{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T03:34:46Z","timestamp":1771472086798,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]],"date-time":"2011-04-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1303344000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Philosophical applications of familiar paracomplete and paraconsistent logics often rely on an idea of \u2018default classicality\u2019. With respect to the paraconsistent logic LP (the dual of Strong Kleene or K3), such \u2018default classicality\u2019 is standardly cashed out via an LP-based nonmonotonic logic due to Priest (1991, 2006a). In this paper, I offer an alternative approach via a monotonic multiple-conclusion version of LP.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020311000074","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]],"date-time":"2011-04-21T04:15:06Z","timestamp":1303359306000},"page":"326-336","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"title":["MULTIPLE-CONCLUSION LP AND DEFAULT CLASSICALITY"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"4","author":[{"given":"JC","family":"BEALL","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref27","unstructured":"Ripley D. (2011). Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth. To appear. Presented at a 2010 meeting of the Melbourne Logic Group."},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref26","first-page":"189","volume-title":"Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Twelth International Congress","author":"Restall","year":"2005"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0005"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref1","volume-title":"Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity","volume":"2","author":"Anderson","year":"1992"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref3","unstructured":"Baaz M. , Ferm\u00fcller C. G. , & Zach R. (1993a). Dual systems of sequents and tableaux for many-valued logics. Technical Report TUW-E185.2-BFZ.2\u201392."},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref25","volume-title":"Logic: An Introduction","author":"Restall","year":"2005"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00453020"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199230747.001.0001"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2024634"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref12","unstructured":"Dunn J. M . (1966). The algebra of intensional logics. PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh."},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/IV.14.278"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258428"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511801174"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref14","first-page":"460","article-title":"Reply to Restall","volume":"147","author":"Field","year":"2010","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203851555","volume-title":"Logic: The Basics","author":"Beall","year":"2010"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref9","first-page":"337","volume-title":"Philosophy of Language\/Philosophical Logic","author":"Belnap","year":"1973"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00048409612347131"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093958482"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref4","unstructured":"Baaz M. , Ferm\u00fcller C. G. , & Zach R. (1993b). Systematic construction of natural deduction systems for many-valued logics: Extended report. Technical Report TUW-E185.2-BFZ.1\u201393."},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref7","volume-title":"Supplement to Logic: The Basics","author":"Beall","year":"2011"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref8","volume-title":"Possibilities and Paradox: An Introduction to Modal and Many-Valued Logic","author":"Beall","year":"2003"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref10","volume-title":"Universal Logic","volume":"109","author":"Brady","year":"2006"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref16","volume-title":"Change in View: Principles of Reasoning","author":"Harman","year":"1986"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370190"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199268733.001.0001"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref21","volume-title":"Doubt Truth to be a Liar","author":"Priest","year":"2006"},{"key":"S1755020311000074_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199263301.001.0001"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1755020311000074","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,27]],"date-time":"2019-04-27T04:30:30Z","timestamp":1556339430000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1755020311000074\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1755020311000074"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020311000074","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,21]]}}}