{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T19:01:41Z","timestamp":1788462101318,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]],"date-time":"2024-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714521600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]],"date-time":"2024-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714521600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,16]],"date-time":"2024-02-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1708041600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["World Neurosurgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]],"date-time":"2024-02-19T07:26:43Z","timestamp":1708327603000},"page":"150-164","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Assessing Surgical Outcomes for Cage Plate System versus Stand-Alone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"185","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0339-3666","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elias","family":"Elias","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Daoud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Justin","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3111-6749","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charbel","family":"Elias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5614-7103","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zeina","family":"Nasser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib1","first-page":"72","article-title":"Anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"1","author":"Maharaj","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001680","article-title":"Relationship between ASA scores and 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"42","author":"Phan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1538","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002140","article-title":"Predictors for patient discharge destination after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"42","author":"Di Capua","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1080\/02688697.2017.1394980","article-title":"Influence of plate fixation on cervical height and alignment after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"32","author":"Yu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-022-00813-w","article-title":"Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"27","author":"Zhang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.04.019","article-title":"Comparison of zero-profile device versus plate-and-cage implant in the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a minimum 2-year follow-up study","volume":"115","author":"Shen","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/6597754","article-title":"Revision surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disc degeneration after initial anterior cervical fusion: is ROI-C better than plate-cage construct?","volume":"2021","author":"Niu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib8","article-title":"Comparison of the clinical effects of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage-plate construct for the treatment of noncontiguous bilevel of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): a minimum 2-year follow-up","volume":"97","author":"Lu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2018.04.033","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes","volume":"170","author":"Zhou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2020.06.014","article-title":"Could self-locking stand-alone cage reduce adjacent-level ossification development after aneterior cervical discectomy and fusion?","volume":"78","author":"Zhou","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001776","article-title":"Analysis of associating factors with C2-7 sagittal vertical Axis after two-level anterior cervical fusion: comparison between plate augmentation and stand-alone cages","volume":"42","author":"Kwon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1583","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci12111583","article-title":"Is the zero-P spacer suitable for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery in terms of sagittal alignment reconstruction: a comparison study with traditional plate and cage system","volume":"12","author":"Guo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Brain Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.736680","article-title":"Comparative analysis of cage subsidence in anterior cervical decompression and fusion: zero profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional cage and plate construct","volume":"8","author":"Jin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.105906","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"88","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?","volume":"17","author":"Jadad","year":"1996","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","article-title":"Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses","volume":"25","author":"Stang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2005.02.018","article-title":"A\u00a0preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease","volume":"13","author":"Song","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2020.105685","article-title":"Comparison of stand-alone cage and cage-with-plate for monosegmental cervical fusion and impact of virtual reality in evaluating surgical results","volume":"191","author":"Zawy Alsofy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.01.013","article-title":"The fate of adjacent segments after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the influence of an anterior plate system","volume":"89","author":"Ahn","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.14444\/8060","article-title":"Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes after standalone versus cage and plate constructs for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"15","author":"Fayed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2016.03.010","article-title":"Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: a three-year follow-up","volume":"144","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.02.032","article-title":"Multilevel anterior cervical fusion with standalone cage or cage-and-plate after cervical discectomy: benefits and drawbacks","volume":"46","author":"Eghbal","year":"2023","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1201","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000341","article-title":"Comparison of surgical outcomes, narcotics utilization, and costs after an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage versus anterior plating","volume":"30","author":"Tabaraee","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2016.13.1.13","article-title":"Stand-alone cages for anterior cervical fusion: are there No problems?","volume":"13","author":"Han","year":"2016","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.931050","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer-ROI-C-fixation and combined intervertebral cage and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective study from a single center","volume":"27","author":"He","year":"2021","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E433","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182a355ad","article-title":"Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plates in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: analysis of adjacent segment degeneration","volume":"28","author":"Ji","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib28","article-title":"Clinical outcomes between stand-alone zero-profile spacers and cervical plate with cage fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 166 patients","volume":"10","author":"Sommaruga","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000032","article-title":"The efficiency of zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: a prospective controlled long-term follow-up study","volume":"28","author":"Li","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4500-x","article-title":"Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"25","author":"Liu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2142214.107","article-title":"Effects of anterior plating on achieving clinically meaningful improvement following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"19","author":"Lynch","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1033","DOI":"10.53350\/pjmhs221651033","article-title":"Comparison of radiological outcome in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: cage-only v\/s cage and plate fixation","volume":"16","author":"Mari","year":"2022","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1547-4","article-title":"Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up","volume":"25","author":"Nemoto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-018-1950-9","article-title":"Comparison among perfect-C(R), zero-P(R), and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease","volume":"19","author":"Noh","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31824c7d22","article-title":"Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plate in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: clinical outcomes and radiologic changes","volume":"26","author":"Oh","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2814","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06454-z","article-title":"Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study","volume":"29","author":"Scholz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1973","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.04.024","article-title":"Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study","volume":"15","author":"Shi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E792","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182913400","article-title":"Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with Zero-P spacer: prospective comparative study-clinical and radiological results at a minimum 2 years after surgery","volume":"38","author":"Vanek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3628-9","article-title":"The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"24","author":"Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1097\/BTO.0b013e3182908ff0","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-profile implant system for cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"29","author":"Yan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Tech Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-015-2212-z","article-title":"Zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage system","volume":"135","author":"Yang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2014.56.2.103","article-title":"Comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes of a zero-profile device concerning reduced postoperative Dysphagia after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"56","author":"Son","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.09.065","article-title":"Use of a zero-profile device for contiguous 2-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: comparison with cage with plate construct","volume":"97","author":"Yun","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001332","article-title":"Stand-alone cage versus anterior plating for 1-level and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"Zavras","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.12.060","article-title":"A\u00a0clinical comparison of anterior cervical plates versus stand-alone intervertebral fusion devices for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures","volume":"99","author":"Panchal","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib46","first-page":"7077","article-title":"Application of Zero-P on anterior cervical decompression and bone fusion","volume":"10","author":"Xiao","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004465","article-title":"Comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes between the self-locking stand-alone cage and conventional cage-plate construct: a five-year retrospective cohort study","volume":"48","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib48","first-page":"1","article-title":"Comparison between zero-profile and cage plate devices in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylopathy","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4391-x","volume":"25","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E284","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828873ed","article-title":"Zero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior plating","volume":"28","author":"Hofstetter","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E193","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31827a2812","article-title":"Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"26","author":"Miao","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B4.30992","article-title":"The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: a preliminary clinical investigation","volume":"95-B","author":"Qi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Bone Joint Lett J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E259","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002323","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between zero-profile and traditional multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for cervical myelopathy","volume":"43","author":"He","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001129","article-title":"Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-and-cage after 1-level ACDF with complete uncinate process resection: a 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes","volume":"34","author":"Noh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2013.05.019","article-title":"The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"21","author":"Wang","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-020-00729-4","article-title":"Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study","volume":"20","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib57","first-page":"13854","article-title":"Clinical comparison of Zero-profile interbody fusion device and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion in treating cervical spondylosis","volume":"8","author":"Yan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.3233\/BMR-169708","article-title":"Comparison between zero-profile spacer and plate with cage in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis","volume":"31","author":"Lan","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Back Musculoskelet Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.18203\/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20203540","article-title":"Comparative study of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by anterior cervical plate and stand-alone cervical cage","volume":"6","author":"Abdul Aziz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Res Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2310","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318154c57e","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications","volume":"32","author":"Fountas","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2006.09.032","article-title":"Esophageal perforation from anterior cervical screw migration","volume":"68","author":"Sahjpaul","year":"2007","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-004-0849-3","article-title":"Persistent swallowing and voice problems after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year follow-up study","volume":"14","author":"Yue","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0339-5","article-title":"Anatomic mapping and evaluation of the esophagus in relation to the cervical vertebral body","volume":"16","author":"Rhyne","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2453","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211150-00007","article-title":"Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study","volume":"27","author":"Bazaz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000177211.44960.71","article-title":"Influence of anterior cervical plate design on Dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study","volume":"18","author":"Lee","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318274148e","article-title":"Comparative analysis of 3 different construct systems for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage, iliac graft plus plate augmentation, and cage plus plating","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.06.022","article-title":"Surgical treatment of dysphagia after anterior cervical interbody fusion","volume":"5","author":"Fogel","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-022-02940-w","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes between Zero-p implant and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion systems for anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"17","author":"Zhang","year":"2022","journal-title":"J\u00a0Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.128","article-title":"Zero-Profile versus cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2 Years of follow-up: a meta-analysis","volume":"120","author":"Sun","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200503000-00012","article-title":"Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate","volume":"87","author":"Park","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31825bd26d","article-title":"Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review","volume":"27","author":"Karikari","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4791-y","article-title":"Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Lu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218774576","article-title":"Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a stand-alone interbody cage versus a conventional cage-plate technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"9","author":"Cheung","year":"2019","journal-title":"Global Spine J"}],"container-title":["World Neurosurgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S187887502400281X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S187887502400281X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]],"date-time":"2025-06-12T00:57:56Z","timestamp":1749689876000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S187887502400281X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]},"references-count":73,"alternative-id":["S187887502400281X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079","relation":{},"ISSN":["1878-8750"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1878-8750","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Assessing Surgical Outcomes for Cage Plate System versus Stand-Alone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"World Neurosurgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}