{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T13:48:45Z","timestamp":1792072125213,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792022400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":287,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Law. Med. Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This commentary responds to Truby and Kantiana\u2019s exploration of an international human right to an AI-extended lifespan. It argues that framing longevity as an individual technological entitlement risks converting time itself into a luxury good. Instead, health law should embrace \u201ctime justice\u201d: the equitable distribution of socially produced chances to live a healthy life. Rather than debating a futuristic right to live to 120, legal frameworks must address the present-day theft of healthy years driven by profound socioeconomic disparities. Because AI longevity will emerge first as measurement rather than therapy, this commentary proposes concrete structural reforms to prevent algorithmic ageism and inequality. To prevent a temporal caste system, the commentary proposes four structural interventions: (1) establishing a biological age data firewall to prevent discrimination; (2) extending the equitable logic of the Nagoya Protocol to grant source communities input-stage sovereignty over human genomic training data; (3) exacting a \u201clongevity dividend\u201d to fund baseline public health; and (4) redesigning life course institutions. Ultimately, the central legal challenge is not securing a right to radical life extension, but preventing AI from deepening the unequal distribution of time.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2026.10276","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T13:10:37Z","timestamp":1792069837000},"page":"384-386","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["AI Longevity and the Law of Time Justice"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0155-8490","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Y. Tony","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/00y4zzh67","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"The George Washington University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1073110526102769_r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10730-022-09499-3"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.4226"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r4","first-page":"12955","article-title":"Longevity Biotechnology: Bridging AI, Biomarkers, Geroscience and Clinical Applications for Healthy Longevity","volume":"16","author":"Lyu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Aging"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r8","volume-title":"Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence","year":"2021"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s43587-024-00702-3"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r7","unstructured":"7. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-233, 122 Stat. 881."},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/gnab167"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2026.10262","article-title":"AI\u2019s Promise of Healthy Longevity: Exploring the Implications of Extended Lifespans Under International Law","author":"Truby","year":"2026","journal-title":"Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r10","unstructured":"10. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 25 on Science and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, U.N. Doc. E\/C.12\/GC\/25 (2020), https:\/\/docs.un.org\/en\/E\/C.12\/GC\/25."},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r11","volume-title":"Global Report on Ageism","year":"2021"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmet.2016.05.011"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r6","volume-title":"Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health","year":"2021"},{"key":"S1073110526102769_r9","unstructured":"9. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, October 29, 2010, 3008 U.N.T.S."}],"container-title":["Journal of Law, Medicine &amp; Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1073110526102769","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T13:12:51Z","timestamp":1792069971000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1073110526102769\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":["A Commentary on Truby and Kantiana, \u201cAI\u2019s Promise of Healthy Longevity: Exploring the Implications of Extended Lifespans Under International Law\u201d"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"alternative-id":["S1073110526102769"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jme.2026.10276","relation":{},"ISSN":["1073-1105","1748-720X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1073-1105","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-720X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}}}