{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,24]],"date-time":"2024-01-24T09:38:09Z","timestamp":1706089089474},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"S1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,16]],"date-time":"2020-04-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1586995200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":4123,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur. psychiatr."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Screening for postpartum depression has been considered essential. The Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS; Beck &amp; Gable, 2002) is a self-report instrument, composed of 35 items placed in the specific context of new maternity. The aim of the present study was to determine, for the first time, PDSS cut-off points (adjusted to the real prevalence) and associated conditional probabilities to screen for depression in the post-partum, according to DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria. Participants were 452 women, mean age=30.52 years (SD=4.176) in their third month post-partum (M=13.07 weeks post-partum; SD=1.808). All women completed the Portuguese version of the PDSS and were interviewed using the Mood disorders Section\/Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. ROC analysis was applied and both cut-off points and associated conditional probabilities adjusted to the real prevalence were determined. For major depression\/DSM-IV the cut-off point of 69 (prevalence - 4.0%), resulted in sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 86.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 19.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.9%; for depressive disorder\/ICD-10 the cut-off point of 67 (prevalence - 4.9%) determined sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 85.3%, PPV 21.2%, NPV 98.6%; for mild\/moderate depression with somatic syndrome or severe depression without psychotic symptoms\/ICD-10 (prevalence - 2.7%) the cut-off point of 80 was associated to sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 94.3%, PPV 30.6% and NPV 99.8%.In conclusion, the Portuguese version of the PDSS revealed to be a valid instrument to screen for depression in the post-partum.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:sup>*<\/jats:sup>Data for this study were drawn from a research project on <jats:italic>Postpartum Depression and Sleep,<\/jats:italic> FCT (POCI\/SAU-ESP\/57068\/2004).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1016\/s0924-9338(09)70903-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,3,14]],"date-time":"2009-03-14T10:48:12Z","timestamp":1237027692000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Screening Acuracy of the Portuguese Version of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Pereira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"S.","family":"Bos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"B.","family":"Maia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M.","family":"Marques","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M.J.","family":"Soares","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"A.","family":"Gomes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"J.","family":"Valente","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"A.","family":"Macedo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M.H.","family":"Azevedo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,16]]},"container-title":["European Psychiatry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0924933809709034?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0924933809709034?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S092493380016794X","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,24]],"date-time":"2024-01-24T08:33:36Z","timestamp":1706085216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S092493380016794X\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S092493380016794X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0924-9338(09)70903-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-9338","1778-3585"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-9338","type":"print"},{"value":"1778-3585","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"article-number":"24-E670"}}