{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T04:45:47Z","timestamp":1780116347045,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,11]],"date-time":"2022-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1644537600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Laryngol. Otol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S0022215122000494_sec_a1\"><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aimed to evaluate the possibilities of artefact reduction using different anatomical implant positions with the Bonebridge bone-conduction hearing implant 602 for a patient with an acoustic neuroma requiring regular diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the tumour position.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215122000494_sec_a2\" sec-type=\"methods\"><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>Three implant positions and magnetic resonance imaging examinations with and without customised sequences for metal artefact suppression were investigated. The diagnostic usefulness was rated by a radiologist (qualitative evaluation), and the relation between the area of artefact and the total head area was calculated (quantitative evaluation).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215122000494_sec_a3\" sec-type=\"results\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Following the qualitative analysis, the radiologist rated the superior to middle fossa implant placement significantly better for diagnostic purposes, which is in agreement with the calculated artefact ratio (<jats:italic>p &lt;<\/jats:italic> 0.0001). The customised slice-encoding metal artifact correction view-angle tilting metal artifact reduction technique sequences significantly decreased the relative artefact area between 5.13 per cent and 25.02 per cent. The smallest mean artefact diameter was found for the superior to middle fossa position with 6.80 \u00b1 1.30 cm (range: 5.42\u20139.74 cm; reduction of 18.65 per cent).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S0022215122000494_sec_a4\" sec-type=\"conclusions\"><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The application of artefact reduction sequencing and special anatomical implant positioning allows regular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with the bone-conduction hearing implant 602 without sacrificing diagnostic imaging quality for tumour diagnosis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022215122000494","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,11]],"date-time":"2022-02-11T07:32:10Z","timestamp":1644564730000},"page":"263-269","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge)"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"137","author":[{"given":"S","family":"Edlinger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E","family":"Tenner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J","family":"Fr\u00fchwald","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4936-1424","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"G","family":"Sprinzl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001879"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2013.06.010"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoto.2014.2926"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215119000501"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0221484","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0221484","article-title":"Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Magele","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref24","unstructured":"24 Med-El Medical Electronics. Our history: Med-El Medical Electronics, 2018 In: http:\/\/www.medel.com\/history\/ [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref21","unstructured":"21 Hochmair, I . Cochlear implants: facts: Med-El, 2013. In: http:\/\/www.medel.com\/cochlear-implants-facts\/ [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001661"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.131.3.241"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref7","unstructured":"7 Cochlear. Cochlear\u2122 Baha\u00ae Attract System\u00ae RsifMCAfhwcu,ch\/non_cms\/orl\/ci-zentrum\/tipps\/MRI_Radiographers_Instructions_,Baha_4_Attract_Sys [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2007.11.016","article-title":"Indications for body MRI Part II: retroperitoneum, intestines and pelvis","volume":"65","author":"Vandenbroucke","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s00106-016-0129-7","article-title":"Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: English version","volume":"65","author":"Grupe","year":"2017","journal-title":"HNO"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref17","unstructured":"17 Cochlear Limited. 2017 Cochlear Limited annual report: Cochlear Limited, 2017 In: https:\/\/www.cochlear.com\/b0dffcb0-9826-4c99-9d58-ad7a760bddac\/en_corporate_cochlear_annualreport2017_1.78mb.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&amp;CONVERT_TO=url&amp;CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-b0dffcb0-9826-4c99-9d58-ad7a760bddac-lTJByF [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref5","first-page":"79","article-title":"New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review","volume":"8","author":"Reinfeldt","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Devices (Auckl)"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215118000518"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref23","unstructured":"23 Med-El Medical Electronics. Bonebridge | the first active bone conduction implant: Med-El Medical Electronics, 2018. In: http:\/\/www.medel.com\/int\/bonebridge\/ [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2007.11.015","article-title":"Indications for body MRI Part I. Upper abdomen and renal imaging","volume":"65","author":"Dujardin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2015.1115552","article-title":"MRI scanning in patients implanted with a round window or stapes coupled floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge","volume":"136","author":"Renninger","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngologica"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref18","unstructured":"18 Cochlear Limited. Cochlear nucleus implants magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidelines, United States of America: Cochlear Limited, 2017 In: https:\/\/www.cochlear.com\/9e2dc693-b2ff-490b-8861-b1b08e071539\/D774756-3_EN_MRI-Guidelines_CAM.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&amp;CONVERT_TO=url&amp;CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-9e2dc693-b2ff-490b-8861-b1b08e071539-lU7KDXI [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref10","unstructured":"10 Advanced Bionics AG. MRI safety information: advanced bionics AG, 2018. In: https:\/\/advancedbionics.com\/de\/de\/home\/professionals\/mri-safety.html [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3203","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-020-06380-2","article-title":"MRI after Bonebridge implantation: a comparison of two implant generations","volume":"278","author":"Utrilla","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200411000-00017"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref11","unstructured":"11 Cochlear Limited. MRI for nucleus cochlear implant systems: cochlear limited, 2018. In: https:\/\/www.cochlear.com\/intl\/home\/support\/cochlear-implant-systems\/global-warnings\/mri [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref8","unstructured":"8 MED-EL. The Bonebridge\u2122 bone conduction implant system. In: http:\/\/www.medel.FPM-EAf,com\/data\/downloadmanager\/downloads\/BONEBRIDGE_pro\/en-GB\/,BB_Brochure_EN_screen.pdf ["},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref9","unstructured":"9 Med-El Medical Electronics. MRI safety status overview: Med-El Medical Electronics, 2018 In: http:\/\/s3.medel.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/images\/MRI\/AW36743_20_MRI_Safety_Status_Overview_EU-EN_English.pdf [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2017.10.004"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref6","unstructured":"6 Sophono. Sophono\u00ae Bone Implant Precautions MTs. In: http:\/\/sophono.com\/wp-content\/GSAf,uploads\/S0595-rA-MRI-specification-sheet.pdf [3 April 2021]"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2079","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-014-3001-y","article-title":"MRI artefacts after Bonebridge implantation","volume":"271","author":"Steinmetz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016480701200210"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otc.2011.12.014","article-title":"Habilitation of auditory and vestibular dysfunction","volume":"45","author":"Snapp","year":"2012","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Clin North Am"},{"key":"S0022215122000494_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anl.2013.04.004"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0022215122000494","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,28]],"date-time":"2023-02-28T12:47:51Z","timestamp":1677588471000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0022215122000494\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,11]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022215122000494"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022215122000494","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2151","1748-5460"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2151","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-5460","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,11]]}}}