{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T09:44:58Z","timestamp":1793353498572,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["World Neurosurgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,7]],"date-time":"2018-11-07T18:27:24Z","timestamp":1541615244000},"page":"180-189","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":50,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"122","author":[{"given":"Rongqing","family":"Qin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Baoshan","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pin","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Hao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kai","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tian Li","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Feng","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoqing","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200804000-00004","article-title":"Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: trends in management","volume":"16","author":"Majid","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2257","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa070302","article-title":"Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"356","author":"Weinstein","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1051624","article-title":"A\u00a0one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)","volume":"120","author":"Harms","year":"1982","journal-title":"Z\u00a0Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of anterior-, posterior- and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease","volume":"101","author":"Lee","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"26 suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S294","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182022ddc","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes","volume":"35","author":"Karikari","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2300","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2376-y","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease","volume":"21","author":"Tsahtsarlis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-15-00756","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: traditional open versus minimally invasive techniques","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d","article-title":"Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study","volume":"38","author":"Seng","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3903-4","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"24","author":"Phan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib10","first-page":"499","article-title":"Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"49","author":"Foley","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2011.10.004","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies","volume":"19","author":"Mobbs","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-008-0687-8","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience","volume":"33","author":"Schizas","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"5 Part 1","key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib13","first-page":"566","article-title":"Spondylolisthesis; surgical fusion of lumbosacral portion of spinal column and interarticular facets; use of autogenous bone grafts for relief of disabling backache","volume":"26","author":"Meyerding","year":"1956","journal-title":"J\u00a0Int Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182055cac","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life","volume":"24","author":"Adogwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis","volume":"82","author":"Parker","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib16","first-page":"41","article-title":"Comparison between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"96","author":"Saetia","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/7236970","article-title":"Standard versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized study","volume":"2017","author":"Serban","year":"2017","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1404-z","article-title":"Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2","volume":"19","author":"Wang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.002","article-title":"Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Wu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2011.09.013","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years","volume":"78","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1159\/000051263","article-title":"Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer\u2019s disease drug trials","volume":"12","author":"Oremus","year":"2001","journal-title":"Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1741","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2747-z","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence","volume":"22","author":"Tian","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1554809","article-title":"Comparison between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of clinical results and safety outcomes","volume":"77","author":"Lin","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib24","first-page":"3868","article-title":"Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"124","author":"Wang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2078","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.12.016","article-title":"Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center","volume":"14","author":"Wang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases","volume":"35","author":"Shunwu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000165","article-title":"Computer-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion may be better than open surgery for treating degenerative lumbar disease","volume":"30","author":"Tian","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.053","article-title":"A\u00a0perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"14","author":"Singh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2732-6","article-title":"Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis","volume":"22","author":"Archavlis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"suppl 2","key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib30","first-page":"203","article-title":"Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery","volume":"60","author":"Scheufler","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1548","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318252d44b","article-title":"Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases","volume":"37","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.117","article-title":"Evidence-based review of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is minimally invasive better?","volume":"82","author":"Kaloostian","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.09.009","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in multilevel: comparison with conventional transforaminal interbody fusion","volume":"85","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2273","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181cd42cc","article-title":"Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates","volume":"35","author":"Wu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2857","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2853-y","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up","volume":"22","author":"Rodr\u00edguez-Vela","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E559","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000034","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis grade I: minimally invasive versus open surgery","volume":"28","author":"Brodano","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2013.12.007","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort","volume":"25","author":"Wong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-013-2169-x","article-title":"Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease","volume":"38","author":"Gu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1727","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3465-5","article-title":"Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review","volume":"472","author":"Goldstein","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000000913","article-title":"Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"77","author":"Khan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"}],"container-title":["World Neurosurgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1878875018325099?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1878875018325099?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T08:18:24Z","timestamp":1761812304000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1878875018325099"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":40,"alternative-id":["S1878875018325099"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202","relation":{},"ISSN":["1878-8750"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1878-8750","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"World Neurosurgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.202","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}