{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T11:06:25Z","timestamp":1777892785538,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]],"date-time":"2015-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1423699200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Dialetheism is the metaphysical claim that there are true contradictions. And based on this view, Graham Priest and his collaborators have been suggesting solutions to a number of paradoxes. Those paradoxes include Russell\u2019s paradox in naive set theory. For the purpose of dealing with this paradox, Priest is known to have argued against the presence of classical negation in the underlying logic of naive set theory. The aim of the present paper is to challenge this view by showing that there is a way to handle classical negation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020314000525","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]],"date-time":"2015-02-12T14:26:41Z","timestamp":1423751201000},"page":"279-295","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["REMARKS ON NAIVE SET THEORY BASED ON<b>LP<\/b>"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"HITOSHI","family":"OMORI","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref6","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Handbook of Philosphical Logic","volume":"14","author":"Carnielli","year":"2007"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020312000019"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref21","unstructured":"Verd\u00e9e P . (2014). Degrees of inconsistency. Carefully combining classical and paraconsistent negation. In preparation."},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020309990281"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-010-9296-9"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref11","first-page":"320","volume-title":"Proceedings of Twenty-Second International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA2011)","author":"Omori","year":"2011"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258428"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370190"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref2","first-page":"227","article-title":"A rich paraconsistent extension of full positive logic","volume":"185","author":"Batens","year":"2004","journal-title":"Logique et Analyse"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref3","article-title":"Free of detachment: Logic, rationality, and gluts","author":"Beall","year":"2013","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-1731353"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref5","article-title":"Paraconsistent set theory by predicating on consistency","author":"Carnielli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/9780203910139"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12775\/LLP.2000.008"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10699-012-9296-5"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093891487"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-06080-4_11"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-9011-6_8","volume-title":"Logic, Reasoning and Rationality","author":"Omori","year":"2014"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0460-1_4"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref16","volume-title":"Doubt Truth to be a Liar","author":"Priest","year":"2006a"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199263301.001.0001"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093634406"},{"key":"S1755020314000525_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzs025"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1755020314000525","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,20]],"date-time":"2019-08-20T21:55:50Z","timestamp":1566338150000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1755020314000525\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1755020314000525"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020314000525","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]}}}