{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,10]],"date-time":"2022-07-10T06:40:43Z","timestamp":1657435243685},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,4]],"date-time":"2016-10-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475539200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AIEDAM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Identifying failure paths and potentially hazardous scenarios resulting from component faults and interactions is a challenge in the early design process. The inherent complexity present in large engineered systems leads to nonobvious emergent behavior, which may result in unforeseen hazards. Current hazard analysis techniques focus on single hazards (fault trees), single faults (event trees), or lists of known hazards in the domain (hazard identification). Early in the design of a complex system, engineers may represent their system as a functional model. A function failure reasoning tool can then exhaustively simulate qualitative failure scenarios. Some scenarios can be identified as hazardous by hazard rules specified by the engineer, but the goal is to identify scenarios representing unknown hazards. The incidences of specific subgraphs in graph representations of known hazardous scenarios are used to train a classifier to distinguish hazard from nonhazard. The algorithm identifies the scenario most likely to be hazardous, and presents it to the engineer. After viewing the scenario and judging its safety, the engineer may have insight to produce additional hazard rules. The collaborative process of strategic presentation of scenarios by the computer and human judgment will identify previously unknown hazards. The feasibility of this methodology has been tested on a relatively simple functional model of an electrical power system with positive results. Related work applying function failure reasoning to a team of robotic rovers will provide data from a more complex system.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s089006041600041x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,4]],"date-time":"2016-10-04T11:48:49Z","timestamp":1475581729000},"page":"466-473","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Safety-informed design: Using subgraph analysis to elicit hazardous emergent failure behavior in complex systems"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Matthew G.","family":"McIntire","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Christopher","family":"Hoyle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Irem Y.","family":"Tumer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"David C.","family":"Jensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1765117"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref1","volume-title":"Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models: Theory and Methods","volume":"115","author":"Bain","year":"1991"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kurtoglu T. , Johnson S. , Barszcz E. , Johnson J. , & Robinson P. (2008). Integrating system health management into early design of aerospace systems using functional fault analysis. Proc. Int. Conf. Prognostics and Heath Management, PHM'08, pp. 1\u201311. New York: IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/PHM.2008.4711425"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/64.311276"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref36","volume-title":"The Mechanical Design Process","author":"Ullman","year":"2003"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref16","unstructured":"Jensen D. , Tumer I. , & Kurtoglu T. (2009 b). Flow state logic (FSL) for analysis of failure propagation in early design. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf.; International Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 1033\u20131043, San Diego, CA, August 30\u2013September 2."},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref6","volume-title":"Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report","volume":"1","year":"2003"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref7","first-page":"126","article-title":"Implementation procedures for the risk in early design (RED) method","volume":"2","author":"Grantham-Lough","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.4005230"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00163-002-0024-y"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0957-4174(96)00027-9"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref24","volume-title":"Quality Engineering Using Robust Design","author":"Padhke","year":"1989"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2011-47767"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref39","volume-title":"The Fault Tree Handbook","author":"Vesely","year":"1981"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref4","volume-title":"Quality Function Deployment","author":"Clausing","year":"1994"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-349-18478-1"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ketkar N. , Holder L. , & Cook D. (2005). Subdue: compression-based frequent pattern discovery in graph data. Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Open Source Data Mining: Frequent Pattern Mining Implementations, pp. 71\u201376. New York: ACM.","DOI":"10.1145\/1133905.1133915"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1515\/IJMSP.2000.3.2-4.77","article-title":"Representation of functional relations among parts and its application to product failure reasoning","volume":"3","author":"Hata","year":"2000","journal-title":"International Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-0823-8","volume-title":"System Safety: HAZOP and Software HAZOP","author":"Redmill","year":"1999"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.2885181"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref37","unstructured":"Umeda Y. , Tomiyama T. , & Yoshikawa H. (1992). A design methodology for a self-maintenance machine based on functional redundancy. Proc. Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, p. 317, Edinburgh, August 19\u201321."},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref31","volume-title":"Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners","volume":"1.1","author":"Stamatelatos","year":"2002"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TC.2010.245"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref40","unstructured":"Wang K. , & Jin Y. (2002). An analytical approach to function design. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, IDETC CIE, pp. 449\u2013459, Quebec, September 29\u2013October 2."},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huang Z. , & Jin Y. (2008). Conceptual stress and conceptual strength for functional design-for- reliability. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf.; Int. Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 437\u2013447, Brooklyn, NY, August 3\u20136.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2008-49347"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref22","volume-title":"Engineering a Safer World","author":"Leveson","year":"2011"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref23","volume-title":"Procedures for Performing Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis","year":"1980"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref15","unstructured":"Jensen D. , Tumer I. , & Kurtoglu T. (2009 a). Design of an electrical power system using a functional failure and flow state logic reasoning methodology. Proc. Prognostics and Health Management Society Conf., San Diego, CA, September 27\u2013October 1."},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jensen D. , Tumer I. , & Kurtoglu T. (2008). Modeling the propagation of failures in software-driven hardware systems to enable risk-informed design. Proc. ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Cong. Exposition, pp. 283\u2013293. Boston, October 31\u2013November 6.","DOI":"10.1115\/IMECE2008-68861"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mechatronics.2012.01.003"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref26","volume-title":"A System-Theoretic Hazard Analysis Methodology for a Non-Advocate Safety Assessment of the Ballistic Missile Defense System","author":"Pereira","year":"2006"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0890060414000547"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref11","unstructured":"Hollnagel E. , & Goteman O. (2004). The functional resonance accident model. Proc. Cognitive System Engineering in Process Plant, pp. 155\u2013161."},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref8","first-page":"144","article-title":"The risk in early design method","volume":"20","author":"Grantham-Lough","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of Engineering Design"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00163-005-0005-z"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1862678"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00163-001-0008-3"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09544820500273268"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00163-010-0086-1"},{"key":"S089006041600041X_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krus D. , & Grantham-Lough K. (2007). Applying function-based failure propagation in conceptual design. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf.; Int. Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 407\u2013420. Las Vegas, NV, November 4\u20137.","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2007-35475"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S089006041600041X","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,9]],"date-time":"2022-07-09T17:06:30Z","timestamp":1657386390000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S089006041600041X\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,4]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S089006041600041X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s089006041600041x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0890-0604","1469-1760"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0890-0604","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1760","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,4]]}}}