{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T18:32:44Z","timestamp":1760985164848},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]],"date-time":"2014-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409097600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114001625_sec1\"><jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Isolated olfactory dysfunction is a common complaint; the vast majority of cases are benign and untreatable. A common dilemma is whether to image the olfactory tract of affected patients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114001625_sec2\"><jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title><jats:p>A case review of 100 consecutive patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the primary complaint of olfactory dysfunction was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis, with or without nasal polyps, were excluded.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114001625_sec3\"><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities that were considered clinically relevant to the presentation of olfactory dysfunction were found in only seven patients (7 per cent). Of these, only one patient (1 per cent) had an abnormality found that altered their clinical management. A comparison of the findings for children (less than 16 years old,<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a05) with those for adults (equal to or more than 16 years old,<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a095) revealed that 4 per cent of adults scanned had olfactory-related pathology diagnosed, as opposed to 60 per cent of children.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215114001625_sec4\"><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cross-sectional imaging may not be necessary in most patients with olfactory dysfunction. Imaging adds little to the patient history and clinical examination findings.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215114001625","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]],"date-time":"2014-08-27T04:09:39Z","timestamp":1409112579000},"page":"810-813","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Does imaging of the olfactory tract change the clinical management of patients with olfactory disturbance? A case series of 100 consecutive patients"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"128","author":[{"given":"J","family":"Powell","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M Reda","family":"Elbadawey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"Zammit-Maempel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.18.2307"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00415-008-0807-9"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1177\/014556130108001216","article-title":"Is imaging necessary in the evaluation of the patient with an isolated complaint of anosmia?","volume":"80","author":"Busaba","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ear Nose Throat J"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4193\/Rhino50E2","article-title":"EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists","volume":"50","author":"Fokkens","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rhinology"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1749-4486.2008.01819.x"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.6505700"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/chemse\/bjr102"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200404000-00026"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.127.5.497"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fsc.2011.10.011"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2012.659759"},{"key":"S0022215114001625_ref9","first-page":"2683","article-title":"Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924","volume":"17","author":"Broich","year":"1997","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215114001625","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,14]],"date-time":"2019-08-14T06:15:05Z","timestamp":1565763305000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215114001625\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215114001625"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215114001625","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]}}}