{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T13:22:28Z","timestamp":1761744148564,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Australian Postgraduate Award"},{"name":"Frank Claire Scholarship"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["womenandbirth.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Women and Birth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,13]],"date-time":"2015-06-13T01:58:57Z","timestamp":1434160737000},"page":"303-309","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Maternity Care Plans: A retrospective review of a process aiming to support women who decline standard care"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6723-8898","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bec","family":"Jenkinson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sue","family":"Kruske","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Helen","family":"Stapleton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Beckmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maree","family":"Reynolds","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sue","family":"Kildea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"year":"1993","series-title":"Changing childbirth. Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group","author":"Department of Health","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0260"},{"year":"2009","series-title":"Improving Maternity Services in Australia: the report of the Maternity Services Review","author":"Department of Health and Ageing","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0265"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1017\/S0008197306007161","article-title":"Do no harm \u2013 do patients have responsibilities too?","volume":"65","author":"Brazier","year":"2006","journal-title":"Camb Law J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2011.0576","article-title":"Authoritarian physicians and patients\u2019 fear of being labeled \u2018difficult\u2019 among key obstacles to shared decision making","volume":"31","author":"Frosch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-84","article-title":"Maternity care providers\u2019 perceptions of women's autonomy and the law","volume":"13","author":"Kruske","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732311424292","article-title":"Canadian care providers\u2019 and pregnant women's approaches to managing birth: minimizing risk while maximizing integrity","volume":"22","author":"Hall","year":"2012","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.52","article-title":"The ethics of vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"42","author":"Charles","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802668698","article-title":"Refusal of treatment in obstetrics: a maternal\u2013fetal conflict","volume":"22","author":"Iris","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.04.008","article-title":"Refusal of emergency caesarean delivery in cases of non-reassuring fetal heart rate is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality","volume":"158","author":"Ribak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820806002317","article-title":"Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue","volume":"19","author":"Savulescu","year":"2007","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1093\/ojls\/20.3.407","article-title":"The pregnant woman and the good Samaritan: can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section?","volume":"20","author":"Scott","year":"2000","journal-title":"Oxf J Leg Stud"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1220","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000148159.89833.db","article-title":"Should refusal to undergo a Cesarean delivery be a criminal offense?","volume":"104","author":"Berkowitz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2001.01700.x","article-title":"The parturient woman: can there be room for more than one person with full and equal rights inside a single human skin?","volume":"33","author":"Burrows","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"year":"2008","series-title":"National midwifery guidelines for consultation and referral","author":"Australian College of Midwives","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0325"},{"year":"2006","series-title":"The RANZCOG Code of Ethical Practice","author":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG)","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0330"},{"year":"2013","series-title":"Maternal decision making","author":"Australian Medical Association (AMA)","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0335"},{"year":"2012","series-title":"Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynaecology","author":"FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0340"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1258\/ce.2010.010028","article-title":"Why I wrote\u2026 Rights, duties and the body: law and ethics of the maternal\u2013fetal conflict","volume":"5","author":"Scott","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000239123.10646.4c","article-title":"Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: a study of obstetricians\u2019 attitudes in Europe","volume":"108","author":"Cuttini","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.5172\/hesr.2006.15.5.421","article-title":"Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance","volume":"15","author":"Willis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Sociol Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0360","first-page":"751","article-title":"Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case\u2013control study","volume":"101","author":"Ransom","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1136\/jmh.2004.000195","article-title":"False dichotomies: EBM, clinical freedom and the art of medicine","volume":"31","author":"Parker","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Humanit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2013-101847","article-title":"\u2018She can\u2019t come here!\u2019 Ethics and the case of birth centre admission policy in the UK","author":"Scamell","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2012-001502","article-title":"How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study","volume":"22","author":"van der Weijden","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"year":"2014","series-title":"WHO statement: the prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth","author":"World Health Organisation (WHO)","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0380"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2010.00440.x","article-title":"Attitudes of midwives in Sweden toward a woman's refusal of an emergency cesarean section or a cesarean section on request","volume":"38","author":"Danerek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.01.012","article-title":"Obstetricians\u2019 opinions and attitudes toward maternal refusal of recommended cesarean delivery in Nigeria","volume":"105","author":"Chigbu","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2006.12.001","article-title":"Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections","volume":"17","author":"Samuels","year":"2007","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0400","article-title":"Trust, power and agency in childbirth: women's relationships with obstetricians","volume":"22","author":"Campo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Outskirts"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70137-0","article-title":"Resolving the clinical and ethical dilemma involved in fetal\u2013maternal conflicts","volume":"175","author":"Pinkerton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90374-G","article-title":"Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians","volume":"162","author":"Chervenak","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0415","first-page":"e144","article-title":"Management of pregnant patients who refuse medically indicated cesarean delivery","volume":"5","author":"Deshpande","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0420","series-title":"Non-standard maternity care \u2013 consultation, informed choice and documentation. Policy No. MHS-WCH-W-OG-343","first-page":"3","author":"Mater Health Services","year":"2010"},{"year":"2014","series-title":"MHS annual review","author":"Mater Health Services","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0425"},{"year":"2009","series-title":"Mater Mothers\u2019 Hospitals Annual Clinical Report 2009 incorporating selected clinical outcomes for 2008","author":"Mater Health Services","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0430"},{"year":"2006","series-title":"Categorisation of urgency for caesarean section","author":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG)","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0435"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8","article-title":"Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences","volume":"112","author":"Little","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"w555","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.28.4.w555","article-title":"What \u2018patient-centered\u2019 should mean: confessions of an extremist","volume":"28","author":"Berwick","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-62","article-title":"Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures?","volume":"14","author":"Thompson","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00165.x","article-title":"In the literature: combating coercion: breech birth, parturient choice, and the evolution of evidence-based maternity care","volume":"34","author":"Kotaska","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0460","series-title":"Vaginal birth after Caesarean Section Policy No. MHS-WCH-W-069","first-page":"10","author":"Mater Health Services","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0465","series-title":"Vaginal Breech Birth Policy No. MHS-WCH-W-OG-151","first-page":"11","author":"Mater Health Services","year":"2012"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1525\/maq.1996.10.2.02a00030","article-title":"The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care","volume":"10","author":"Browner","year":"1996","journal-title":"Med Anthropol Q"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2004.02.010","article-title":"Quality care and practice variation: the roles of practice guidelines and public profiles","volume":"49","author":"Margo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1097\/NMC.0b013e31829a399d","article-title":"Birth plans: tickets to the OR?","volume":"38","author":"White-Corey","year":"2013","journal-title":"MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2006.00042.x","article-title":"Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future","volume":"35","author":"Lothian","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2296-13-108","article-title":"Cultures of risk and their influence on birth in rural British Columbia","volume":"13","author":"Kornelsen","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Fam Pract"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2010.05.009","article-title":"Niyith Nniyith Watmam (the quiet story): exploring the experiences of Aboriginal women who give birth in their remote community","volume":"27","author":"Ireland","year":"2011","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wsif.2008.05.010","article-title":"Explaining obstetric interventionism: technical skills, common conceptualisations, or collective countertransference?","volume":"31","author":"Cherniak","year":"2008","journal-title":"Womens Stud Int Forum"},{"year":"2011","series-title":"National Maternity Services Plan","author":"AHMAC","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0505"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.07.019","article-title":"Notes on a stick: use and acceptability of woman-held maternity notes","volume":"153","author":"W\u00e4ckerle","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0511","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/13698575.2013.876191","article-title":"Pregnancy, birth and risk: an introduction","volume":"16","author":"Katz Rothman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Health Risk Soc"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0512","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2013.11.003","article-title":"Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care","volume":"27","author":"Ebert","year":"2014","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003_bib0513","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0151","article-title":"Counselling women about choice","volume":"15","author":"Harris","year":"2001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["Women and Birth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519215000554?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519215000554?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,21]],"date-time":"2018-09-21T17:50:38Z","timestamp":1537552238000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1871519215000554"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1871519215000554"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1871-5192"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1871-5192"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Maternity Care Plans: A retrospective review of a process aiming to support women who decline standard care","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Women and Birth","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.05.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}