{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T17:50:23Z","timestamp":1789753823643,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614556800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614556800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,9]],"date-time":"2020-11-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1604880000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["fertstertreports.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["F&S Reports"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,11]],"date-time":"2020-11-11T18:09:59Z","timestamp":1605118199000},"page":"50-57","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Elective transfer of one embryo is associated with a higher cumulative live birth rate and improved perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of two embryos with in\u00a0vitro fertilization"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Rachel B.","family":"Mejia","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily A.","family":"Capper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen M.","family":"Summers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5041-0708","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Patrick","family":"Ten Eyck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bradley J.","family":"Van Voorhis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2018. National Vital Statistics Reports","volume":"68","author":"Martin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.05.035","article-title":"The desire of infertile patients for multiple births","volume":"81","author":"Ryan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms016","article-title":"A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos","volume":"18","author":"Edgar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.05.006","article-title":"The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting","volume":"25","year":"2012","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","article-title":"Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Roque","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib6","first-page":"2703","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?","volume":"30","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c6945","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c6945","article-title":"Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials","volume":"341","author":"McLernon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.05.026","article-title":"Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update","volume":"106","author":"Toner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.017","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics","volume":"106","author":"Mancuso","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib10","series-title":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2012 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.09.023","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice","volume":"92","author":"Stillman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn045","article-title":"The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Vitthala","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.12.127","article-title":"Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention","volume":"103","author":"Kissin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial","volume":"112","author":"Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.107","article-title":"Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion","volume":"107","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.005","article-title":"Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States","volume":"209","author":"Lemos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib18","first-page":"1","article-title":"Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model","author":"Whittier Olerich","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Reprod Infant Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001","article-title":"A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates","volume":"88","author":"Ryan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["F&S Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2666334120300982?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2666334120300982?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T21:04:08Z","timestamp":1762981448000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2666334120300982"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2666334120300982"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["2666-3341"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2666-3341","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Elective transfer of one embryo is associated with a higher cumulative live birth rate and improved perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of two embryos with in\u00a0vitro fertilization","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"F&S Reports","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.10.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Reproductive Medicine.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}