{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,14]],"date-time":"2026-11-14T23:46:17Z","timestamp":1794699977889,"version":"4.9.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,18]],"date-time":"2020-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1608249600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":17,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>This study aimed to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes, in a tertiary referral centre, of two different types of semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction devices.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Method<\/jats:title>This study involved prospective data collection and review of patients implanted between November 2014 and December 2016. Glasgow Hearing Aid Inventory (Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile or Glasgow Hearing Aid Difference Profile) and Client Oriented Scale of Improvement were completed where appropriate. Surgical and audiological outcomes were recorded in the surgical notes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>Glasgow Hearing Aid Difference Profile and Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile showed similar mean score in the active and the passive transcutaneous bone conduction devices. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement showed improvements in listening situations. Post-operative speech reception threshold showed better mean threshold in the active transcutaneous bone conduction devices group when compared with the passive transcutaneous bone conduction devices group. No device failures or surgical complications existed in either group, with the surgical time being less in the passive transcutaneous bone conduction devices group.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusion<\/jats:title>Both devices are reliable semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction devices with excellent surgical and functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Overall surgical time was much less in the passive transcutaneous bone conduction devices group with no necessity for pre-planning. This is much easier to remove with the possibility of conversion to other devices in the manufacturer\u2019s portfolio and wide-ranging wireless accessories. Further studies are needed to assess the longer-term results in a bigger population.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215120002339","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,18]],"date-time":"2020-12-18T10:17:05Z","timestamp":1608286625000},"page":"1065-1068","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Surgical and functional outcomes of two types of transcutaneous bone conduction implants"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"134","author":[{"given":"G","family":"Scotta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Allam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P A","family":"Dimitriadis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Yardley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J","family":"Ray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318185fabc","article-title":"Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome","volume":"29","author":"Stalfors","year":"2008","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1177\/0003489405114S1201","article-title":"Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present","volume":"195","author":"Snik","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31818599b8","article-title":"Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation","volume":"29","author":"de Wolf","year":"2008","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref15","unstructured":"15 NHS England (2016) clinical commissioning policy: bone conducting hearing implants (BCHIs) for hearing loss (all ages). In: https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/commissioning\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2013\/05\/16041_FINAL.pdf [2 April 2019]"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids","volume":"71","author":"Mudry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Adv Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000405","article-title":"Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing device","volume":"35","author":"Plontke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-6665(20)30393-5","article-title":"Titanium-anchored prostheses in otology","volume":"29","author":"Burton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Clin North Am"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31802c74c4","article-title":"Bone-anchored hearing aids incidence and management of postoperative complications","volume":"28","author":"House","year":"2007","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318263d780","article-title":"Minimal access surgery for implantable bone conduction systems: early experience with the \u201cSheffield\u201d incision","volume":"33","author":"Ray","year":"2012","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref23","first-page":"555892","article-title":"Conversion of the percutaneous bone anchored hearing aid system to a transcutaneous one - a straight forward surgical solution","volume":"14","author":"Bere","year":"2018","journal-title":"Glob J Oto"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1258\/0022215021911284","article-title":"The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues","volume":"28","author":"Dutt","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol Suppl"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.13072","article-title":"Superiorly curved scalp incision for implantation of magnetic transcutaneous bone conduction devices: multicentre experience of 60 patients","volume":"43","author":"Orhan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1159\/000078388","article-title":"Candidacy for the bone-anchored hearing aid","volume":"9","author":"Snik","year":"2004","journal-title":"Audiol Neurootol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref25","first-page":"769","volume-title":"Cochlear Implants: Audiologic Management and Considerations for Implantable Hearing Devices","author":"Wolfe","year":"2018"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref19","first-page":"27","article-title":"Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids","volume":"8","author":"Dillon","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Am Acad Audiol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref11","first-page":"79","article-title":"New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review","volume":"8","author":"Reinfeldt","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Devices (Auckl)"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416205","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/416205","article-title":"Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system","volume":"2014","author":"Kurz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12989","article-title":"On the evaluation of a superpower sound processor for bone-anchored hearing","volume":"43","author":"Bosman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1260","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200107000-00022","article-title":"Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory","volume":"111","author":"Arunachalam","year":"2001","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12484","article-title":"The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature","volume":"41","author":"Sprinzl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"834","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000712","article-title":"Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation","volume":"36","author":"Briggs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2016.1143119","article-title":"Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction","volume":"136","author":"Zernotti","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12828","article-title":"Outcomes following conversion of a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone conduction device in eight children","volume":"4","author":"Carr","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref5","first-page":"304","article-title":"Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone\u2013anchored hearing aids","volume":"2","author":"Tjellstr\u00f6m","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"key":"S0022215120002339_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2016.11.057","article-title":"Image-guided implantation of the Bonebridge\u2122 with a surgical navigation: A feasibility study","volume":"30","author":"Kong","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Surg Case Rep"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology & Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215120002339","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,26]],"date-time":"2022-05-26T10:42:42Z","timestamp":1653561762000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215120002339\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215120002339"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215120002339","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}}}