{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,1]],"date-time":"2022-04-01T20:47:12Z","timestamp":1648846032654},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,7]],"date-time":"2005-06-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1118102400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":218,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AIEDAM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper describes an approach to the analysis of design concepts \n(DCs) using the rough set theory. The proposed approach attempts to \nextract design knowledge from past designs, and used the knowledge \nobtained to perform DC\u2013capability mapping in a dynamic design \nevolution environment. The mapping enables designers to estimate the \nfeasibility of a DC to meet stipulated design specifications. The proposed \napproach encompasses two algorithms, namely, the dissimilar objects \nalgorithm and the attribute decomposition algorithm, to deal with an \ninformation system with unavailable information and multidecision \nattributes, respectively. The details of these algorithms are presented. A \ncase study on the design of vacuum cleaners is used to illustrate the \ncapability of the proposed approach.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0890060404040211","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,8]],"date-time":"2005-06-08T17:54:05Z","timestamp":1118253245000},"page":"343-355","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["An approach to the analysis of design concepts using the rough set \ntheory"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"D.","family":"ALISANTOSO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.P.","family":"KHOO","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I.B.H.","family":"LEE","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reich, Y. & Barai, S.V. (1999).Evaluating Machine learning models for engineering problems.Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 13,257\u2013272.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0954-1810(98)00021-1"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref004","unstructured":"Hundal, M.S. (1997).Systematical Mechanical Designing: A Cost and ManagementPerspective.New York:American Society of Mechanical Engineers."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-0255(98)10019-1"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00207540110072254"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref002","unstructured":"Felix, R. & Ushio, T. (1999).Rules induction from inconsistent and incomplete data using roughsets.Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,Vol. 5, pp.154\u2013158,Tokyo,October 12\u201315."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref021","unstructured":"Zhai, L.Y. , Khoo, L.P. , & Fok, S.C. (2001).Derivation of decision rules for the evaluation of productperformance using genetic algorithms and rough set theory. InData Mining for Design and Manufacturing( Braha, D. , Ed.), pp.337\u2013353.Boston:Kluwer."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref020","unstructured":"Wills, L.M. & Kolodner, J.L. (1994).Towards more creative case-based design systems.Proc. 12th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence,Seattle, WA,August."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref011","unstructured":"Liang, J. & Xu, C. (2000).Uncertainty measures of roughness of knowledge and rough sets inincomplete information systems.Proc. Third World Congr. on Intelligent Control andAutomation, pp.2526\u20132529,Hefei, China,June 28\u2013July 2."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref006","unstructured":"Komorowski, J. , Pawlak, Z. , Polkowski, L. , & Skowron, A. (1999).Rough sets: A tutorial. InRough Fuzzy Hybridization( Skowron, A. , Ed.), pp.3\u201398.New York:Springer\u2013Verlag."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pawlak, Z. (1998).Granularity of knowledge, indiscernibility and rough sets.Proc. IEEE World Congr. Computational Intelligence and IEEEInternational Conf. Fuzzy Systems,Vol. 1, pp.106\u2013110,Anchorage, AK,May 4\u20139.","DOI":"10.1109\/FUZZY.1998.687467"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref001","unstructured":"Arciszewski, T. , Ziarko, W. , & Khan, T.L. (1993).Learning conceptual design rules: A rough set approach. InRough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery( Ziarko, W.P. , Ed.), pp.444\u2013449.New York:Springer\u2013Verlag."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pawlak, Z. (1996).Why rough sets? Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Fuzzy Systems,Vol. 2, pp.738\u2013743,New Orleans, LA,September 8\u201311.","DOI":"10.1109\/FUZZY.1996.552272"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref003","unstructured":"Grzymala\u2013Busse, J.W. & Hu, M. (2000).A Comparison of several approaches to missing attribute values indata mining.Second Int. Conf. Rough Sets and Current Trends inComputing, pp. 340\u2013347,Banff, Canada,October 16\u201319."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref012","unstructured":"Mollestad, T. & Komorowski, J. (1999).A Rough set framework for mining propositional defaultrules. InRough Fuzzy Hybridization( Skowron, A. , Ed.), pp.233\u2013262.New York:Springer\u2013Verlag."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kusiak, A. , Kern, J.A. , Kernstine, K.H. , & Tseng, B.T.L. (2000).Autonomous decision-making: a data mining approach.IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 4(4),274\u2013284.","DOI":"10.1109\/4233.897059"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nguyen, H.P. , Le, L.P. , Santiprabhob, P. , & De Baets, B. (2001).Approach to generating rules for expert systems using rough settheory.Joint 9th IFSA World Congr. and 20th NAFIPS Int.Congr., Vol. 2, pp.877\u2013882,Vancouver, Canada,July 27.","DOI":"10.1109\/NAFIPS.2001.944720"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01001956"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref018","unstructured":"Ulrich, K.T. & Eppinger, S.D. (2000).Product Design and Development.New York:McGraw\u2013Hill."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref019","unstructured":"Wang, G. (2002).Extension of rough set under incomplete information systems.Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Systems,Vol. 2, pp.1098\u20131103,Honolulu, HI,May 12\u201317."},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4754(02)00017-4"},{"key":"S0890060404040211_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kryszkiewicz, M. (1999).Rules in incomplete information systems.Information Sciences 112,271\u2013292.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-0255(98)10065-8"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0890060404040211","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,6]],"date-time":"2019-05-06T19:54:02Z","timestamp":1557172442000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0890060404040211\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0890060404040211"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0890060404040211","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-0604","1469-1760"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-0604","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1760","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]}}}