{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T15:22:27Z","timestamp":1753888947420},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,5]],"date-time":"2018-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1543968000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Recent discussions on Fregean and neo-Fregean foundations for arithmetic and real analysis pay much attention to what is called either \u2018Application Constraint\u2019 (<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline1\" \/><jats:tex-math>$AC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>) or \u2018Frege Constraint\u2019 (<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline2\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>), the requirement that a mathematical theory be so outlined that it immediately allows explaining for its applicability. We distinguish between two constraints, which we, respectively, denote by the latter of these two names, by showing how<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline3\" \/><jats:tex-math>$AC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>generalizes Frege\u2019s views while<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline4\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>comes closer to his original conceptions. Different authors diverge on the interpretation of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline5\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>and on whether it applies to definitions of both natural and real numbers. Our aim is to trace the origins of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline6\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>and to explore how different understandings of it can be faithful to Frege\u2019s views about such definitions and to his foundational program. After rehearsing the essential elements of the relevant debate (\u00a71), we appropriately distinguish<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline7\" \/><jats:tex-math>$AC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>from<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline8\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>(\u00a72). We discuss six rationales which may motivate the adoption of different instances of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline9\" \/><jats:tex-math>$AC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>and<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline10\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>(\u00a73). We turn to the possible interpretations of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline11\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>(\u00a74), and advance a Semantic<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline12\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>(\u00a74.1), arguing that while it suits Frege\u2019s definition of natural numbers (4.1.1), it cannot reasonably be imposed on definitions of real numbers (\u00a74.1.2), for reasons only partly similar to those offered by Crispin Wright (\u00a74.1.3). We then rehearse a recent exchange between Bob Hale and Vadim Batitzky to shed light on Frege\u2019s conception of real numbers and magnitudes (\u00a74.2). We argue that an Architectonic version of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline13\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>is indeed faithful to Frege\u2019s definition of real numbers, and compatible with his views on natural ones. Finally, we consider how attributing different instances of<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline14\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>to Frege and appreciating the role of the Architectonic<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" orientation=\"portrait\" mime-subtype=\"gif\" mimetype=\"image\" position=\"float\" xlink:type=\"simple\" xlink:href=\"S1755020318000278_inline15\" \/><jats:tex-math>$FC$<\/jats:tex-math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>can provide a more perspicuous understanding of his foundational program, by questioning common pictures of his logicism (\u00a75).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020318000278","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,5]],"date-time":"2018-12-05T08:37:04Z","timestamp":1543999024000},"page":"97-143","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["FREGE\u2019S CONSTRAINT AND THE NATURE OF FREGE\u2019S FOUNDATIONAL PROGRAM"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"MARCO","family":"PANZA","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"ANDREA","family":"SERENI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref43","unstructured":"Sereni A. (manuscript). On the Philosophical Significance of Frege\u2019s Constraint."},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref45","first-page":"317","article-title":"Frege meets dedekind: A Neologicist treatment of real analysis","volume":"4","author":"Shapiro","year":"2000","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199645268.003.0017"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-26042-6"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref10","volume-title":"Die Grundgesetze der Arithmetick","volume":"I\u2013II","author":"Frege","year":"1893"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110378795.357","volume-title":"Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium","author":"Peacocke","year":"2015"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref4","unstructured":"Boccuni F. & Panza M. (Manuscript). On the logicality of Frege\u2019s definition of real numbers."},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/110.440.937"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2184508"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref29","volume-title":"Foundations of Measurement","volume":"3","author":"Krantz","year":"1971"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref22","unstructured":"Hankel H. (1687). Theorie der Complexen Zahlensysteme [\u2026]. Theil I der Vorlesugen \u00fcber die Complexen Zahlen [\u2026] in Zwei Theilen. Leipzig: Leopold Voss."},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0195148770.003.0020"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.28937\/978-3-7873-2549-8","volume-title":"Nachgelassene Schriften und Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel","author":"Frege","year":"1976"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref44","volume-title":"Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology","volume":"2","author":"Shapiro","year":"1997"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/nous.12249"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S175502030909011X"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref35","volume-title":"System der Deductiven und Inductiven Logik [\u2026]. In\u2019s Deutsche \u00fcberetragen von J. Schiel. Vierte deutsche nach der Achten des Originals erweiterte Auflage","volume":"2","author":"Mill","year":"1877"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref8","volume-title":"Frege. Philosophy of Mathematics","author":"Dummett","year":"1991"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref11","first-page":"368","article-title":"\u00dcber die Grundlagen der Geometrie","volume":"12","author":"Frege","year":"1903","journal-title":"Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/10.3.286"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref9","volume-title":"Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine Logische Mathematische Untersuchung \u00fcber den Begriff der Zahl","author":"Frege","year":"1884"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/8.2.100"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref51","author":"Taisbak","year":"2003"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01973030"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simons P. (1987). Frege\u2019s theory of real numbers. History and Philosophy of Logic, 8, 25\u201344. Also in Demopoulos, W. (1995). Frege\u2019s Philosopjy of Mathematics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 358\u2013383.","DOI":"10.1080\/01445348708837106"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2218759"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2183530"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref5","first-page":"345","volume-title":"Frege Synthetisized. Esays on the Philosophical and Foundational Work of Gottlob Frege","author":"Currie","year":"1986"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24214-9_17","volume-title":"Early Analytic Philosophy. New Perspective on the Tradition","author":"Panza","year":"2016"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref6","unstructured":"Dedekind R. (1888). Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg und Sohn. Also in Dedekind, R. (1930\u20131932). Gesammelte Mathematische Werke (E. N. von Herausgegeben, R. Fricke, and \u00d6. Ore, editors), Vol. 3. Braunschweig: Vieweg, Chapter LI, 335\u2013391."},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-3681(96)00015-5"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref12","volume-title":"The Foundations of Arithmetic. A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number","author":"Frege","year":"1950"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref13","volume-title":"On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic","author":"Frege","year":"1971"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref15","volume-title":"Basic Laws of Arithmetic","author":"Frege","year":"2013"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1057\/9781137024657"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref17","unstructured":"Gauss C. F. (1831). Announcement of the Commentatio secunda to the Theoria residuorum biquadraticorum. Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 1, 625\u2013638. Also in Gauss, C. F. (1863\u20131917). Werke, Vol. 2. Herausgegeben von der K\u00f6niglichen Gesellchaft der Wissenschaften zu G\u00f6ttingen. G\u00f6ttingen: Dietrich, pp. 169\u2013178."},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/019513916X.003.0002"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/10.3.304"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref34","volume-title":"A System Of Logic, Ratiocinative And Inductive [\u2026], Eight Edition","volume":"2","author":"Mill","year":"1872"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref23","first-page":"193","article-title":"Ueber die Thatsachen, die der Geometrie zum Grunde liegen","author":"Helmholtz","year":"1868","journal-title":"Nachrichten von der K\u00f6niglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften [\u2026]"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref24","first-page":"17","volume-title":"Philosophische Aufs\u00e4tze, Eduard Zeller zu seinem f\u00fcnfzigj\u00e4hrigen Doctorjubil\u00e4um gewidmet","author":"Helmoltz","year":"1887"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511804649"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199645268.003.0015"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-95777-7_5"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-111-1-25"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref33","volume-title":"Euclidis Data","author":"Menge","year":"1846"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00426.x"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref39","first-page":"133","article-title":"Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen","volume":"13","author":"Riemann","year":"1866","journal-title":"Abhandlungen der K\u00f6niglichen Gesellshaft der Wissenshaften zu G\u00f6ttingen"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref41","volume-title":"The Principles of Mathematics","author":"Russell","year":"1903"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674043985","volume-title":"The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem","author":"Steiner","year":"1998"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref53","volume-title":"Frege in Perspective","author":"Weiner","year":"1990"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1038336879","article-title":"Neo-Fregean foundations for real analysis: Some reflections on Frege\u2019s constraint","volume":"41","author":"Wright","year":"2000","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Die axiome der quantit\u00e4t und die lehre vom mass","volume":"53","author":"H\u00f6lder","year":"1901","journal-title":"Berichte \u00fcber die Verhandlungen der K\u00f6niglich S\u00e4chsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, mathematisch-physischen Classe"},{"key":"S1755020318000278_ref42","volume-title":"Principia Mathematica","volume":"3","author":"Russell","year":"1910"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1755020318000278","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,7]],"date-time":"2022-09-07T16:42:10Z","timestamp":1662568930000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1755020318000278\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,5]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1755020318000278"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020318000278","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,5]]}}}