{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T20:48:08Z","timestamp":1760906888980,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1999,9,1]],"date-time":"1999-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":936144000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[1999,9,1]],"date-time":"1999-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":936144000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(99)70503-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,11,4]],"date-time":"2005-11-04T07:09:57Z","timestamp":1131088197000},"page":"626-629","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"181","author":[{"given":"Filomena","family":"Nunes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rosalinda","family":"Rodrigues","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Manuel","family":"Meirinho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00259-7","article-title":"Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix","volume":"90","author":"Xenakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(95)80009-H","article-title":"Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop\u2019s score: a comparison of three methods","volume":"58","author":"Orhue","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14230.x","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent","volume":"100","author":"Fletcher","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)90194-8","article-title":"Misoprostol to induce labour","volume":"339","author":"Margulies","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)02368-M","article-title":"Low-dose vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour with a live fetus","volume":"49","author":"Bugalho","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1811","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91416-1","article-title":"Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"172","author":"Wing","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00248-8","article-title":"Induction of labor with intravaginal administration of misoprostol","volume":"60","author":"Rodrigues","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70267-3","article-title":"A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"175","author":"Wing","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70006-1","article-title":"A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor","volume":"177","author":"Surbek","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00673-X","article-title":"Labour induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00015-X","article-title":"A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices","volume":"89","author":"Buser","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293789970503X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293789970503X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:12:23Z","timestamp":1757585543000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293789970503X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1999,9]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293789970503X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(99)70503-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0002-9378"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1999,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 1999 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}