{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,3]],"date-time":"2024-09-03T09:37:18Z","timestamp":1725356238169},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,7,31]],"date-time":"2008-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1217462400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":6513,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Biosoc. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:p>Users of the six major methods of contraception are compared across a broad range of variables using data from a community sample. Differences between the groups were apparent for a range of socioeconomic and reproductive variables, and current users of the various methods also differed in their past use of contraception. Users of barrier methods fared particularly well. Few differences were observed for current health status or for the sociocultural variables examined, although users of natural methods differed from all others in their religious affiliation and commitment.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Discriminant analysis showed that the most predictive variables distinguishing women who had opted for permanent methods of contraception (female sterilization and vasectomy) were the woman's stated reason for using her current method and her past contraceptive patterns; the inclusion of social, health and reproductive indicators did little to improve the prediction. It is argued that heightened expectations for contraceptive efficacy in the face of increasing concerns about long-term health consequences have contributed to the increased use of permanent methods.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0021932000018824","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,7,31]],"date-time":"2008-07-31T08:03:52Z","timestamp":1217491432000},"page":"405-421","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Predicting contraceptive method usage among women in West Scotland"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Kate","family":"Hunt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ellen","family":"Annandale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,7,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(86)90067-3"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref016","volume-title":"Classification of Occupations","year":"1980"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref023","first-page":"15","article-title":"Trends in contraceptive method usage since 1970","volume":"12","author":"Wellings","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br. J. Fam. Plann."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref021","volume-title":"Inequalities in Health. The Black Report and The Health Divide","author":"Townsend","year":"1988"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref020","volume-title":"The Sexual Politics of Reproduction","author":"Thomas","year":"1985"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref008","first-page":"1189","article-title":"Meeting the need for female sterilisation","volume":"ii","year":"1989","journal-title":"Lancet, ii"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348809004163"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref002","volume-title":"Family Planning in Scotland in 1982","author":"Bone","year":"1985"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0021932000017727"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref018","first-page":"809","article-title":"Contraceptive practice in New Zealand","volume":"101","author":"Paul","year":"1988","journal-title":"NZ med. J."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref014","volume-title":"Readings for a New Public Health","author":"Macintyre","year":"1989"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(86)90079-X"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref005","volume-title":"Family Formation 1976","author":"Dunnell","year":"1979"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref022","first-page":"973","article-title":"Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk in young women","volume":"i","year":"1989","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref001","first-page":"595","article-title":"Contraceptive attitudes and practice in women choosing sterilisation","volume":"34","author":"Bledin","year":"1984","journal-title":"J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.292.6527.1029"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref006","volume-title":"West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: The Sampling Scheme, Frame and Procedures for the Cohort Studies","author":"Ecob","year":"1987"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref007","first-page":"985","article-title":"Another look at the pill and breast cancer","volume":"ii","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref003","first-page":"98","article-title":"Decision-making and the pill: the consumer's view","volume":"11","author":"Coulter","year":"1985","journal-title":"Br. J. Fam. Plann."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref009","first-page":"3","article-title":"The first pill-taking generation: past and present use of contraception amongst a cohort of women born in the early 1950s","volume":"16","author":"Hunt","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br. J. Fam. Plann."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0021932000017703"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref015","first-page":"116","article-title":"The characteristics of women using depot medroxy-progesterone acetate: a cancer risk profile","volume":"15","author":"Mant","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br. J. Fam. Plann."},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref017","volume-title":"General Household Survey, 1983","year":"1985"},{"key":"S0021932000018824_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0277-9536(86)90082-1"}],"container-title":["Journal of Biosocial Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0021932000018824","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,18]],"date-time":"2019-05-18T16:01:51Z","timestamp":1558195311000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0021932000018824\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1990,10]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0021932000018824"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0021932000018824","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9320","1469-7599"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9320","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-7599","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1990,10]]}}}