{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]],"date-time":"2023-05-05T02:11:01Z","timestamp":1683252661906},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,7]],"date-time":"2005-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1128643200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":67,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AIEDAM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Design couples synthesis and analysis in iterative cycles, alternatively generating solutions, and evaluating their validity. The accuracy and depth of evaluation has increased markedly because of the availability of powerful simulation tools and the development of domain-specific knowledge bases. Efforts to extend the state of the art in evaluation have unfortunately been carried out in stovepipe fashion, depending on domain-specific views both of function and of what constitutes \u201cgood\u201d design. Although synthesis as practiced by humans is an intentional process that centers on the notion of function, computational synthesis often eschews such intention for sheer permutation. Rather than combining synthesis and analysis to form an integrated design environment, current methods focus on comprehensive search for solutions within highly circumscribed subdomains of design. This paper presents an overview of the progress made in representing design function across abstraction levels proven useful to human designers. Through an example application in the domain of mechatronics, these representations are integrated across domains and throughout the design process.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0890060405050134","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,7]],"date-time":"2005-10-07T20:59:04Z","timestamp":1128718744000},"page":"183-200","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Integrating functional synthesis"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"WILLIAM H.","family":"WOOD","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"HUI","family":"DONG","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"CLIVE L.","family":"DYM","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref008","unstructured":"Dong, H. & Wood, W. (2004).Integrating computational synthesis and decision-based conceptualdesign.Proc. ASME 2004 Design Theory and Methodology Conf.,Paper No. DETC2004-57481,Salt Lake City, UT."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref038","unstructured":"Verma, M. & Wood, W. (2004).Toward case-based functional design: matching reverse engineeringpractice with the design process.Unpublished manuscript."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gietka, P. , Verma, M. , & Wood, W.H. (2002).Functional modeling, reverse engineering, and design reuse.Proc. ASME 2002 Design Theory and Methodology Conf.,Paper No. DETC2002\/DTM-34019,Montreal, Canada.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2002\/DTM-34019"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh, T.P. (1994).An approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanicalconceptual design. Part I: knowledge representation.Research in Engineering Design 6(3),127\u2013141.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01607275"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01206363"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref033","unstructured":"Ullman, D.G. (1992a).The Mechanical Design Process.New York:McGraw\u2013Hill."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0094-114X(98)00037-8"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stone, R.B. & Wood, K.L. (2000).Development of a functional basis for design.Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4),359\u2013370.","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1289637"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1625400"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh, T.P. (1996a).Approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanicalconceptual design. Part II: kind synthesis.Research in Engineering Design 8(1),52\u201362.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01616556"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.2826110"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh, T.P. (2001).A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design.Design Studies 22,493\u2013517.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0142-694X(01)00008-4"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verma, M. & Wood, W.H. (2001).Form follows function: case-based learning over productevolution.Proc. ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conf.,Paper No. DETC2001\/DFM-21182,Pittsburgh, PA.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2001\/DFM-21182"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref029","unstructured":"Shea, K. & Cagan, J. (1997).Innovative dome design: applying geodesic patterns with shapeannealing.Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, andManufacture 13(3),241\u2013251."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref040","unstructured":"Yoshikawa, H. (1981).General design theory and a CAD system.Man-Machine Communications in CAD\/CAM,Proc. IFIP WG 5.2-5.3 Working Conf. (Computer AidedDesign\/Computer Aided Manufacturing), pp.35\u201358,Tokyo. Amsterdam:North-Holland."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fagade, A. & Kazmer, D. (1999).Optimal component consolidation in molded product design.Proc. ASME 1999 Design for Manufacture Conf.,Paper No. DETC1999\/DFM-8921,Las Vegas, NV.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC99\/DFM-8921"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref001","unstructured":"Boothroyd, G. , Dewhurst, P. , & Knight, W. (2001).Product Design for Manufacturing and Assembly,2nd ed. New York:Marcel Dekker."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref011","unstructured":"Dym, C.L. & Brey, P. (2000).Languages of engineering design: Empirical constructs forrepresenting objects and articulating processes.Research in Philosophy and Technology 20,119\u2013148."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0890060400001633"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1315299"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref009","unstructured":"Dym, C.L. (1994a).Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views.New York:Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leifer, L. (1994).Personal communication.","DOI":"10.1355\/SEAA94A"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ullman, D.G. (1992b).A taxonomy for mechanical design.Research in Engineering Design 3.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01580519"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh, T.P. (1996b).Approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanicalconceptual design. Part III: spatial configuration.Research in Engineering Design 8(2),116\u2013124.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01607865"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McAdams, D.A. , Stone, R.B. , & Wood, K.L. (1999).Functional interdependence and product similarity based on customerneeds.Research in Engineering Design 11(1),1\u201319.","DOI":"10.1007\/s001630050001"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dym, C.L. (1994b).Representing designed objects: the languages of engineeringdesign.Archives for Computational Methods in Engineering 1(1),75\u2013108.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02736181"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref016","unstructured":"Kota, S. & Erdman, A.G. (1997).Motion control in product design.Mechanical Engineering August,74\u201376."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref028","unstructured":"Sharpe, J.E.E. & Bracewell, R.H. (1996).Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitativescheme generation\u2014\u201cschemebuilder.\u201d Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis andManufacturing 10(5),333\u2013345."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref015","unstructured":"Hauser, J.R. & Clausing, D. (1988).The house of quality.Harvard Business Review May\u2013June,63\u201373."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref019","unstructured":"Maher, M.L. & Pu, P. (1997).Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verma, M. & Wood, W. (2003).Functional modeling: toward a common language for design and reverseengineering.Proc. ASME 2003 Design Theory and Methodology Conf.,Paper No. DETC2003\/DTM-48660,Chicago.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2003\/DTM-48660"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wood, W.H. & Agogino, A.M. (2005).Decision-based conceptual design: modeling and navigatingheterogeneous design spaces.ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 127(1),2\u201311.","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1799612"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref031","unstructured":"Swift, K.G. & Booker, J.D. (1997).Process Delection from Design to Manufacture.London:Arnold."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref021","unstructured":"Navinchandra, D. (1988).Behavioral synthesis in cadet, a case-based design tool.Proc. DARPA Workshop on Case-based Reasoning, pp.286\u2013301.San Mateo, CA:Morgan\u2013Kaufman."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref022","unstructured":"Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. (1988).Engineering Design\u2014A Systematic Approach.New York:Springer\u2013Verlag."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raghavan, A. & Stahovich, T.F. (1998).Computing design rationales by interpreting simulations.Proc. ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conf.,Paper No. DETC1998\/DTM-5662,Atlanta, GA.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC98\/DTM-5652"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/64.311276"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref026","unstructured":"Roth, K. (1987).Design models and design catalogs.Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED'87), pp.60\u201366."},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s003660070003"},{"key":"S0890060405050134_ref032","unstructured":"Takeda, H. , Veerkamp, P. , Tomiyamo, T. , & Yoshikawa, H. (1990).Modeling design processes.AI Magazine 11(4),37\u201348."}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0890060405050134","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]],"date-time":"2023-05-05T01:29:05Z","timestamp":1683250145000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0890060405050134\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,8]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0890060405050134"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0890060405050134","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-0604","1469-1760"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-0604","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1760","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,8]]}}}