{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T11:41:17Z","timestamp":1772797277537,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,13]],"date-time":"2021-12-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1639353600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121004059_sec_a1\"><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aimed to compare two endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy techniques: lacrimal and double nasal mucosal flaps, and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without flap preservation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121004059_sec_a2\" sec-type=\"methods\"><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study was designed as a prospective randomised, controlled trial. Mucosal healing, granulation tissue formation and mucosal scar contracture were investigated after the surgery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121004059_sec_a3\" sec-type=\"results\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Ninety patients were included in the study (lacrimal and double nasal mucosal flaps, 46; endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without flap preservation, 44). Nine (18.8 per cent) patients in the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without flap preservation group and two patients (4.2 per cent) in the lacrimal and double nasal mucosal flaps group had inadequate wound healing (<jats:italic>p =<\/jats:italic> 0.025). Granulation tissue formation was detected in nine patients (18.8 per cent) in the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without flap preservation group and in 1 patient (2.1 per cent) in the lacrimal and double nasal mucosal flaps group (<jats:italic>p =<\/jats:italic> 0.008). Functional success rates in the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without flap preservation and lacrimal and double nasal mucosal flaps groups were 89.6 per cent and 97.9 per cent, respectively (<jats:italic>p =<\/jats:italic> 0.092). The operation time was similar in both groups (<jats:italic>p =<\/jats:italic> 0.122).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215121004059_sec_a4\" sec-type=\"conclusions\"><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The double mucosal flaps technique is a surgical procedure with satisfactory outcomes for the repair of mucosal defects and related issues.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215121004059","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,13]],"date-time":"2021-12-13T09:27:05Z","timestamp":1639387625000},"page":"1189-1195","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Mucosal healing with lacrimal and double mucosal flaps endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy \u2013 comparison with flap sacrificed technique: randomised, controlled study"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"136","author":[{"given":"E","family":"Ci\u011fer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7058-3457","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A","family":"\u0130\u015flek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.27989"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref29","first-page":"704","article-title":"New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians","volume":"5","author":"Ji","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.26730"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215115003278"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12754"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12070-017-1227-x"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21053\/ceo.2018.00031"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215100109405"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-012-2285-z"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01676830.2018.1444062"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1080\/000164800750001170","article-title":"Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy","volume":"120","author":"\u00d6nerci","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref5","first-page":"CD007097","article-title":"Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction","author":"Jawaheer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1945892418773638"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01676830.2015.1014510"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599818813123"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-019-0612-y"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-019-0716-4"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0000000000000261"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599812447759"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref4","first-page":"49","article-title":"Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions","volume":"200","author":"Onerci","journal-title":"Rhinology"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01676830.2019.1677726"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S113733","article-title":"Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies","volume":"10","author":"Dave","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.08.011"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12070-012-0541-6"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0145561319900025"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref9","first-page":"32","article-title":"Consort Group. Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"24","author":"Schulz","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anl.2009.01.005"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref26","first-page":"394","article-title":"Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal sac flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction","volume":"10","author":"Yuen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-015-3876-2"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21053\/ceo.2017.01781"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2014-305510"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2500\/ajra.2010.24.3393"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.24111"},{"key":"S0022215121004059_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/194589240201600202"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215121004059","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,24]],"date-time":"2022-11-24T08:32:21Z","timestamp":1669278741000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215121004059\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,13]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215121004059"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215121004059","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,13]]}}}