{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T12:05:46Z","timestamp":1784117146105,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,8]],"date-time":"2021-09-08T03:56:10Z","timestamp":1631073370000},"page":"105042","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"special_numbering":"C","title":["In silico assessment of genotoxicity. Combinations of sensitive structural alerts minimize false negative predictions for all genotoxicity endpoints and can single out chemicals for which experimentation can be avoided"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"126","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0943-1811","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Romualdo","family":"Benigni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2018.12.007","article-title":"Principles and procedures for handling out-of-domain and indeterminate results as part of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses","volume":"102","author":"Amberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gey020","article-title":"Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: is aromatic N-oxide a structural alert for predicting DNA-reactive mutagenicity?","volume":"34","author":"Amberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2016.02.004","article-title":"Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses","volume":"77","author":"Amberg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1002\/em.2860070613","article-title":"Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity","volume":"7","author":"Ashby","year":"1985","journal-title":"Environ. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1080\/17425255.2020.1785428","article-title":"In silico models for genotoxicity and drug regulation","volume":"16","author":"Benigni","year":"2020","journal-title":"Expet Opin. Drug Metabol. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2507","DOI":"10.1021\/cr100222q","article-title":"Mechanisms of chemical carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: a review with implications for predictive toxicology","volume":"111","author":"Benigni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Chem. Revs."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gey028","article-title":"Data-based review of QSARs for predicting genotoxicity: the state of the art","volume":"34","author":"Benigni","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1021\/cr300206t","article-title":"Nongenotoxic carcinogenicity of chemicals: mechanisms of action, and early recognition through a new set of structural alerts","volume":"113","author":"Benigni","year":"2013","journal-title":"Chem. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib9","series-title":"Development of Structure Alerts for the in Vivo Micronucleus Assay in Rodents","author":"Benigni","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104658","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2020.104658","article-title":"Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: an EFSA funded project","volume":"114","author":"Benigni","year":"2020","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib11","series-title":"Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process","author":"CDRH","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib12","first-page":"1","article-title":"QSAR Toolbox - workflow and major functionalities","author":"Dimitrov","year":"2016","journal-title":"SAR QSAR Environ. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib13","author":"EC","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib14","first-page":"2379","article-title":"Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and feed safety assessment","volume":"9","author":"EFSA","year":"2011","journal-title":"EFSA J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2015.05.008","article-title":"A practical application of two in silico systems for identification of potentially mutagenic impurities","volume":"72","author":"Greene","year":"2015","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2019.104403","article-title":"Genetic toxicology in silico protocol","volume":"107","author":"Hasselgren","year":"2019","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s41021-017-0091-y","article-title":"Necessity for retrospective evaluation of past-positive chemicals in in vitro chromosomal aberration tests using recommended cytotoxicity indices","volume":"40","author":"Honda","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gene Environ."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gey031","article-title":"Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames\/QSAR International Challenge Project","volume":"34","author":"Honma","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2018.09.026","article-title":"Construction and application of (Q)SAR models to predict chemical-induced in vitro chromosome aberrations","volume":"99","author":"Hsu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib20","series-title":"ICH Guideline S2 (R1) on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use","author":"ICH","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib21","series-title":"M7 Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk (R1)","author":"ICH","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib22","first-page":"880","article-title":"Going All in: A Strategic Investment in in Silico Toxicology","volume":"vol. 33","author":"Kostal","year":"2020"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2019.02.006","article-title":"Targets and mechanisms of chemically induced aneuploidy. Part 1 of the report of the 2017 IWGT workgroup on assessing the risk of aneugens for carcinogenesis and hereditary diseases","volume":"847","author":"Lynch","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutat. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib24","series-title":"Database Specific for the Pesticide Active Substance and Their Metabolites, Comprising the Main Genotoxicity Endpoints","author":"Metruccio","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gey017","article-title":"In silico prediction of chromosome damage: comparison of three (Q)SAR models","volume":"34","author":"Morita","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2018.04.014","article-title":"In silico toxicology protocols","volume":"96","author":"Myatt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib27","volume":"vol. 224","author":"OECD","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib28","series-title":"Statistical Methods in Toxicology","first-page":"35","article-title":"Measuring intra-assay agreement for the Ames Salmonella assay","author":"Piegorsch","year":"1991"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22250","article-title":"Evaluation of U. S. National toxicology Program (NTP) mouse lymphoma assay data using international workshop on genotoxicity tests (IWGT) and the organization for economic Co-operation and development (OECD) criteria","volume":"50","author":"Schisler","year":"2018","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4939-7899-1_2","article-title":"The OECD QSAR Toolbox starts its second decade","volume":"1800","author":"Schultz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Methods Mol. Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1126\/science.3554512","article-title":"Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays","volume":"236","author":"Tennant","year":"1987","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2219","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.chemrestox.0c00052","article-title":"Biological basis for threshold responses to methylating agents","volume":"33","author":"Thomas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Chem. Res. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403032","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2019.03.005","article-title":"Role of aneuploidy in the carcinogenic process: Part 3 of the report of the 2017 IWGT workgroup on assessing the risk of aneugens for carcinogenesis and hereditary diseases","volume":"847","author":"Tweats","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mutat. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2020.104620","article-title":"Development of improved QSAR models for predicting the outcome of the in vivo micronucleus genetic toxicity assay","volume":"113","author":"Yoo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib35","article-title":"Scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 501 (FGE.501): Grill flavour concentrate (vegetable)","volume":"17","author":"Younes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Efsa j"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib36","article-title":"Scientific Guidance for the preparation of applications on smoke flavouring primary products","volume":"19","author":"Younes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Efsa j"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/em.2850160502","article-title":"Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals","volume":"16","author":"Zeiger","year":"1990","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."}],"container-title":["Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0273230021001835?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0273230021001835?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,3]],"date-time":"2025-10-03T12:32:20Z","timestamp":1759494740000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0273230021001835"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"references-count":37,"alternative-id":["S0273230021001835"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042","relation":{},"ISSN":["0273-2300"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0273-2300","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"In silico assessment of genotoxicity. Combinations of sensitive structural alerts minimize false negative predictions for all genotoxicity endpoints and can single out chemicals for which experimentation can be avoided","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.yrtph.2021.105042","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"105042"}}