{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T18:37:27Z","timestamp":1792089447057,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,26]],"date-time":"2024-09-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727308800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":269,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ASHE"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n\t \n\t Objective:<\/jats:title>\n\t This manuscript calculates the estimated cost-savings associated with implementing criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO).<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>\n\t \n\t Design:<\/jats:title>\n\t The study evaluated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales<\/jats:italic> isolates utilizing the MDRO criteria established by Infection Prevention and Control. Isolates were categorized as either meeting or not meeting criteria. The number of inpatient days for patients with isolates not meeting criteria was calculated. The average daily cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) for patients in contact isolation was determined via literature review. Annual cost savings were determined by multiplying the total number of inpatient days by the average cost of PPE per day. Because our institution only isolates patients who meet the MDRO criteria, this approach was considered a cost-saving measure.<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>\n\t \n\t Setting:<\/jats:title>\n\t 560 licensed bed, tertiary care facility in the United States.<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>\n\t \n\t Patients:<\/jats:title>\n\t Adult inpatients between the years of 2019\u20132022 with an ESBL-producing Enterobacterales<\/jats:italic> isolated from any specimen source.<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>\n\t \n\t Results:<\/jats:title>\n\t 229 patients met inclusion criteria. 73% of isolates did not meet MDRO criteria. The patients with ESBL isolates not meeting criteria represented 2942 isolation days over four years. The average cost of PPE for contact isolation per day was $40.18. Cost-savings were estimated at $118,209 over four years.<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>\n\t \n\t Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n\t Our findings provide support for other healthcare systems to define organisms that warrant transmission-based contact precautions.<\/jats:p>\n\t <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/ash.2024.351","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,26]],"date-time":"2024-09-26T08:36:09Z","timestamp":1727339769000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Implementing standardized criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms: a retrospective cost-avoidance analysis for discontinuing contact precautions for ESBL"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-4006-7703","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brenna","family":"Crossley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9241-4291","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carmen T.","family":"Cortes-Ramos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-5864-4516","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dawn","family":"Nolt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2020.01.022"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref7","unstructured":"7. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Type and duration of precautions recommended for selected infections and conditions. 2019. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/infectioncontrol\/guidelines\/isolation\/appendix\/type-duration-precautions.html. Accessed on April 23, 2024."},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2007.10.007"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/NNA.0000000000001160"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(19)30626-7"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/IDR.S234610"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/675294"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciz186"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/ash.2021.189"},{"key":"S2732494X24003516_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/ash.2021.94"}],"container-title":["Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S2732494X24003516","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,26]],"date-time":"2024-09-26T08:36:11Z","timestamp":1727339771000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S2732494X24003516\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"alternative-id":["S2732494X24003516"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/ash.2024.351","relation":{},"ISSN":["2732-494X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2732-494X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"article-number":"e153"}}