{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T09:23:16Z","timestamp":1788254596145,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1998,7,1]],"date-time":"1998-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":899251200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychol. Med."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background.<\/jats:bold> The equivalency of the Composite International\n \nDiagnostic Interview delivered by \nhuman interviewers (CIDI) and its computerized version (CIDI-Auto) was\n examined for anxiety \nand depressive disorders.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods.<\/jats:bold> Subjects were 40 patients at an Anxiety Disorders\n Clinic \nand 40 general medical practice \nattenders. The CIDI-Auto and CIDI were administered in counterbalanced\n order on the same day \nand measures of computer attitudes and the acceptability of the two interview\n formats were also \ntaken.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results.<\/jats:bold> The CIDI-Auto and the CIDI were found to be \nequally acceptable to subjects on the \ndimensions of comfort and preference, while the CIDI-Auto was \nrated as less embarrassing but too \nlong in comparison with the CIDI. The agreement between the two formats\n was acceptable with \nkappa values for ICD-10 diagnoses being above 0\u00b765 and for \nDSM-III-R diagnoses above 0\u00b75 except \nfor two diagnoses (generalized anxiety disorder and dysthymia). Discrepancies\n between the two \nformats were predicted by computer attitudes and not by computer experiences\n or the tendency to \nrespond in a socially desirable fashion.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions.<\/jats:bold> It is concluded that the CIDI-Auto in its \nself-administered form is an acceptable \nsubstitute for the CIDI for suitable subjects.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0033291798006655","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,27]],"date-time":"2002-07-27T09:33:33Z","timestamp":1027762413000},"page":"893-901","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":72,"title":["Are computerized interviews equivalent to human \ninterviewers? CIDI-Auto <i>versus<\/i> CIDI in anxiety and \ndepressive disorders"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"L.","family":"PETERS","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"CLARK","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"CARROLL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1998,7,1]]},"container-title":["Psychological Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0033291798006655","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]],"date-time":"2019-04-03T15:40:22Z","timestamp":1554306022000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0033291798006655\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1998,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0033291798006655"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0033291798006655","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-2917","1469-8978"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0033-2917","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-8978","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1998,7]]}}}