{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T13:00:45Z","timestamp":1789477245044,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,1]],"date-time":"2011-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1298937600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Women and Birth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,6]],"date-time":"2010-05-06T10:01:09Z","timestamp":1273140069000},"page":"3-9","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["A new perspective on VBAC: A retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Genia","family":"Rozen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antony M.","family":"Ugoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Penny M.","family":"Sheehan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1819","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68704-7","article-title":"For the WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group: caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 who global survey on maternal and perinatal health in latin America","volume":"367","author":"Villar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5","article-title":"Group. WHOGSoMaPHR: method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the who global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007\u201308","volume":"375","author":"Lumbiganon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib3","first-page":"316","article-title":"A new way of looking at caesarean section births","volume":"47","author":"McCarthy","year":"2007","journal-title":"ANZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib4","series-title":"Australia's mothers and babies 1999","author":"Nassar","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib5","series-title":"Pregnancy outcome in south Australia 2000","author":"Chan","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000116259.41678.f1","article-title":"Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review","volume":"103","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.060870","article-title":"Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term","volume":"176","author":"Liu","year":"2007","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.040","article-title":"Clinical outcomes in VBAC attempts: what to say to patients?","volume":"199","author":"Macones","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.03.008","article-title":"Preferred and actual delivery mode after a cesarean in London, UK","volume":"102","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2008.07.004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"35","author":"Landon","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib12","article-title":"Birth after caesarean study \u2013 planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial","volume":"7","author":"Dodd","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2004.00257.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean for women with a single prior caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"44","author":"Dodd","year":"2004","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2004.0274.x","article-title":"Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence","volume":"31","author":"Eden","year":"2004","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"National institute of child health and human development. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00623.x","article-title":"The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review","volume":"112","author":"McDonagh","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.19","article-title":"Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"329","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"National institute of child health and human development. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903067394","article-title":"Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour","volume":"23","author":"Ogbonmwan","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126977","article-title":"Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after caesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery","volume":"187","author":"Richter","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a66d57","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery","volume":"113","author":"Kamath","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2007.11.020","article-title":"Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: a developmental study","volume":"71","author":"Farnworth","year":"2008","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib24","series-title":"National institutes of health consensus development conference statement; nih consensus development conference: vaginal birth after cesarean","author":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of cesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Maternal Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","article-title":"Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?","volume":"15","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1494","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.x","article-title":"Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians","volume":"115","author":"Turner","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a caesarean","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00398-1","article-title":"Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions","volume":"94","author":"Shipp","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-200204000-00011","article-title":"Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case\u2013control study","volume":"95","author":"Diaz","year":"2002","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00446-3","article-title":"Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss working group of obstetric and gynecologic institutions","volume":"93","author":"Rageth","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114852","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital","volume":"184","author":"Blanchette","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["Women and Birth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519210000247?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519210000247?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,11]],"date-time":"2018-12-11T10:00:44Z","timestamp":1544522444000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1871519210000247"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1871519210000247"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2010.04.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1871-5192"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1871-5192","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]}}}