{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,13]],"date-time":"2023-09-13T21:11:55Z","timestamp":1694639515804},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,25]],"date-time":"2010-03-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1269475200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":10402,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J. Hyg."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1981,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:p>Radioimmunoassay (RIA) for rubella-specific IgM antibodies was compared with haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) in conjunction with gel filtration for the diagnosis of rubella infection in pregnant women during a 1-year period. In total 476 women were investigated of whom 221 were tested for rubella IgM. Both techniques gave positive results with 64 sera, and RIA alone with one additional serum.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Difficulties associated with the removal of non-specific HI activity were encountered with four sera all of which were negative by RIA.<\/jats:p><jats:p>RIA was found to have practical advantages over the gel filtration method but is at present technically more difficult to perform.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022172400069461","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,25]],"date-time":"2010-03-25T13:15:54Z","timestamp":1269522954000},"page":"249-255","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of radioimmunoassay and the gel filtration technique for routine diagnosis of rubella during pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"87","author":[{"given":"H. O.","family":"Kangro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Jackson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R. B.","family":"Heath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022172400026243"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022172400047100"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1099\/00222615-11-4-411"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022172400042674"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref006","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Progress in Clinical Rheumatology","author":"Lawrence","year":"1965"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.28.5.377"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref005","first-page":"577","article-title":"The detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies by radioimmunoassay","volume":"59","author":"Kangro","year":"1978","journal-title":"British Journal of Experimental Pathology"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02121750"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(69)92386-1"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1128\/jcm.5.3.257-262.1977","article-title":"Solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies. Comparison with sucrose density gradient centrifugation test","volume":"5","author":"Meurman","year":"1977","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.26.2.161"},{"key":"S0022172400069461_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1099\/00222615-9-3-355"}],"container-title":["Journal of Hygiene"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022172400069461","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,25]],"date-time":"2021-10-25T05:45:04Z","timestamp":1635140704000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022172400069461\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1981,10]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1981,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022172400069461"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022172400069461","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-1724"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-1724","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1981,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Cambridge University Press 1981","name":"license","label":"License","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}