{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:49:21Z","timestamp":1772758161900,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,30]],"date-time":"2014-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1412035200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AIEDAM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Adaptability can have many different definitions: reliability, robustness, survivability, and changeability (adaptability to requirements change). In this research, we focused entirely on the last type. We discuss two alternative approaches to requirements change adaptability. One is the valuation approach that is based on utility and cost of design changes in response to modified requirements. The valuation approach is theoretically sound because it is based on utility and decision theory, but it may be difficult to use in the real world. The second approach is based on examining product architecture characteristics that facilitate changes that include modularity, hierarchy, interfaces, performance sensitivity, and design margins. This approach is heuristic in nature but more practical to use. If calibrated, it could serve as a surrogate for real adaptability. These measures were incorporated in a software tool for exploring alternative configurations of fractionated space satellite systems.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0890060414000523","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,30]],"date-time":"2014-09-30T07:02:51Z","timestamp":1412060571000},"page":"353-368","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Measures of product design adaptability for changing requirements"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Serdar","family":"Uckun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ryan","family":"Mackey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Minh","family":"Do","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rong","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jami J.","family":"Shah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0890060404040077"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0954482031000091103"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0048-7333(94)00775-3"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref36","volume-title":"Axiomatic Design","author":"Suh","year":"2000"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.2829325"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref31","first-page":"467","article-title":"The architecture of complexity","volume":"106","author":"Simon","year":"1962","journal-title":"Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.4004379"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2004.09.011"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sys.20098"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref21","unstructured":"Newcomb P.J. , Bras B. , & Rosen D.W. (2001). Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1063293X08096178"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref16","volume-title":"The Power of Product Platforms","author":"Lehnerd","year":"1997"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1320820"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref13","unstructured":"Kalligeros K. , de Weck O. , Neufille R. , & Luckins A. (2006). Platform identification using design structure matrices. Proc. 16th Int. Symp. INCOSE, July."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cad.2003.09.012"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref11","unstructured":"H\u00f6ltt\u00e4 K. , Suh E.S. , & de Weck O. (2005). Trade-off between modularity and performance for engineered systems and products. Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, August 15\u201318."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref10","unstructured":"Hashemian M. (2005). Design for adaptability. PhD Thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Canada."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guo F. , & Gershenson J.K. (2004). A comparison of modular product design methods based on improvement and iteration. Proc. 2004 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf.\/Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., pp. 261\u2013269.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2004-57396"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.2829433"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref2","unstructured":"Bischof A. , & Blessing L. (2008). Guidelines for the development of flexible products. Int. Design Conf., Design 2008, Dubrovnik, May 19\u201322."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.destud.2004.09.007"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Strong M.B. , Magleby S. , & Parkinson A. (2003). A classification method to compare modular product concepts. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., pp. 657\u2013668, Chicago, September 2\u20136.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2003\/DTM-48661"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00170-007-1010-3"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2004.09.011"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guo F. , & Gershenson J.K. (2003). Comparison of modular measurement methods based on consistency analysis and sensitivity analysis. Proc. 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., Chicago, September.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2003\/DTM-48634"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref19","volume-title":"Games and Decisions","author":"Luce","year":"1957"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref26","unstructured":"Shaw G.B. , Miller D. , & Hastings D. (1999). The Generalized Information Network Analysis Methodology for Distributed Satellite Systems. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00163-007-0032-z"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref1","volume-title":"Managing in an Age of Modularity","author":"Baldwin","year":"2003"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref29","volume-title":"Analytical Decision-Making in Engineering Design","author":"Siddall","year":"1972"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.802469"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref7","volume-title":"The Multiple Faces of Modularity\u2014A Literature Analysis of a Product Concept for Assembled Hardware Products","author":"Fixson","year":"2003"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref23","volume-title":"Engineering Design","author":"Pahl","year":"1995"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref22","volume-title":"Metrics for Assessing a Software System's Maintainability","author":"Oman","year":"1992"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref20","unstructured":"Neufille R. (n.d.). Flexibility in engineering design with examples from electric power systems. Powerpoint presentation."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref38","volume-title":"Product Design and Development","author":"Ulrich","year":"2011"},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref3","unstructured":"Chalupnik M. , Wynn D. , & Clarkson J. (2009). Approaches to mitigate the impact of uncertainty in development processes. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED2009, Stanford, August."},{"key":"S0890060414000523_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0890060404040028"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0890060414000523","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,21]],"date-time":"2019-04-21T19:14:17Z","timestamp":1555874057000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0890060414000523\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,30]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0890060414000523"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0890060414000523","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-0604","1469-1760"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-0604","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1760","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,30]]}}}