{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T09:48:55Z","timestamp":1792057735751,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785110400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ophthalmologyscience.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmology Science"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T06:59:28Z","timestamp":1785826768000},"page":"101347","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Validation of the Reaction Time-Based False-Positive Rate as a Reliability Index for Standard Automated Perimetry"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"6","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9066-596X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hiroki","family":"Nomoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sachiko","family":"Okuyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chota","family":"Matsumoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2232-1828","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tairo","family":"Kimura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keiji","family":"Yoshikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shiro","family":"Mizoue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mami","family":"Nanno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shinji","family":"Kimura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Satoshi","family":"Inoue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8364-0948","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shunji","family":"Kusaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib1","series-title":"The Field Analyzer Primer: Effective Perimetry","author":"Heijl","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2021.06.026","article-title":"False positive responses in standard automated perimetry","volume":"233","author":"Heijl","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609","article-title":"Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma","volume":"133","author":"Rao","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib4","first-page":"2201","article-title":"False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?","volume":"41","author":"Bengtsson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib5","first-page":"417","article-title":"Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes","volume":"41","author":"Henson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1984.01040030560017","article-title":"Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma","volume":"102","author":"Flammer","year":"1984","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1544","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1987.01060110090039","article-title":"Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field","volume":"105","author":"Heijl","year":"1987","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib8","first-page":"513","article-title":"False-response monitoring during automated perimetry","volume":"75","author":"Vingrys","year":"1998","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00120.x","article-title":"An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry","volume":"75","author":"Olsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.1998.760303.x","article-title":"Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma","volume":"76","author":"Bengtsson","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.10.010","article-title":"A new SITA perimetric threshold testing algorithm: construction and a multicenter clinical study","volume":"198","author":"Heijl","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib12","first-page":"2654","article-title":"Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies","volume":"43","author":"Artes","year":"2002","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-42266-z","article-title":"Development and clinical validation of a novel visual field testing algorithm using spatial information: the Ambient Interactive ZEST (AIZE) algorithm","volume":"13","author":"Nomoto","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0161974","article-title":"Visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter 'imo'","volume":"11","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1805","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-026-07151-1","article-title":"Spatial occurrence of glaucomatous visual field damage in the combined 24-2 and 10-2 test locations","volume":"264","author":"Nomoto","year":"2026","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0127233","article-title":"Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations","volume":"10","author":"Rao","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4632","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.05-1598","article-title":"Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA algorithm","volume":"47","author":"Newkirk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/73.1.13","article-title":"Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models","volume":"73","author":"Liang","year":"1986","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib19","first-page":"129","article-title":"Response time as a discriminator between true- and false-positive responses in suprathreshold perimetry","volume":"43","author":"Artes","year":"2002","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.08-1789","article-title":"Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry","volume":"50","author":"Wall","year":"2009","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1996.01100130017003","article-title":"The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma","volume":"114","author":"Heijl","year":"1996","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.123.9.1201","article-title":"Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study","volume":"123","author":"Keltner","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib23","series-title":"Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics","author":"Green","year":"1966"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2014.04.013","article-title":"Response times across the visual field: empirical observations and application to threshold determination","volume":"101","author":"McKendrick","year":"2014","journal-title":"Vis Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03206815","article-title":"On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: pi\u00e9ron\u2019s law and choice reaction time","volume":"58","author":"Pins","year":"1996","journal-title":"Percept Psychophys"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1167\/5.5.1","article-title":"The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision","volume":"5","author":"Palmer","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Vis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2007.135012","article-title":"Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma","volume":"92","author":"Chauhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.02.005","article-title":"A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients","volume":"115","author":"Heijl","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347_bib29","first-page":"2471","article-title":"The relationship between visual field progression rate and longitudinal change in quality of life in patients with glaucoma","volume":"257","author":"Asaoka","year":"2019","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmology Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S266691452600285X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S266691452600285X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T09:24:38Z","timestamp":1792056278000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S266691452600285X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S266691452600285X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347","relation":{},"ISSN":["2666-9145"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2666-9145","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Validation of the Reaction Time-Based False-Positive Rate as a Reliability Index for Standard Automated Perimetry","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Ophthalmology Science","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xops.2026.101347","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101347"}}