{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,14]],"date-time":"2026-03-14T03:13:25Z","timestamp":1773458005843,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669852800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669852800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,2]],"date-time":"2022-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662076800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["nassopenaccess.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,9]],"date-time":"2022-09-09T04:39:15Z","timestamp":1662698355000},"page":"100168","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"special_numbering":"C","title":["A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Silicon Nitride and Biomaterial Modulus as it Relates to Subsidence Risk in Spinal Fusion Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3252-8769","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jared D.","family":"Ament","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amir","family":"Vokshoor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Randy","family":"Yee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. Patrick","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S318589","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of peptide enhanced bone graft i-factor versus use of local autologous bone in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery","volume":"13","author":"Thaci","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clinicoecon Outcomes Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2017.05.01","article-title":"Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants","volume":"3","author":"Heary","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.011","article-title":"Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model","volume":"22","author":"Loenen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0004","unstructured":"Literature query comparing titanium and PEEK interbody fusions. https:\/\/www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.mlprox.csmc.edu\/pmc\/?term=Titanium+vs.+polyetheretherketone+(PEEK)+interbody+fusion. Accessed May 10, 2022."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-21-115","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a silicon nitride cage demonstrates early radiographic fusion","volume":"8","author":"Gray","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E10","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.3.FOCUS201044","article-title":"Enhanced biomaterials: systematic review of alternatives to supplement spine fusion including silicon nitride, bioactive glass, amino peptide bone graft, and tantalum","volume":"50","author":"Fiani","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.12.11","article-title":"Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials","volume":"6","author":"Calvert","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0008","article-title":"The SNAP trial: 2-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in patients after lumbar fusion surgery","author":"Kersten","year":"2021","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-20-588","article-title":"Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders","volume":"6","author":"McEntire","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"March","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x","article-title":"Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument","volume":"73","author":"Slim","year":"2003","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0012","unstructured":"Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2013, http:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford.asp"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2372","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5079-6","article-title":"Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial","volume":"26","author":"Arts","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2772-y","article-title":"Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up","volume":"22","author":"Chen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2007.05.016","article-title":"Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts","volume":"15","author":"Chou","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527","volume":"19","author":"Davis","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/s10856-016-5712-7","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of two authors of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: N-HA\/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages","volume":"27","author":"Deng","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Mater Sci Mater Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0018","article-title":"Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing titanium and PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) cages","volume":"34","author":"Junaid","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pakistan J Med Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-20-588","article-title":"Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders","volume":"6","author":"McEntire","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2150","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3466-9","article-title":"Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation","volume":"23","author":"Nemoto","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0021","first-page":"310","article-title":"Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages","volume":"23","author":"Niu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"December","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.09.027","article-title":"Application of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages in the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis","volume":"127","author":"Schomacher","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1604284","article-title":"Fusion rates of intervertebral polyetheretherketone and titanium cages without bone grafting in posterior interbody lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar instability","volume":"78","author":"Wrangel","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Part A"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/s10856-016-5712-7","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of two authors of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: N-HA\/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages","volume":"27","author":"Deng","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Mater Sci Mater Med"},{"issue":"January","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2018.11.015","article-title":"A comparison of long-term outcomes of nanohydroxyapatite\/polyamide-66 cage and titanium mesh cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a clinical follow-up study of least 8 years","volume":"176","author":"Hu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"issue":"March","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.251","article-title":"The N-HA\/PA66 cage versus the PEEK cage in anterior cervical fusion with single-level discectomy during 7 years of follow-up","volume":"123","author":"Hu","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.3109\/02688697.2010.503819","article-title":"Anterior cervical corpectomy: review and comparison of results using titanium mesh cages and carbon fibre reinforced polymer cages","volume":"24","author":"Kabir","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2421","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-013-2101-4","article-title":"Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite\/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy","volume":"37","author":"Yang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2014.11.3.127","article-title":"Comparison between two different cervical interbody fusion cages in one level stand-alone ACDF: carbon fiber composite frame cage versus polyetheretherketone cage","volume":"11","author":"Yoo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e96265","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0096265","article-title":"Evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite\/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients","volume":"9","author":"Zhang","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0031","article-title":"The SNAP trial: 2-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in patients after lumbar fusion surgery","author":"Kersten","year":"2021","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000843","article-title":"Factors influencing interbody cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"32","author":"Igarashi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"September","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-13-172","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages","volume":"13","author":"Cabraja","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disord"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E10","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.6.FOCUS20367","article-title":"PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence","volume":"49","author":"Campbell","year":"2020","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2012.9.3.181","article-title":"Comparative study between a curved and a wedge PEEK cage for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion","volume":"9","author":"Kim","year":"2012","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f","article-title":"Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"37","author":"Le","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-16-00390","article-title":"The effect of cervical interbody cage morphology, material composition, and substrate density on cage subsidence","volume":"25","author":"Suh","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E10","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.3.FOCUS201044","article-title":"Enhanced biomaterials: systematic review of alternatives to supplement spine fusion including silicon nitride, bioactive glass, amino peptide bone graft, and tantalum","volume":"50","author":"Brian","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"}],"container-title":["North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2666548422000713?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2666548422000713?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T01:43:26Z","timestamp":1762998206000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2666548422000713"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["S2666548422000713"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168","relation":{},"ISSN":["2666-5484"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2666-5484","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Silicon Nitride and Biomaterial Modulus as it Relates to Subsidence Risk in Spinal Fusion Surgery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xnsj.2022.100168","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of North American Spine Society.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100168"}}