{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T16:06:00Z","timestamp":1769184360456,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,1,1]],"date-time":"2004-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1072915200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,1,1]],"date-time":"2004-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1072915200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/s0301-2115(03)00191-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,11,8]],"date-time":"2003-11-08T07:12:47Z","timestamp":1068275567000},"page":"49-54","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"112","author":[{"given":"Diogo","family":"Ayres-de-Campos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Bernardes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Karel","family":"Marsal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Carsten","family":"Nickelsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Leo","family":"Makarainen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Philip","family":"Banfield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Pedro","family":"Xavier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Isabel","family":"Campos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15851.x","article-title":"Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms","volume":"85","author":"Trimbos","year":"1978","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04695.x","article-title":"Baseline in human fetal heart-rate records","volume":"89","author":"Dawes","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"3 Part 1","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90831-5","article-title":"A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings","volume":"168","author":"Gagnon","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB4","first-page":"165","article-title":"Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate. II. Comparison with the interpretation of experts","volume":"3","author":"Arduini","year":"1993","journal-title":"J. Matern. Fetal Invest."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09844.x","article-title":"A more objective fetal heart rate baseline estimation","volume":"103","author":"Bernardes","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-2115(96)02487-6","article-title":"Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment","volume":"68","author":"Todros","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10935.x","article-title":"Computerised estimation of the baseline fetal heart rate in labour: the low frequency line","volume":"104","author":"Mongelli","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11112.x","article-title":"The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour","volume":"107","author":"Taylor","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107665","article-title":"A comparison of visual analysis of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system","volume":"183","author":"Devoe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(87)90012-9","article-title":"FIGO news: guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring","volume":"25","author":"Rooth","year":"1987","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(6):1385\u201390.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70079-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70401-6","article-title":"Some concerns about the new research guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring","volume":"179","author":"Bernardes","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(82)90106-2","article-title":"Are there behavioural states in the human fetus?","volume":"6","author":"Nijhuis","year":"1982","journal-title":"Early Hum. Dev."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)80008-2","article-title":"Fetal and maternal diurnal rhythms during the third trimester of normal pregnancy: outcomes of computerized analysis of continuous twenty-four-hour fetal heart rate recordings","volume":"178","author":"Lunshof","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB15","first-page":"999","article-title":"Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?","volume":"82","author":"Stanco","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00143-8","article-title":"Development of fetal heart rate and behaviour: indirect measures to assess the fetal nervous system","volume":"87","author":"Nijhuis","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB17","first-page":"105","article-title":"Fetal heart rate baselines in twins: interobserver agreement in antepartum estimation","volume":"45","author":"Bernardes","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Reprod. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB18","unstructured":"Shoukri MM, Edge VL. Statistical methods for health sciences. New York: CRC Press; 1996."},{"issue":"8735","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)92169-3","article-title":"The fetal heart rate is normal, isn\u2019t it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments","volume":"337","author":"Grant","year":"1991","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8476","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12063.x","article-title":"Evaluating measurement variability in clinical investigations: the case of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume","volume":"104","author":"Khan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X_BIB22","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Education and training. In: The use of electronic fetal monitoring\u2014evidence-based guideline number 8. London: RCOG Press; 2001. p. 63\u20135."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121150300191X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121150300191X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:10:27Z","timestamp":1759554627000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121150300191X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S030121150300191X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0301-2115(03)00191-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00191-X","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"converted-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}