{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T20:29:19Z","timestamp":1790627359598,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]],"date-time":"2013-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1367366400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215113000856_sec1\"><jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the general surgical and anaesthetic literature, there has been a decline in research output originating from the UK. This study analysed the 10 globally leading and 2 UK leading otorhinolaryngology journals to determine whether this trend was also reflected within otorhinolaryngology.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215113000856_sec2\"><jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Citable research output was analysed from 4 individual years, over a 10-year period (2000\u20132010), to determine absolute output, geographical mix and article type.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215113000856_sec3\"><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The proportion of research output from the UK and Ireland grew 22.8 per cent among the leading global otorhinolaryngology journals, but fell 28.6 per cent among the leading two UK otorhinolaryngology journals. The converse trend was true for the USA and Canada. Output from European and the rest of the world grew among both sets of journals, while Japanese output fell. \u2018Research\u2019 articles remained the most prevalent type.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215113000856_sec4\"><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p>These results are encouraging as they refute the fall in UK research output observed by other authors. In the face of growing challenges, it is important to maintain published output so that the fate that has befallen other specialties is not mirrored within UK otorhinolaryngology.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215113000856","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,2]],"date-time":"2013-05-02T00:47:11Z","timestamp":1367455631000},"page":"556-561","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Are UK otorhinolaryngologists maintaining their research output?"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"127","author":[{"given":"K","family":"Kulkarni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Kulkarni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J","family":"Ramsden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.314.7079.497"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d4121"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref4","volume-title":"Shape of the Medical Workforce: Informing Medical Specialty Training Numbers. Recommendations for Medical Specialty Training Numbers","year":"2011"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surge.2010.10.002"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5014\/ajot.2011.001396"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref5","unstructured":"Thompson Reuters Web of Knowledge 2010 Journal Citation Reports. In: http:\/\/wokinfo.com\/products_tools\/analytical\/jcr\/ [13 February 2012]"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7422.1041"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7861\/clinmedicine.9-1-22"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref7","volume-title":"International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base \u2013 2011","year":"2011"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref11","volume-title":"Medically- and dentally-Qualified Academic Staff: Recommendations for Training the Researchers and Educators of the Future. Report of the Academic Careers Sub-Committee of Modernising Medical Careers and the UK Clinical Research Collaboration","year":"2005"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2008.05475.x"},{"key":"S0022215113000856_ref12","volume-title":"From Theory to Theatre: Overcoming Barriers to Innovation in Surgery","year":"2011"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215113000856","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,23]],"date-time":"2019-04-23T17:39:14Z","timestamp":1556041154000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215113000856\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215113000856"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215113000856","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]]}}}