{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,18]],"date-time":"2023-09-18T11:53:05Z","timestamp":1695037985372},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,14]],"date-time":"2014-02-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1392336000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":13,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114000140_sec1\"><jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study compared the performance of two new bone-anchored hearing aids with older bone-anchored hearing aids that were not fully digital.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114000140_sec2\"><jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Fourteen experienced bone-anchored hearing aid users participated in this cross-over study. Performance of their existing bone-anchored hearing aid was assessed using speech-in-noise testing and questionnaires. Participants were then fitted with either a Ponto Pro or a BP100 device. After four weeks of use with each new device, the same assessments were repeated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114000140_sec3\"><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Speech-in-noise testing for the 50 per cent signal-to-noise ratio (the ratio at which 50 per cent of responses were correct) showed no significant differences between the Ponto Pro and the BP100 devices (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0= 0.1) However, both devices showed significant improvement compared with the participants' previous bone-anchored hearing aid devices (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001). There were no significant differences between the two new devices in the questionnaire data.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114000140_sec4\"><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Both fully digital bone-anchored hearing aids demonstrated superior speech processing compared with the previous generation of devices. There were no substantial differences between the two digital devices in either objective or subjective tests.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215114000140","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,14]],"date-time":"2014-02-14T06:46:22Z","timestamp":1392360382000},"page":"119-127","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"128","author":[{"given":"P","family":"Hill-Feltham","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S A","family":"Roberts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Gladdis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-200104000-00007"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200207000-00011"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/0022215021911310"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref12","unstructured":"MHAS Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles: Modernising Hearing Aid Services (MHAS). In: http:\/\/mhas.ihr.mrc.ac.uk\/download.htm [25 April 2013]"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31821a02dd"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref10","first-page":"108","volume-title":"Br J Audiol","volume":"13","author":"Bench","year":"1979"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14992027.2011.605806"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/108471380100500401"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-6665(05)70335-2"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215100136229","article-title":"The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results","volume":"21","author":"Cooper","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol Suppl"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref2","first-page":"159","article-title":"Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?","volume":"10","author":"Hol","year":"2005","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1084713811434617"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref8","volume-title":"An International Study Reveals the Benefits of Oticon Medical's Bone Anchored Sound Processor Ponto\u2122","author":"Rosenbom","year":"2010"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref19","first-page":"1","article-title":"Is digital enough for improved hearing in noise? Studies comparing digital and multi-microphone instruments","volume":"24","author":"May","year":"1998","journal-title":"Phonak Focus"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref17","first-page":"18","article-title":"MarkeTrak VI: consumers rate improvements sought in hearing instruments","volume":"9","author":"Kochkin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hear Rev"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref11","first-page":"80","volume-title":"Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide","author":"Fielden","year":"2006"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/010503999424851"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1179\/146701011X13001036693494"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.HJ.0000286545.33961.e7"},{"key":"S0022215114000140_ref6","first-page":"32","article-title":"The Ponto bone-anchored hearing system","volume":"71","author":"Westerkull","year":"2011","journal-title":"Adv Otorhinolaryngol"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215114000140","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,7]],"date-time":"2019-08-07T12:45:39Z","timestamp":1565181939000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215114000140\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215114000140"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215114000140","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}}}