author":"Thuret","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0002","first-page":"394","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"68","author":"Bray","year":"2018","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"2 I","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000062829.43654.5e","article-title":"Advanced penile carcinoma","volume":"170","author":"Culkin","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1007\/s11670-012-0090-2","article-title":"Lymph node metastases and prognosis in penile cancer","volume":"24","author":"Zhu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Chin J Cancer Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000154565.37397.4d","article-title":"Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases","volume":"173","author":"Kroon","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2086","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.06.016","article-title":"Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications, and late outcomes","volume":"190","author":"Koifman","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2960","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.25091","article-title":"Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5-year survival in penile cancer patients: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program","volume":"116","author":"Johnson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2020.12.010","article-title":"A proposed Clino-radio-pathological Risk Scoring System (CRiSS) for prediction and management of inguinal lymph-nodes metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis","volume":"36","author":"Patel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pathol.2019.08.003","article-title":"Histopathological risk scoring system as a tool for predicting lymph nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma","volume":"51","author":"Sali","year":"2019","journal-title":"Pathology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1159\/000474736","article-title":"Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma","volume":"22","author":"Solsona","year":"1992","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1506","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)66337-9","article-title":"Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes","volume":"165","author":"Solsona","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.03.052","article-title":"Risk stratification in penile carcinoma: 25-year experience with surgical inguinal lymph node staging","volume":"68","author":"Hungerhuber","year":"2006","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.4103\/iju.IJU_79_19","article-title":"Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer","volume":"35","author":"Ramos","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E48","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11437.x","article-title":"Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: initial experiences at a Swedish referral center","volume":"111","author":"Kirrander","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000048971.52053.8a","article-title":"Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results","volume":"169","author":"Jacobellis","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12838","article-title":"Preservation of the saphenous vein during Laparo-endoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique","volume":"115","author":"Yuan","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-55382006000300012","article-title":"Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes","volume":"32","author":"Tobias-Machado","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.05.060","article-title":"Robotic-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy","volume":"73","author":"Josephson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.02.007","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"8","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6072","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3427","article-title":"Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales","volume":"27","author":"Higgins","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","article-title":"Classification of surgical complications a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey","volume":"240","author":"Dindo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0024","unstructured":"Sch\u00fcnemann H, Bro\u017cek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. Available from https:\/\/gdt.gradepro.org\/app\/handbook\/handbook.html."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2006.10.075","article-title":"Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma","volume":"177","author":"Tobias-Machado","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13660","article-title":"A prospective study comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over 8 years","volume":"119","author":"Kumar","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0028","first-page":"4623","article-title":"Comparison of efficiency of video endoscopy and open inguinal lymph node dissection","volume":"37","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.11.007","article-title":"Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy vs open inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma penis: expanding role and comparison of outcomes","volume":"113","author":"Yadav","year":"2017","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1518","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.12.061","article-title":"Comparing outcomes of robotic and open inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with carcinoma of the penis","volume":"199","author":"Singh","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0356","article-title":"Radical videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomies: a matched pair analysis","volume":"32","author":"Ye","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-019-0571-4","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study","volume":"19","author":"Yu","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01189-x","article-title":"Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis","author":"Thyavihally","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1836","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.26454","article-title":"Log ODDS (LODDS) of positive lymph nodes as a predictor of overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis","volume":"123","author":"Patel","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2960","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.25091","article-title":"Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5 year survival in penile cancer patients","volume":"116","author":"Johnson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-019-02084-7","article-title":"More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymphnode-positive penile cancer","volume":"51","author":"Mao","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471.e19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2018.07.010","article-title":"Lymph node yield as a predictor of overall survival following inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer","volume":"36","author":"Soodana-Prakash","year":"2018","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2013.11.008","article-title":"Disease-specific survival after radical lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: prediction by lymphnode count and density","volume":"32","author":"Li","year":"2014","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e15862","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000015862","article-title":"Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"98","author":"Hu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0489","article-title":"Endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy \u2013 extended follow-up","volume":"27","author":"Schwentner","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.010","article-title":"Training high-volume melanoma surgeons to perform a novel minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy: report of a prospective multi-institutional trial","volume":"222","author":"Jakub","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.019610","article-title":"Learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia","volume":"55","author":"Choi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Can J Surg"}],"container-title":["Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1078143921005068?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1078143921005068?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T10:25:20Z","timestamp":1761042320000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1078143921005068"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1078143921005068"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["1078-1439"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1078-1439","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.11.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}