{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T15:26:07Z","timestamp":1790436367977,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]],"date-time":"2021-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626825600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Women and Birth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,10]],"date-time":"2021-07-10T02:46:14Z","timestamp":1625885174000},"page":"e233-e242","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Breech presentation management: A critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2714-1538","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sara","family":"Morris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6920-6013","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sadie","family":"Geraghty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deborah","family":"Sundin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2018.26.7.440","article-title":"Moxibustion: an alternative option for breech presentation","volume":"26","author":"Morris","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br. J. Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0010","first-page":"5","article-title":"Singleton breech presentation at term: review of the evidence and international guidelines for application to the New Zealand context","volume":"54","author":"Dixon","year":"2018","journal-title":"N. Z. Coll. Midwives J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.07.015","article-title":"Midwives\u2019 experiences and feelings of confidence surrounding vaginal breech birth: a qualitative study","volume":"41","author":"Sloman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2011.00507.x","article-title":"The term breech trial ten years on: primum non nocere?","volume":"39","author":"Lawson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.01.007","article-title":"Standards for maternity care professionals attending planned upright breech births: a Delphi study","volume":"34","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2020.28.4.210","article-title":"Why breech birth matters","volume":"28","author":"Spillane","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br. J. Midwifery"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3002","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1362382","article-title":"A novel and dedicated multidisciplinary service to manage breech presentation at term; 3 years of experience in a tertiary care maternity unit","volume":"31","author":"Hickland","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e23514","DOI":"10.2196\/23514","article-title":"Development of a breech-specific integrated care pathway for pregnant women: protocol for a mixed methods study","volume":"10","author":"Morris","year":"2021","journal-title":"JMIR Res. Protoc."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2009.00372.x","article-title":"Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after caesarean section","volume":"37","author":"Foureur","year":"2010","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzaa129","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical practice guideline quality: comparison of two appraisal tools","volume":"32","author":"Koc","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Qual. Health Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-63","article-title":"Efficient clinical evaluation of guideline quality: development and testing of a new tool","volume":"14","author":"Grimmer","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med. Res. Methodol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0065","first-page":"e151","article-title":"Management of breech presentation: green-top guideline no. 20b","volume":"124","author":"Impey","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.03.033","article-title":"Breech presentation: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"252","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.12.018","article-title":"No. 384-management of breech presentation at term","volume":"41","author":"Kotaska","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0080","series-title":"Management of Breech Presentation at Term","author":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG)","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0085","series-title":"National Clinical Guideline: the Management of Breech Presentation","author":"Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (IOG)","year":"2017"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e60","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002755","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 745: mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"132","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0100","article-title":"Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12011","article-title":"Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review","volume":"92","author":"Rosman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00822-6","article-title":"Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial","volume":"189","author":"Su","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00949.x","article-title":"Hyperextension of the fetal head in breech presentation. A study with long-term follow-up","volume":"88","author":"Westgren","year":"1981","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10850.x","article-title":"The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse","volume":"102","author":"Murphy","year":"1995","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0048","article-title":"Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance","volume":"43","author":"Bogner","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Perinat. Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0130","article-title":"Women\u2019s position during second stage of labour","author":"Gupta","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0135","first-page":"17","article-title":"Understanding physiological breech birth","volume":"3","author":"Evans","year":"2012","journal-title":"Essent. MIDIRS"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12288","article-title":"Perspectives on risk: assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States","volume":"44","author":"Bovbjerg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2011.00468.x","article-title":"Commentary: routine cesarean section for breech: the unmeasured cost","volume":"38","author":"Kotaska","year":"2011","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2018.26.3.145","article-title":"Are midwifery students adequately prepared for vaginal breech birth in clinical practice?","volume":"26","author":"Nel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br. J. Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2015.09.004","article-title":"Barriers and facilitators for vaginal breech births in Australia: clinician\u2019s experiences","volume":"29","author":"Catling","year":"2016","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0160","series-title":"Introduction to Research for Midwives","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0165","series-title":"Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice","author":"Schneider","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0170","first-page":"16","article-title":"A healthy baby isn\u2019t all that matters","volume":"87","author":"Fiscer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Midwifery Today"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12524","article-title":"Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies","volume":"56","author":"Dietz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2019.08.006","article-title":"What if something goes wrong? A grounded theory study of parents\u2019 decision-making processes around mode of breech birth at term gestation","volume":"78","author":"Thompson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2017.09.012","article-title":"The influence of counselling on the mode of breech birth: a single-center observational prospective study in The Netherlands","volume":"55","author":"Abdessalami","year":"2017","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2008.04.011","article-title":"Does counsellor\u2019s attitude influence change in a request for a caesarean in women with fear of birth?","volume":"26","author":"Halvorsen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3116","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.14832","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of breech birth and disciplinary power","volume":"77","author":"Morris","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Adv. Nurs."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12010","article-title":"Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Cook","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0205","article-title":"Breech Birth Options","author":"Spillane","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0210","series-title":"Breech \u2014 Management of","author":"The Royal Women\u2019s Hospital","year":"2020"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2147","DOI":"10.1177\/0969733018819119","article-title":"Beyond autonomy: care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth","volume":"26","author":"Newnham","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nurs. Ethics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.11.005","article-title":"\u2018Stress, anger, fear and injustice\u2019: an international survey of women\u2019s experiences planning a vaginal breech birth","volume":"44","author":"Petrovska","year":"2017","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0225","series-title":"Ethics and Law for the Health Professions","year":"2013"},{"issue":"1418","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0230","first-page":"85","article-title":"Informed consent to breech birth in New Zealand","volume":"128","author":"Powell","year":"2015","journal-title":"N. Z. Med. J."},{"issue":"68","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0235","first-page":"12","article-title":"Breech presentation at term: beyond the dominant strategies","volume":"106","author":"Odent","year":"2013","journal-title":"Midwifery Today"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0240","first-page":"1","article-title":"Breech birth: an unusual normal","volume":"15","author":"Walker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Pract. Midwife"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12326","article-title":"Expertise in physiological breech birth: a mixed methods study","volume":"45","author":"Walker","year":"2018","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2015.01.004","article-title":"Standards for midwife practincioners of external cephalic version: a Delphi study","volume":"31","author":"Walker","year":"2015","journal-title":"Midwifery"}],"container-title":["Women and Birth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519221001141?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519221001141?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T09:39:35Z","timestamp":1761730775000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1871519221001141"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1871519221001141"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["1871-5192"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1871-5192","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Breech presentation management: A critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Women and Birth","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}