{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T03:23:58Z","timestamp":1774927438765,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]],"date-time":"2025-10-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760486400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    The paper proposes and studies new classical, type-free theories of truth and determinateness with unprecedented features. The theories are fully compositional, strongly classical (namely, their internal and external logics are both classical), and feature a\n                    <jats:italic>defined<\/jats:italic>\n                    determinateness predicate satisfying desirable and widely agreed principles. The theories capture a conception of truth and determinateness according to which the generalizing power associated with the classicality and full compositionality of truth is combined with the identification of a natural class of sentences\u2014the determinate ones\u2014for which clear-cut semantic rules are available. Our theories can also be seen as the\n                    <jats:italic>classical closures<\/jats:italic>\n                    of Kripke\u2013Feferman truth: their\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S1755020325100968_inline1.png\"\/>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$\\omega $<\/jats:tex-math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    -models, which we precisely pin down, result from including in the extension of the truth predicate the sentences that are satisfied by a Kripkean closed-off fixed-point model. The theories compare to recent theories proposed by Fujimoto and Halbach, featuring a primitive determinateness predicate. In the paper we show that our theories entail all principles of Fujimoto and Halbach\u2019s theories, and are proof-theoretically equivalent to Fujimoto and Halbach\u2019s\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S1755020325100968_inline2.png\"\/>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$\\mathsf {CD}^{+}$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    . We also show establish some negative results on Fujimoto and Halbach\u2019s theories: such results show that, unlike what happens in our theories, the primitive determinateness predicate prevents one from establishing clear and unrestricted semantic rules for the language with type-free truth.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020325100968","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]],"date-time":"2025-10-15T09:26:20Z","timestamp":1760520380000},"page":"1041-1067","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["ON CLASSICAL DETERMINATE TRUTH"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"LUCA","family":"CASTALDO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/05591te55","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"LMU MUNICH"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-1027-5294","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"CARLO","family":"NICOLAI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/04cw6st05","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"KING\u2019S COLLEGE"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1755020325100968_r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258428"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzaa083"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020320000167"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r22","volume-title":"Pursuit of Truth","author":"Quine","year":"1990"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r23","first-page":"227","article-title":"Remarks on significance and meaningful applicability","volume":"94","author":"Reinhardt","year":"1985","journal-title":"Mathematical Logic and Formal Systems"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-022-03816-6"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2274902"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2024634"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2178\/bsl\/1286284556"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139696586"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020321000137"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0458-8_5"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r14","volume-title":"Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic","author":"H\u00e1jek","year":"1998"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/9781439865873-16"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/malq.19890350202"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020314000379"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2895327"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00305492"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r4","volume-title":"Logical Frameworks for Truth and Abstraction: An Axiomatic Study","author":"Cantini","year":"1996"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-017-9424-3"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199230747.001.0001"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020308080209"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/jsl.2023.49"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r25","volume-title":"Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability","author":"Rogers","year":"1987"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r26","first-page":"1","volume-title":"International Symposium on Lambda-Calculus and Computer Science Theory","author":"Scott","year":"1975"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r18","volume-title":"Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox","author":"McGee","year":"1991"},{"key":"S1755020325100968_r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-46825-7"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1755020325100968","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T02:24:08Z","timestamp":1774923848000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1755020325100968\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1755020325100968"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020325100968","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"\u00a9 The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}},{"value":"This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.","name":"license","label":"License","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}},{"value":"This content has been made available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"}]}}