{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]],"date-time":"2024-07-02T02:18:48Z","timestamp":1719886728364},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,25]],"date-time":"2016-09-25T14:00:45Z","timestamp":1474812045000},"page":"186-187","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Skin sensitization risk assessment: Considering available data for weight of evidence assessments"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"82","author":[{"given":"Thomas A.","family":"Lewandowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joel M.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.2340\/0001555575463469","article-title":"The guinea pig maximization test - with a multiple dose design","volume":"75","author":"Andersen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Acta Derm. Venereol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.14573\/altex.1601251","article-title":"Toward good read-across practice (GRAP) guidance","volume":"33","author":"Ball","year":"2016","journal-title":"ALTEX"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2015.11.013","article-title":"Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: a review of underlying assumptions","volume":"74","author":"Basketter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-6915(97)00129-4","article-title":"Skin sensitization thresholds: determination in predictive models","volume":"35","author":"Basketter","year":"1997","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2014.01.004","article-title":"A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty","volume":"68","author":"Blackburn","year":"2014","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1080\/000155500750012126","article-title":"Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy","volume":"80","author":"Frankild","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Derm. Venereol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1093\/toxsci\/59.2.198","article-title":"Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment","volume":"59","author":"Kimber","year":"2001","journal-title":"Toxicol. Sci."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2015.04.020","article-title":"Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive","volume":"72","author":"Safford","year":"2015","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/0041-008X(85)90251-0","article-title":"Use of dose-response data to compare the skin sensitizing abilities of dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate and picryl chloride in two animal species","volume":"78","author":"Stadler","year":"1985","journal-title":"Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-483X(01)00425-5","article-title":"Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay","volume":"167","author":"van Och","year":"2001","journal-title":"Toxicology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06130.x","article-title":"Dose-response studies of contact allergens using 3 guinea pigs models","volume":"41","author":"Wahlkvist","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contact Dermat."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tox.2005.02.014","article-title":"Quantitative comparison of the results obtained by the multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test and the non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay for various biocides","volume":"211","author":"Yamano","year":"2005","journal-title":"Toxicology"}],"container-title":["Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0273230016302549?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0273230016302549?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,20]],"date-time":"2023-08-20T07:18:59Z","timestamp":1692515939000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0273230016302549"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":12,"alternative-id":["S0273230016302549"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["0273-2300"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0273-2300","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Skin sensitization risk assessment: Considering available data for weight of evidence assessments","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.09.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}