{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T22:42:40Z","timestamp":1771368160942,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,1]],"date-time":"2011-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1314835200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Preventive Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,26]],"date-time":"2011-06-26T02:00:33Z","timestamp":1309053633000},"page":"134-140","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"title":["Digital mammography screening: Weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Rianne","family":"de Gelder","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacques","family":"Fracheboud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eveline A.M.","family":"Heijnsdijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gerard","family":"den Heeten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andr\u00e9 L.M.","family":"Verbeek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mireille J.M.","family":"Broeders","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gerrit","family":"Draisma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Harry J.","family":"de Koning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0010","unstructured":"De Gelder, R., Heijnsdijk, E. A. M., Van Ravesteyn, N. T., Fracheboud, J., Draisma, G. & De Koning, H. J. (accepted for publication) Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening Epidemiologic Reviews."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1369","article-title":"Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: microsimulation modelling estimates based on observed screen and clinical data","volume":"8","author":"De Koning","year":"2006","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2097","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-007-9395-7","article-title":"Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast","volume":"14","author":"De Roos","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2303","article-title":"Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts","volume":"189","author":"Del Turco","year":"2007","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1354","article-title":"Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer","volume":"7","author":"Duffy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-005-9101-z","article-title":"The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review","volume":"97","author":"Erbas","year":"2006","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res. Treat."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1136\/jms.8.3.149","article-title":"Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease?","volume":"8","author":"Evans","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Med. Screen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(05)70192-5","article-title":"Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography","volume":"38","author":"Feig","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiol. Clin. North Am."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0050","series-title":"TNM classification of malignant tumours","author":"International Union against Cancer","year":"1987"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1397","article-title":"Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: progression of ductal carcinoma in situ: the pathological perspective","volume":"8","author":"Jones","year":"2006","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2587","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2587","article-title":"Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends","volume":"339","author":"Jorgensen","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.218.3.r01mr29873","article-title":"Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations","volume":"218","author":"Lewin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.179.3.1790671","article-title":"Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer","volume":"179","author":"Lewin","year":"2002","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1258\/0969141041732201","article-title":"Modelling the impact of detecting and treating ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme","volume":"11","author":"Mccann","year":"2004","journal-title":"J. Med. Screen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2005.03.016","article-title":"Changing patterns in diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast","volume":"31","author":"Meijnen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur. J. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-009-9459-z","article-title":"Estimates of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer associated with screening mammography","volume":"21","author":"Morrell","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cancer Causes Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0095","series-title":"Main results breast cancer screening programme in the Netherlands","article-title":"NETB interim report 2007","author":"National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (Netb)","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0100","series-title":"Twelfth evaluation report","article-title":"National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 1990\u20132007","author":"National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (Netb)","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0105","series-title":"National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening","volume":"353","author":"Pisano","year":"2005","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461070200","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST","volume":"246","author":"Pisano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.20143","article-title":"Mammography benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: a model evaluation","volume":"110","author":"Rijnsburger","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2006.09.018","article-title":"Variations in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in the East Netherlands","volume":"33","author":"Schouten Van Der Velden","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur. J. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2293021171","article-title":"Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading\u2013Oslo I study","volume":"229","author":"Skaane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2443061478","article-title":"Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study","volume":"244","author":"Skaane","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1097\/01.coc.0000198740.33617.2f","article-title":"Biology of ductal carcinoma in situ classification based on biologic potential","volume":"29","author":"Tsikitis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am. J. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1038\/nrc2193","article-title":"Modelling breast cancer: one size does not fit all","volume":"7","author":"Vargo-Gogola","year":"2007","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0150","series-title":"Incidence data","author":"Vereniging Integrale Kankercentra Vikc","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-007-0730-y","article-title":"Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study","volume":"18","author":"Vigeland","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."}],"container-title":["Preventive Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0091743511002350?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0091743511002350?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]],"date-time":"2018-12-01T22:55:35Z","timestamp":1543704935000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0091743511002350"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0091743511002350"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0091-7435"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0091-7435","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]}}}