{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]],"date-time":"2025-03-24T07:29:24Z","timestamp":1742801364932},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,25]],"date-time":"2014-02-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1393286400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Is there a notion of<jats:italic>contradiction<\/jats:italic>\u2014let us call it, for dramatic effect, \u201cabsolute\u201d\u2014making<jats:italic>all<\/jats:italic>contradictions, so understood, unacceptable also for dialetheists? It is argued in this paper that there is, and that spelling it out brings some theoretical benefits. First it gives us a foothold on undisputed ground in the methodologically difficult debate on dialetheism. Second, we can use it to express, without begging questions, the disagreement between dialetheists and their rivals on the nature of truth. Third, dialetheism has an operator allowing it, against the opinion of many critics, to rule things out and manifest disagreement: for unlike other proposed exclusion-expressing-devices (for instance, the entailment of triviality), the operator used to formulate the notion of absolute contradiction appears to be immune both from crippling expressive limitations and from revenge paradoxes\u2014<jats:italic>pending<\/jats:italic>a rigorous nontriviality proof for a formal dialetheic theory including it.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s175502031400001x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,25]],"date-time":"2014-02-25T11:29:10Z","timestamp":1393327750000},"page":"193-207","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTION, DIALETHEISM, AND REVENGE"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"FRANCESCO","family":"BERTO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv2x8v8c7.20","volume-title":"Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent","author":"Slaney","year":"1989"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0020"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00652069"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2216219"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.1990.10716495"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref2","volume-title":"The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy","author":"Beall","year":"2008"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9309-0_3"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199546046.003.0005","volume-title":"Metametaphysics","author":"Fine","year":"2009"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9213.2010.678.x"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020311000177"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470696675"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref41","first-page":"457","volume-title":"Handbook of Paraconsistency","author":"Slater","year":"2007"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0017"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199268733.001.0001"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/39.3.124"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref7","volume-title":"The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy","author":"Berto","year":"2013"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref5","volume-title":"How to Sell a Contradiction. The Logic and Metaphysics of Inconsistency","author":"Berto","year":"2007"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01057653"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-010-9225-y"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref4","unstructured":"Beall J. C. , & Murzi J . (forthcoming). Two flavors of Curry paradox. Journal of Philosophy."},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref16","volume-title":"On the Plenitude of Truth: A Defense of Trivialism","author":"Kabay","year":"2010"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/67.1.17"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0007"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9309-0_13"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-3687-4"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00048400801886199"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0021"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093870447"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00838036"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2564636"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref47","first-page":"313","volume-title":"Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications","author":"Weber","year":"2012"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv2x8v8c7.24","volume-title":"Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent","author":"Priest","year":"1989"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1968621"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref14","volume-title":"The Language of Thought","author":"Fodor","year":"1975"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203252642"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110876802.3","volume-title":"Negation. A Notion in Focus","author":"Dunn","year":"1996"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00453019"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042469","volume-title":"Mathematical Logic","author":"Quine","year":"1951"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093635745"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv2x8v8c7.19","article-title":"The non-triviality of dialectical set theory","author":"Brady","year":"1989","journal-title":"Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-2557-7_9"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref31","volume-title":"Doubt Truth to Be a Liar","author":"Priest","year":"2006"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199230747.001.0001"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0460-1_4"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01048355"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0031819109990489"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref29","volume-title":"An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. From If to Is","author":"Priest","year":"2001"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195159035.001.0001","volume-title":"A Brief History of the Paradox. Philosophy and the Labyrinths of the Mind","author":"Sorensen","year":"2003"},{"key":"S175502031400001X_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0011"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S175502031400001X","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T15:18:03Z","timestamp":1716563883000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S175502031400001X\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,25]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S175502031400001X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s175502031400001x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,25]]}}}