{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T18:01:42Z","timestamp":1781028102783,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,20]],"date-time":"2012-11-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1353369600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Behav Brain Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This response clarifies, qualifies, and develops our critique of the limits of intergroup liking as a means of challenging intergroup inequality. It does not dispute that dominant groups may espouse negative attitudes towards subordinate groups. Nor does it dispute that prejudice reduction can be an effective way of tackling resulting forms of intergroup hostility. What it does dispute is the assumption that getting dominant group members and subordinate group members to like each other more is the best way of improving intergroup relations that are characterized by relatively stable, institutionally embedded, relations of inequality. In other words, the main target of our critique is the<jats:italic>model of change<\/jats:italic>that underlies prejudice reduction interventions and the mainstream concept of \u201cprejudice\u201d on which they are based.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0140525x12001550","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,20]],"date-time":"2012-11-20T13:41:46Z","timestamp":1353418906000},"page":"451-466","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"John","family":"Dixon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Levine","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steve","family":"Reicher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Durrheim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0022615"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref17","first-page":"33","volume-title":"The social psychology of intergroup relations","author":"Tajfel","year":"1979"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijintrel.2011.12.011"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721411409025"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2012.01.003"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0022343310389506"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520337794","volume-title":"The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations","author":"Jackman","year":"1994"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref14","first-page":"257","volume-title":"The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2001"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref1","volume-title":"The nature of prejudice","author":"Allport","year":"1954"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0047404500015724"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref7","volume-title":"The holocaust of Indian partition: An inquest","author":"Godbole","year":"2006"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/casp.841"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.56.2.109"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref19","volume-title":"Social identities beyond comparisons: A relational models approach to intergroup relations","author":"Waldzus"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref8","volume-title":"On history","author":"Hobsbawm","year":"1998"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2011.29.3.255"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref20","first-page":"291","volume-title":"Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities","author":"Wright","year":"2009"},{"key":"S0140525X12001550_ref3","unstructured":"Becker J. C. , Wright S. C. , Lubensky M. E. & Zhou S. (under review) Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends what advantaged group members say (or don't say)."}],"container-title":["Behavioral and Brain Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0140525X12001550","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,31]],"date-time":"2022-01-31T18:21:42Z","timestamp":1643653302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0140525X12001550\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,20]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0140525X12001550"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0140525x12001550","relation":{},"ISSN":["0140-525X","1469-1825"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0140-525X","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1825","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,20]]}}}