{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,26]],"date-time":"2023-05-26T11:28:41Z","timestamp":1685100521268},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]],"date-time":"2021-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626393600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121001821_sec_a1\"><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To statistically analyse the hearing thresholds of two cohorts undergoing stapedotomy for otosclerosis with two different prostheses.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121001821_sec_a2\" sec-type=\"methods\"><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective study was conducted comparing NiTiBOND (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 53) and Nitinol (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 38) prostheses.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121001821_sec_a3\" sec-type=\"results\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Average follow-up duration was 4.1 years for NiTiBOND and 4.4 years for Nitinol prostheses. The post-operative air\u2013bone gap was 10 dB or less, indicating clinical success. The <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-values for differences between (1) pre- and post-operative values in the NiTiBOND group, (2) pre- and post-operative values in the Nitinol group, (3) pre-operative values and (4) post-operative values in the two groups were: air\u2013bone gap \u2013 <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.631 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.647; four-frequency bone conduction threshold \u2013 <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.076, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.129, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.005; four-frequency air conduction threshold \u2013 <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.043 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.041; three-frequency (1, 2 and 4 kHz) bone conduction threshold pre-operatively \u2013 <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.639, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.495, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.001 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.01; and air conduction threshold at 4 kHz: \u2013 <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.03 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.058.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121001821_sec_a4\" sec-type=\"conclusions\"><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Post-operative audiological outcomes for NiTiBOND and Nitinol were comparable.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215121001821","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]],"date-time":"2021-07-16T04:19:44Z","timestamp":1626409184000},"page":"795-798","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparing intermediate-term hearing results of NiTiBOND and Nitinol prostheses in stapes surgery"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"135","author":[{"given":"A","family":"Koukkoullis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"Gerlinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Kov\u00e1cs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Z","family":"Szak\u00e1cs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Z","family":"Piski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"Szanyi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"T\u00f3th","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P","family":"R\u00e9v\u00e9sz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31823e28cb"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref6","unstructured":"6 STROBE statement. In: https:\/\/strobe-statement.org\/index.php?id=strobe-aims [1 September 2014]"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00216-004-2888-3"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlg.0000172274.73365.11"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.25586"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-013-2809-1"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref4","unstructured":"4 Kurz. NiTiBOND Stapes Prosthesis. In: https:\/\/www.kurzmed.com\/en\/products\/otologie\/stapedioplasty\/nitibond-stapes-prosthesis [5 February 2020]"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-015-3662-1"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318299a973"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.24652"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002069"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.14639\/0392-100X-1950","article-title":"Nitinol versus non-Nitinol prostheses in otosclerosis surgery: a meta-analysis","volume":"38","author":"Rogue","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0194-5998(95)70103-6"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.133.8.758"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref17","first-page":"69","article-title":"Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of Nitinol as an implant material","volume":"12","author":"Shabalovskaya","year":"2002","journal-title":"Biomed Mater Eng"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MLG.0b013e31805c9a5c"},{"key":"S0022215121001821_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.26114"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215121001821","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,12]],"date-time":"2022-05-12T08:50:27Z","timestamp":1652345427000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215121001821\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215121001821"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215121001821","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]]}}}