{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T02:23:12Z","timestamp":1789438992453,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769558400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":211,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Women and Birth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,4]],"date-time":"2025-06-04T08:28:51Z","timestamp":1749025731000},"page":"101935","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Evaluating the impact of the induction of labour improvement initiative on clinical outcomes, women\u2019s care satisfaction, and clinician experiences"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2772-811X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vidanka","family":"Vasilevski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hayley","family":"Pohatu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara","family":"Holton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4620-7691","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karen","family":"Wynter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0605-1186","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Linda","family":"Sweet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib1","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib2","unstructured":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia\u2019s mothers and babies 2019. Canberra: AIHW; 2022. Contract No.: Perinatal statistics series no. 35. Cat. no. PER 100."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib3","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.17587.1","article-title":"Recent advances in the induction of labor","volume":"8","author":"Marconi","year":"2019","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005217","article-title":"Effects of the ARRIVE (A randomized trial of induction versus expectant management) trial on elective induction and obstetric outcomes in term nulliparous patients","volume":"142","author":"Nethery","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004259","article-title":"Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: a national cohort study in England","volume":"20","author":"Muller","year":"2023","journal-title":"PLOS Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12930","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: an observational study","volume":"59","author":"De Vries","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-047040","article-title":"Intrapartum interventions and outcomes for women and children following induction of labour at term in uncomplicated pregnancies: a 16-year population-based linked data study","volume":"11","author":"Dahlen","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004945.pub4","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.11124\/JBISRIR-2017-003587","article-title":"Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Rydahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement Rep."},{"issue":"may10 3","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjquality.u203804.w4027","article-title":"Improving induction of labour - a quality improvement project addressing Caesarean section rates and length of process in women undergoing induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"O'Dwyer","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Qual. Improv. Rep."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.635","article-title":"Economic implications of method of delivery","volume":"193","author":"Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":".e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","article-title":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"220","author":"Hersh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib16","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"de Vaan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"10364","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1681","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01845-1","article-title":"Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"400","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0284818","article-title":"Clinicians\u2019 perspectives and experiences of providing cervical ripening at home or in-hospital in the United Kingdom","volume":"18","author":"Yuill","year":"2023","journal-title":"PLOS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-071703","article-title":"Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units","volume":"13","author":"Harkness","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013","article-title":"Women's experiences of induction of labour: qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis","volume":"69","author":"Coates","year":"2019","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib21","article-title":"Induction of labour: experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians","author":"Coates","year":"2019","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12211","article-title":"Women's experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study","author":"Henderson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Et. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2018.26.1.22","article-title":"Induction of labour: How do women get information and make decisions? Findings of a qualitative study","volume":"26","author":"Jay","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br. J. Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.02.002","article-title":"Women\u05f3s perceptions of induction of labour outcomes: results of an online-survey in Germany","volume":"35","author":"Schwarz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-024-06936-8","article-title":"Women and birth partners\u2019 experiences of cervical ripening at home and in hospital","volume":"25","author":"Yuill","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2023.100928","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of consent to induction of labour: a qualitative study","volume":"39","author":"Kelly","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sex. Reprod. Healthc."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008755","article-title":"Variation in hospital rates of induction of labour: a population-based record linkage study","volume":"5","author":"Nippita","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1518-y","article-title":"Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study","volume":"17","author":"Nippita","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2013.11.010","article-title":"Forty years of unwarranted variation--and still counting","volume":"114","author":"Wennberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib30","first-page":"797","article-title":"Labor induction process improvement","volume":"113","author":"Fisch","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diabres.2023.110793","article-title":"Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity and associated perinatal outcomes over 10 years in an Australian tertiary maternity provider","volume":"203","author":"Deitch","year":"2023","journal-title":"Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib32","series-title":"Induction of Labour","author":"Safer Care Victoria","year":"2023"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x","article-title":"The qualitative content analysis process","volume":"62","author":"Elo","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Adv. Nurs."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib34","unstructured":"V. Braun, V. ClarkeThematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications; 2022."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05665-8","article-title":"Women\u2019s subjective perceptions and background factors associated with poor maternal childbirth experience among induced and spontaneous onset of labour: a two-year tertiary hospital cohort study","volume":"23","author":"Place","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0297857","article-title":"Induction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units","volume":"19","author":"Taylor","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLOS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e406","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2020.07.006","article-title":"Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with double balloon catheter or prostaglandin pessary: a qualitative study","volume":"34","author":"Coates","year":"2021","journal-title":"Women Birth"}],"container-title":["Women and Birth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519225000691?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1871519225000691?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T08:24:42Z","timestamp":1769588682000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1871519225000691"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1871519225000691"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935","relation":{},"ISSN":["1871-5192"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1871-5192","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Evaluating the impact of the induction of labour improvement initiative on clinical outcomes, women\u2019s care satisfaction, and clinician experiences","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Women and Birth","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wombi.2025.101935","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101935"}}